Thread: Three Men planned "terrorist" attack on EDL

Results 21 to 40 of 45

  1. #21
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Netherlands
    Posts 4,478
    Rep Power 106

    Default

    Yeah, that's like the official definition of a stereotype.
    How so? That Islamists generally have beards? No, because that's correct.

    Soldiers also use explosives. Why aren't you calling them soldiers?
    Because they are not an army, obviously. That's like asking me why I'm not calling them doctors since they had knives.

    Terrorism is the employment of violence against a civilian population. They were allegedly going to use explosives against the EDL, civilians. Hence, would-be terrorists.

    Your question implies as if they were not terrorists, and my question of why this wouldn't be terrorism is still not answered.

    Incidentally, I've occasionally referred to soldiers as terrorists. So in a way, I did call them soldiers (but not really, actually).
    pew pew pew
  2. #22
    Join Date Feb 2012
    Location the Netherlands
    Posts 1,145
    Organisation
    Communistisch Platform - Kompas
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    It's a stupid idea. I'm sure the EDL is going to use this as proof that "islamo-fascism" wants to take over Britain.
    Last edited by bad ideas actualised by alcohol; 16th July 2012 at 09:23.
    Is this resistance or a costume party?
    Either way I think black with bandanas is a boring theme.

    fka Creep
  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bad ideas actualised by alcohol For This Useful Post:


  4. #23
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Location UK
    Posts 6,143
    Rep Power 81

    Default

    How so? That Islamists generally have beards? No, because that's correct.
    Devout Muslim men tend to have beards and your flirtation with a stereotype based on your "personal experience" is on the verge of labelling all Muslims with beards as Islamist Jihadists.

    Because they are not an army, obviously. That's like asking me why I'm not calling them doctors since they had knives.
    When is an army an army in your book, when a state says it is? And your analogy with surgeons suggests that you have quite a charitable view of what 'soldiering' entails.

    Terrorism is the employment of violence against a civilian population. They were allegedly going to use explosives against the EDL, civilians. Hence, would-be terrorists.
    OMG and soldiers never do that to civilians!

    Your question implies as if they were not terrorists, and my question of why this wouldn't be terrorism is still not answered.
    Not really, I'm just wondering why you are using the term so uncritically. Your first response was to call these men 'Islamist terrorists', practically writing the headline for your local bourgeois newspaper. And the main problem isn't that you label them as 'terrorist', it is that you assume that any Muslim engaging in an act of terror is an Islamist. For all you know they could be a detachment of misguided but nevertheless hot-shot direct-action anti-fascists, who have all suffered at the hands of the EDL and are out for revenge. But you saw the beards and thought of old Bin Laden, didn't you?

    Incidentally, I've occasionally referred to soldiers as terrorists. So in a way, I did call them soldiers (but not really, actually).
    Cool, so you realise that these labels carry political rather than objective weight.
    Last edited by Hit The North; 11th July 2012 at 08:46.
    "Events have their own logic, even when human beings do not." - Rosa Luxemburg

    "There are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen." - Lenin

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Hit The North For This Useful Post:


  6. #24
    illuminaughty reptillington Committed User
    Join Date Apr 2012
    Location al-Buu r'Qhueque, New Mex
    Posts 1,278
    Organisation
    mayonnaise clinic
    Rep Power 25

    Default

    What I don't understand, why is it when anti-fascists (who are generally not bearded Muslims) undertake an action it is called anti-fascism, yet when bearded Muslim men do it, it is characterized as terrorism?
    An issue of motivation I think, and that's assuming these men were motivated by their religion.. and that's a medium-large if. If the attack was on a synagogue, I'd say there's a good chance of it being an attack of the jihad persuasion. But, considering the anti-goddamneveryone nature of the EDL, I wouldn't quite make such an assumption. I'm glad for what happened regardless.

    disclaimer: I'm talking about these 3 specific Mulsims, *not* Muslims in general. No islamophobia intended.
    BANS GOT YOU PARANOID? I MADE A GROUP FOR YOU! http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1349 NOW OPEN FOR EVERYBODY!!!

    "Think for yourself; question authority."
    - Timothy Lenin
  7. #25
    Join Date May 2010
    Posts 3,617
    Rep Power 66

    Default

    How so? That Islamists generally have beards? No, because that's correct.
    The difference is that you assumed that these guys were Islamists on the basis that they were Muslims with beards. There are plenty of Muslims with beards who aren't Islamists. Its the equivalent of your standard suburban closet racist middle class upstanding citizen saying most criminals are black, therefore I'm going to assume that this black guy is a criminal.
    “How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 6:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?” Charles Bukowski, Factotum
    "In our glorious fight for civil rights, we must guard against being fooled by false slogans, as 'right-to-work.' It provides no 'rights' and no 'works.' Its purpose is to destroy labor unions and the freedom of collective bargaining... We demand this fraud be stopped." MLK
    -fka Redbrother
  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Ocean Seal For This Useful Post:


  9. #26
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Location Oakland, California
    Posts 8,151
    Rep Power 164

    Default

    Why wouldn't this be terrorism?.
    Well what makes it "terrorist" and not a "gang" fight? Why not vigilantism?

    Originally Posted by BBC
    They were arrested in raids last week after police stopped a car on the M1 and found guns, knives, machetes and a home-made explosive device.
    So cops randomly pulled some "suspiciously bearded" men over? Why?

    What does "home-made explosive device" mean? What does "improvised explosive" mean? A car-bomb? A molotov cocktail? A aerosol can and a book of matches near-by? A flaming bag of dog-shit?

    Originally Posted by BBC
    Mr Uddin, Mr Khan and Mr Hasseen are charged under the Terrorism Act 2006, accused of preparing for an act or acts of terrorism with the intention of committing such acts.
    Originally Posted by BBC
    The arrests, by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit, followed a routine police stop of a vehicle on the M1 near Sheffield, South Yorkshire, on 30 June.
    A routine stop? Of immigrants or dark-skinned people? A "counter-terrorism" unit just randomly stops people they think might be terrorists on the road? Were counter-terrorism units stopping people for broken tail-lights and they stumbled on some "terrorists"? Or were they fishing for people they could label as terrorists?

    They could have been "terrorists" but I think things don't quite add up the way the cops and BBC want them to seem.

    In the US this kind of thing (if my suspicions are correct) is called "the war on drugs" and local police forces get federal money based on the amount of drug-convinctions they get. Anti-gang units are formed and basically sweep up black people and pull people over in "routine traffic stops" where they are then allowed to search vehicles for drugs just because someone didn't have proper registration or a working turn signal. 9 out of 10 times they find nothing, but that one time they find some weed or coke, they book the person. The courts see a bunch of people who were caught with drugs come through the system which creates the impression that cops always get the right person. But it's a self-justifying cycle.

    It sounds to me like the UK - or at least this task force - was looking to justify it's anti-terrorism laws and funding.

    That being said, yes if these guys wanted to beat up - or terrorize - the EDL, then it is a useless individualist strategy from a working class perspective.
  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jimmie Higgins For This Useful Post:


  11. #27
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Posts 148
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    Three bearded muslim men, odds are they are Islamists. But you're right that there is a chance they are not.
    Damn dem durty terrrrorirrstts with their beards and their allah worshiping.



    I doubt they were Islamic terrorists. Terrorists in the sense that they were intending to terrorise people, but their motives maybe more against a disgusting organisation that has provoked them.

    This is essentially good propaganda for the EDL, and the 3 men fell into the EDL's trap.
    Workers-Control-Over-ProdWell - normally porn is distributed to viewers... that happen to masturbate to it.

    zeekloid - I watch it for the character development.
  12. #28
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Posts 148
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    Well what makes it "terrorist" and not a "gang" fight? Why not vigilantism?

    So cops randomly pulled some "suspiciously bearded" men over? Why?

    What does "home-made explosive device" mean? What does "improvised explosive" mean? A car-bomb? A molotov cocktail? A aerosol can and a book of matches near-by? A flaming bag of dog-shit?



    A routine stop? Of immigrants or dark-skinned people? A "counter-terrorism" unit just randomly stops people they think might be terrorists on the road? Were counter-terrorism units stopping people for broken tail-lights and they stumbled on some "terrorists"? Or were they fishing for people they could label as terrorists?

    They could have been "terrorists" but I think things don't quite add up the way the cops and BBC want them to seem.

    In the US this kind of thing (if my suspicions are correct) is called "the war on drugs" and local police forces get federal money based on the amount of drug-convinctions they get. Anti-gang units are formed and basically sweep up black people and pull people over in "routine traffic stops" where they are then allowed to search vehicles for drugs just because someone didn't have proper registration or a working turn signal. 9 out of 10 times they find nothing, but that one time they find some weed or coke, they book the person. The courts see a bunch of people who were caught with drugs come through the system which creates the impression that cops always get the right person. But it's a self-justifying cycle.

    It sounds to me like the UK - or at least this task force - was looking to justify it's anti-terrorism laws and funding.

    That being said, yes if these guys wanted to beat up - or terrorize - the EDL, then it is a useless individualist strategy from a working class perspective.

    I've been stopped a few times randomly.....
    Workers-Control-Over-ProdWell - normally porn is distributed to viewers... that happen to masturbate to it.

    zeekloid - I watch it for the character development.
  13. #29
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Location Oakland, California
    Posts 8,151
    Rep Power 164

    Default

    I've been stopped a few times randomly.....
    By an anti-terrorism unit?!
  14. #30
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Posts 148
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    By an anti-terrorism unit?!
    Oh right, not by an anti-terrorism team. I didn't realise that was the case.

    UK's a police state now, so this doesn't surprise me.

    I was once stopped by a team of armed police at an airport because I had a BMX and a BIG bag on me. They asked to check it.


    A pedalling suicide bomber potentialee.
    Workers-Control-Over-ProdWell - normally porn is distributed to viewers... that happen to masturbate to it.

    zeekloid - I watch it for the character development.
  15. #31
    Join Date Jul 2012
    Posts 6
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    This was a sophisticated attempt to target the EDL. These men had access to firearms and other weapongs, along with manufacturing improvised explosive devices. It sounds like terroism to me, and they knew what they were doing. The EDL might be a racist organisation with some extremely nasty individuals, but that doesn't excuse violence.

    They aren't the police and shouldn't be taking matters into their own hand. Secretly the EDL will love this incident because it fuels tension in the community and proves there point that England would be better off without Muslims in the country. This way, everyone suffers and that isn't good.
    "Every reasonable human being should be a moderate Socialist."

    Thomas Mann
  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Leftwinger For This Useful Post:


  17. #32
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 10,392
    Rep Power 188

    Default

    They aren't the police and shouldn't be taking matters into their own hand.
    uh what
    'heavens above, how awful it is to live outside the law - one is always expecting what one rightly deserves.'
    petronius, the satyricon
  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bcbm For This Useful Post:


  19. #33
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Location UK
    Posts 6,143
    Rep Power 81

    Default

    The EDL might be a racist organisation with some extremely nasty individuals, but that doesn't excuse violence.

    They aren't the police and shouldn't be taking matters into their own hand.
    In what sense are you a 'Leftwinger'?
    "Events have their own logic, even when human beings do not." - Rosa Luxemburg

    "There are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen." - Lenin

  20. #34
    Join Date Jan 2012
    Location finland
    Posts 649
    Rep Power 24

    Default

    In what sense are you a 'Leftwinger'?
    In the military academy thread this same fellow thought that it's a good idea to send poor kids off to military academies so that they can use their aggressive energy "for good".

    I don't think we're going to see this guy a lot outside OI in the future
  21. #35
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Location Oakland, California
    Posts 8,151
    Rep Power 164

    Default

    While I don't agree with the post made by Leftwinger, I think we can probably argue against the points made by the new poster before making a judgement about them personally and their whole political worldview.

    With two total posts, it's a bit hard to distinguish "new" from "troll" just yet and such judgements won't phase a troll while it could intimidate an actual "raw" new poster.
  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jimmie Higgins For This Useful Post:


  23. #36
    Join Date Feb 2012
    Location the Netherlands
    Posts 1,145
    Organisation
    Communistisch Platform - Kompas
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    This was a sophisticated attempt to target the EDL. These men had access to firearms and other weapongs, along with manufacturing improvised explosive devices. It sounds like terroism to me, and they knew what they were doing. The EDL might be a racist organisation with some extremely nasty individuals, but that doesn't excuse violence.

    They aren't the police and shouldn't be taking matters into their own hand. Secretly the EDL will love this incident because it fuels tension in the community and proves there point that England would be better off without Muslims in the country. This way, everyone suffers and that isn't good.
    Not taking matters into own hands? Good luck with your socialist revolution!
    Is this resistance or a costume party?
    Either way I think black with bandanas is a boring theme.

    fka Creep
  24. #37
    Join Date Jul 2012
    Posts 6
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    It doesn't bother me if the males are Muslim. No one should be plotting to attack anyone, even if we are talking about the EDL - a racist, far right extremist group full of uneducated, politically naive skinheads, who fuel violent hatred towards Muslims.

    Surely it is left wing to take a disliking towards the EDL, but at the same time call for a stop to any violence and terroism? Is socialism not left wing, just more centre-left, or do posters on here lean more towards the far left? Just trying to find out?
    "Every reasonable human being should be a moderate Socialist."

    Thomas Mann
  25. #38
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Location UK
    Posts 6,143
    Rep Power 81

    Default

    Leftwinger, the problem with this incident isn't that the men were taking things into their own hands. The real problem is the other things you mention: the fact that the act would be more likely to split the working class than bring it together; and the inhumane and disproportionate response: the idiots who populate the EDL probably deserve a good kicking but probably don't deserve being carved up with machetes or blown up with bombs.

    But from the standpoint of being communist revolutionists, we don't condemn actions on the basis of an appeal to the laws of the capitalist state that we oppose and propose the abolition of. That would be daft.
    "Events have their own logic, even when human beings do not." - Rosa Luxemburg

    "There are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen." - Lenin

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hit The North For This Useful Post:


  27. #39
    Join Date Jul 2012
    Posts 6
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I think men like this give Muslims a bad name and make the public think they are all terrorists, especially when you have the BBC article keen to point this out. This is good propaganda for the EDL.
    And yes it isn't good when the working class are split for the communist state that is preached on here. You have the muslims fighting against the EDL, both working class groups. What is wrong with the police? There has to be some law enforcement in this country. I promise you that I'm left wing, isn't socialism part of the whole ideology of a communist revolutionist?
    "Every reasonable human being should be a moderate Socialist."

    Thomas Mann
  28. #40
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 10,392
    Rep Power 188

    Default

    There has to be some law enforcement in this country.
    its only for the rich, acab
    'heavens above, how awful it is to live outside the law - one is always expecting what one rightly deserves.'
    petronius, the satyricon

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 16th February 2012, 10:05
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10th January 2011, 08:05
  3. Venezuela's planned "Communal Parliament": better than soviets?
    By Die Neue Zeit in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 23rd March 2010, 05:23
  4. Israel's new strategy: "sabotage" and "attack" the global justice movement
    By freepalestine in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19th February 2010, 16:07
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th February 2010, 15:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread