personally I applaud anybody who attacks Nazi's and defends their streets and schools from the propganda and presence. So good for those KKE members....
That said....the way this thread is brought is offcourse passive aggressive defense. Which is understandable since the KKE has come under increasing criticism for their actions and behaviour and subsequently politics and tactics.
Rightfully so IMO. But opinions differ.
But the motivation behind the op...well....that leaves a couple of questions...
Now...how and why exactly is it possible for a handful of induvidual KKE members to attack Nazi's at a school and election place...but not in their factories and their demonstrations when in that last place the concern was for the plurality of the strike and argumenst were made that everybody was allowed to speak (this naturally counts more so for elections). Why exactly doesn't this count for the schools and elections in the eyes of the KKE. What is different? Seeing as the KKE places, as a supposed and self proclaimed revolutionary party, a huge amount of energy in focussing on workplace organisation one simply has to wonder why this excluded the kicking out of Nazis?
Where and when exactly did the KKE organise a (clandestine??) militia force to oppose the GD and swipe the streets clean...you know...as party policy to give no platform to Nazi's? Or is this in the process of happening???


