Thread: Why was homosexuality illegal in the Soviet Union during the Stalin era?

Results 1 to 20 of 184

  1. #1
    Join Date Feb 2012
    Posts 142
    Rep Power 0

    Default Why was homosexuality illegal in the Soviet Union during the Stalin era?

    Can you answer that question, marxist-leninists?
  2. The Following User Says Thank You to arilando For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Location U.S.A , Maine
    Posts 6,572
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, Rev-Left Study Guide Project
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    Because he thought is was Western "Bourgeois Decadence." When socialism was built he thought it would go away but when it didn't he brought back the repressive Tsarist laws.

    I honestly do not know which is more absurd: condemning homosexuality bases on what a invisible skyman supposedly said (Religion) or condemning it based on materialist superstition.
    THE REV-LEFT STUDY GUIDE PROJECT
    Contribute today and help facilitate the spread of revolutionary knowledge.
  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to TheGodlessUtopian For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date Apr 2012
    Location SFRY (SRM)
    Posts 14
    Organisation
    KPJ (Communist Party of Yugoslavia
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Should it be legal?

    Come on now, drug addicts should be more legal than the homosexuals.
  6. #4
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location Florida
    Posts 275
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    You also have to recognize it was a different time and era. There were very few memebers of the left that advocated equal rights for homosexuals, it just wasn't an issue that was considered or even brought up often. Some Anarchists were outspoken and supported it (Goldman) and others were against it. A Spanish journalist in the 30s wrote, ""If you are an anarchist, that means that you are more morally upright and physically strong than the average man. And he who likes inverts is no real man, and is therefore no real anarchist." There's been many cases of homosexuals being expelled from communist parties as well (Rene Crevel comes to mind).

    Times are different. Most people of left support equal rights for homosexuals to the fullest extent. The days of 'bourgeois decadence' being seen as the "cause" for homosexuality are, for the most part, over. But I do think that Bob Avakian's party still upholds this idea.
    [FONT=Arial Narrow]"Body tissue deprived of life energy turns cancerous. Cancer is the hysteria of cells condemned to death. Cancer and fascism are closely related. Fascism is the frenzy of sexual cripples. The swastika owes its magnetism to being a symbol of two bodies locked in genital embrace. It all stems from a longing for love. Comrades, make love joyously and without fear."

    [/FONT][FONT=Tahoma]Khrushchev: "It’s interesting, isn’t it? I’m of working class origin while your family were landlords."
    Zhou: "Yes, and we each betrayed our class!"[/FONT]
  7. #5
    Join Date Sep 2011
    Location Virginia
    Posts 207
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    Here's the really short answer: Stalin was a homophobe.

  8. #6
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Location U.S.A , Maine
    Posts 6,572
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, Rev-Left Study Guide Project
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    Times are different. Most people of left support equal rights for homosexuals to the fullest extent. The days of 'bourgeois decadence' being seen as the "cause" for homosexuality are, for the most part, over. But I do think that Bob Avakian's party still upholds this idea.
    No,the RCP supports homosexual liberation now, but the move was somewhat recent (a decade or so ago I believe). However, they never acknowledged that they discriminated against Queer people; one day they were homophobic while the next they were not, no mention has ever been made of the change.

    The Kassma Project has more on this.
    THE REV-LEFT STUDY GUIDE PROJECT
    Contribute today and help facilitate the spread of revolutionary knowledge.
  9. The Following User Says Thank You to TheGodlessUtopian For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Location Eastern Paradise
    Posts 300
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    I don't know much about this, but I think it'd be safe to assume it was at least partially because homosexuality doesn't increase population, right? Wasn't abortion a punishable offense, as well?
    "Nothing is more terrible than the logic of selfishness." -Karl Marx

    "The founders of Marxism cautioned that one should not believe 'what each age claims and boasts about itself.' Of course this must apply also to Marxist historians."
  11. The Following User Says Thank You to The Young Pioneer For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Location U.S.A , Maine
    Posts 6,572
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, Rev-Left Study Guide Project
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    I don't know much about this, but I think it'd be safe to assume it was at least partially because homosexuality doesn't increase population, right? Wasn't abortion a punishable offense, as well?
    Such is usually the justification, yes. I would be surprised, however, if such was the extent of why Stalin was such a reactionary in regards to human rights.
    THE REV-LEFT STUDY GUIDE PROJECT
    Contribute today and help facilitate the spread of revolutionary knowledge.
  13. The Following User Says Thank You to TheGodlessUtopian For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Join Date Oct 2011
    Location UK
    Posts 84
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    You also have to recognize it was a different time and era.
    True though this is, it didn't stop homosexuality being lawful when Lenin was leader. I'm not sure I buy the "It didn't increase population" defence.
  15. #10
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location Ireland
    Posts 817
    Rep Power 24

    Default

    It has to be understood in context, it's no coincidence that a whole bunch of progressive positions just happened to be swept away at the same time all semblance of democracy ceased to be and at the time leading bolsheviks were executed en masse.

    Before Stalin's clique rose to power the bolsheviks had some pretty fucked views about homosexuality but it was a conscious decision to make it legal, i mention this only to preempt the inevitable apologism to come of 'the bolsheviks didn't really make homosexuality legal they just abolished the czarist legal code'

    "[Soviet legislation] declares the absolute non-interference of the state and society into sexual matters, so long as nobody is injured and no one’s interests are encroached upon. Concerning homosexuality, sodomy, and various other forms of sexual gratification, which are set down in European legislation as offences against morality--Soviet legislation treats these exactly as so-called 'natural' intercourse. All forms of sexual intercourse are private matters." - Dr. Grigorii Batkis (director Moscow Institute of Social Hygiene), The Sexual Revolution in Russia, 1923. [Emphasis in original]
    "But like Trotskyites working with fascists in the USSR to plant no warning bombs to rip out the lungs of Soviet children from their tiny rib cages you will probably choose to turn a blind eye." - RedSunRising

    RIP tech,you will be missed

    Marxist Book Resource
  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aurora For This Useful Post:


  17. #11
    Join Date Aug 2011
    Location Melbourne, Australia
    Posts 146
    Rep Power 9

    Default

    I don't know much about this, but I think it'd be safe to assume it was at least partially because homosexuality doesn't increase population, right? Wasn't abortion a punishable offense, as well?
    It's the same justification the Christian right uses today. They claim marriage is for making babies and gays can't do that. The justification is weak now and it was weak back then. Though it does reveal a lot about how the Christian right views sex, relationships and women.
    Stalin got it wrong. A million deaths under socialism is an atrocity. A million deaths under capitalism is a statistic.

    'Trotsky explained that a nationalised planned economy needs democracy as the human body needs oxygen.' Alan Woods in a summary of The Revolution Betrayed
  18. #12
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    stalin needed babies to eat
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath


  19. #13
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location London
    Posts 592
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Well they changed a bunch of stuff to encourage people to have big families so they thought the good ol' "swallow your gayness and get a wife" line would help increase their numbers as well. Maybe Stalin was just a frustrated man in denial of his own sexuality...
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Politics For Dummies (Brainwashed Capitalist Edition)[/FONT]

    [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Socialism: any country providing free healthcare for its citizens.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Communism: a dictatorship providing free healthcare for its citizens.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Anarchism: a system involving no government, invented by the Sex Pistols.[/FONT]

    Political compass:
    Social: -957 million
    Economic: -55 billion
  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanky Wanker For This Useful Post:


  21. #14
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Posts 183
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    It seems like accusing Peter The Great for not being "democratic". Most here forgot that some decade before that, sexuality of woman had been considered "abnormal, obscene" even in the US. Women also has sexual desires has been "discovered" in those times.
    During the medieval era, in the middle east, it's pretty common for a father to gift his son a donkey for animal sex. Well, I want to know how many liberal "democratic" countries today will allow it? If not, what kind of phobic those rulers are?
  22. #15
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Location Illinois, USA
    Posts 2,708
    Rep Power 57

    Default

    During the medieval era, in the middle east, it's pretty common for a father to gift his son a donkey for animal sex.
    Cite, please. Sounds like bullshit
  23. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Robocommie For This Useful Post:


  24. #16
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location London
    Posts 592
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    During the medieval era, in the middle east, it's pretty common for a father to gift his son a donkey for animal sex.
    Are there any places that I could go to find some of these fathers nowadays? I won't make a habit of it, I swear.
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Politics For Dummies (Brainwashed Capitalist Edition)[/FONT]

    [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Socialism: any country providing free healthcare for its citizens.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Communism: a dictatorship providing free healthcare for its citizens.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS] Anarchism: a system involving no government, invented by the Sex Pistols.[/FONT]

    Political compass:
    Social: -957 million
    Economic: -55 billion
  25. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Lanky Wanker For This Useful Post:


  26. #17
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Location Eastern Paradise
    Posts 300
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    I wasn't trying to justify/defend banning it 'cause it doesn't increase population. I was simply guessing that this could've been part of the reason it was outlawed.

    ...To clarify.
    "Nothing is more terrible than the logic of selfishness." -Karl Marx

    "The founders of Marxism cautioned that one should not believe 'what each age claims and boasts about itself.' Of course this must apply also to Marxist historians."
  27. The Following User Says Thank You to The Young Pioneer For This Useful Post:


  28. #18
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    During the medieval era, in the middle east, it's pretty common for a father to gift his son a donkey for animal sex.
    implying they didn't do the same thing with sheep in europe

    e: still do
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  29. #19
    Join Date Jun 2008
    Location Stalingrad
    Posts 1,424
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    Because if decadent homosexuals were allowed to marry, sissiness would infect the soviet man like a virus and the USSR would lose WW2. But of course that's what the Trotskyite revisionists wanted.
    "Machinery in itself is a victory of man over the forces of nature, but in the hands of capital it makes man the slave of those forces" - Uncle Karl
  30. #20
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location Scotland
    Posts 1,898
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Should it be legal?

    Come on now, drug addicts should be more legal than the homosexuals.
    Wut?
  31. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Rooster For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 1st March 2011, 03:43
  2. Replies: 100
    Last Post: 15th November 2009, 04:47
  3. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 15th June 2005, 02:16
  4. The Soviet Union and the Stalin Question
    By Comrade Marcel in forum Practice
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st February 2004, 05:20
  5. The Soviet Union and the Stalin Question
    By Comrade Marcel in forum Practice
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28th January 2004, 07:50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts