Thread: Why was homosexuality illegal in the Soviet Union during the Stalin era?

Results 41 to 60 of 184

  1. #41
    Rroftë partia! შავი მერცხალი Committed User
    Join Date Feb 2011
    Posts 1,768
    Rep Power 33

    Default

    With the question of homosexuality and other social questions in the Soviet Union,usualy comes the question of abortion,and why it was 'banned' . The answer is not because "Glorious Soviet state was controlled by Stalin and he hated abortion" but because there was a real existing problem of the birth rates,and,like the question of homosexuality,the question of abortion in 1936,can't be pulled out of the time frame,and criticized from the modern perspective.

    This is a common explanation.

    - In 1936, in view of the rising standard of welfare of the people, the government passed a law prohibiting abortion, at the same time adopting an extensive program for the building of maternity homes, nurseries, milk centers and kindergartens. In 1936, 2,174,000,000 rubles were assigned for these measures, as compared with 875 million rubles in 1935. A law was passed providing for considerable grants to large families. Grants to a total of over one billion rubles were made in 1937 under this law. Commission of the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U. (B.), Ed. History of the CPSU (Bolsheviks): Short Course. Moscow: FLPH, 1939, p. 340
  2. #42
    Join Date May 2007
    Posts 4,669
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    The thread is about homosexuality, though, which I can assure you wasn't made illegal based on birth rates. The issue of abortion, for what it's worth, was actually popularly debated at the time, with all sorts of opinions coming forth from across the country (see Sarah Davies' Popular Opinion in Stalin's Russia, pp. 65-68.)
    * h0m0revolutionary: "neo-liberalism can deliver healthy children, it can educate them, it can feed them, it can clothe them and leave them fully contented."
    * rooster: "Supporting [anti-imperialism] is reactionary. How is any nation supposed to stand up [to] the might of the US anyway?"
    * nizan: "Fuck your education is empowerment bullshit, education is alienation, nothing more. You indulge in a dying prestige for a role in a bureaucratic spectacle deserving of nothing beyond contempt."
    * Alexios: "To the Board Administration: Ismail [...] needs to be eliminated from this forum."
  3. #43
    Rroftë partia! შავი მერცხალი Committed User
    Join Date Feb 2011
    Posts 1,768
    Rep Power 33

    Default

    The thread is about homosexuality, though, which I can assure you wasn't made illegal based on birth rates. That never came up in discussions. The issue of abortion, for what it's worth, was actually popularly debated at the time, with all sorts of opinions coming forth from across the country (see Sarah Davies' Popular Opinion in Stalin's Russia, pp. 65-68.)
    Well,sorry for the interuption,but the two (Homosexuality/Abortion) usually come up in pair when people criticize the Soviet society.

    When i mentioned the problems with the birth rates,i linked it with abortion,not homosexuality.

    And yes,for an example,many doctors were involved in the debate around the abortion discussion,and many other specialists.

    The point is that it's pointless and a loss of time to criticize the decisions made in the '30 looking from a modern-day perspective.And it's even worse to criticize a political ideology based on a decision made so many years ago,because,a contemporary Marxist-Leninist state would obviously make different decisions.
  4. #44
    Join Date May 2008
    Location Everett, WA, USA
    Posts 2,467
    Organisation
    Communist Labor Party
    Rep Power 68

    Default

    People lost their moral in this world long time ago. So you don't care if that happens one more time. There will always be mutants that cannot be called human being. First, racists than nationalists, than homo/bisexuals, than transgenders.. and so on.
    So you're saying LGBT people are sub-humans? Thanks for sharing, but this is a revolutionary forum, not a reactionary one.
    "I have declared war on the rich who prosper on our poverty, the politicians who lie to us with smiling faces, and all the mindless, heartless robots who protect them and their property." - Assata Shakur
  5. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Danielle Ni Dhighe For This Useful Post:


  6. #45
    Join Date Apr 2005
    Location In Partibus Infidelium
    Posts 4,829
    Organisation
    Workers Party in America
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    So you're saying LGBT people are sub-humans? Thanks for sharing, but this is a revolutionary forum, not a reactionary one.
    If you want to continue this conversation with him, you'll have to do it in OI.

  7. #46
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 2,454
    Rep Power 60

    Default

    Why is it a "massive, improbable if"? What gay rights movement existed in Russia? What Russian communist supported gay rights at the time?
    Why then was it made legal almost immediately after the revolution then made illegal again under Stalin?

    It's not like no one thought that. It was legalized then RE-illegalized under a different leadership.
    Last edited by Leftsolidarity; 5th April 2012 at 23:58.
    Freedom before Peace
  8. #47
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 946
    Rep Power 37

    Default

    Why then was it made legal almost immediately after the revolution then made illegal again under Stalin?

    It's not like no one thought that. It was legalized the RE-illegalized under a different leadership.
    The constitution was scrapped, so it was 'legalized.'
  9. #48
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location USA
    Posts 1,467
    Organisation
    Illuminati
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    You know, if Stalin actually had eaten a few infants back in the day I bet M-Ls would defend him for it.
  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Yuppie Grinder For This Useful Post:


  11. #49
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Location Poop
    Posts 1,159
    Organisation
    Poop
    Rep Power 28

    Default

    Stalin did his best in this case.

    People lost their moral in this world long time ago. So you don't care if that happens one more time. There will always be mutants that cannot be called human being. First, racists than nationalists, than homo/bisexuals, than transgenders.. and so on.

    The most residual states are really good about it. One of good points, and there come you liberals to free them like in Libya. I'm sure that there in some 20-30 years of American influence, gays will show up.
    You should probably go and kill yourself. That would make the world a much better place if you and fucking morons like you weren't in it. The only good bigot is a dead bigot.
    "The exploited are not carriers of any positive project, be it even the classless society (which all too closely resembles the productive set up). Capital is their only community. They can only escape by destroying everything that makes them exploited...Capitalism has not created the conditions of its overcoming in communism-the famous bourgeoisie forging the arms of its own extinction-but of a world of horrors." -At Daggers Drawn

    "Our strategy is therefore the following: to establish and maintain a series of centers of desertion, or poles of secession, of rallying points. For runaways. For those who leave. A series of places where we can escape from the influence of a civilization that is headed for the abyss." -Tiqqun, Call
  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Brosa Luxemburg For This Useful Post:


  13. #50
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location USA
    Posts 1,467
    Organisation
    Illuminati
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    You should probably go and kill yourself. That would make the world a much better place if you and fucking morons like you weren't in it. The only good bigot is a dead bigot.
    Absolutely not OK, dude.
  14. #51
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 2,454
    Rep Power 60

    Default

    Absolutely not OK, dude.
    I thought it sounded pretty ok to me...

    but anyhow, this is off topic
    Freedom before Peace
  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Leftsolidarity For This Useful Post:


  16. #52
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Location U.S.A , Maine
    Posts 6,572
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, Rev-Left Study Guide Project
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    No death wishes please, makes the forum look less vicious.lol
    THE REV-LEFT STUDY GUIDE PROJECT
    Contribute today and help facilitate the spread of revolutionary knowledge.
  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheGodlessUtopian For This Useful Post:


  18. #53
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Location Poop
    Posts 1,159
    Organisation
    Poop
    Rep Power 28

    Default

    Sorry, read it and got a little angry. I am straight, but one of my best friends is gay and it pissed me off to no end to read such an ignorant and arrogant comment by some dipshit.
    "The exploited are not carriers of any positive project, be it even the classless society (which all too closely resembles the productive set up). Capital is their only community. They can only escape by destroying everything that makes them exploited...Capitalism has not created the conditions of its overcoming in communism-the famous bourgeoisie forging the arms of its own extinction-but of a world of horrors." -At Daggers Drawn

    "Our strategy is therefore the following: to establish and maintain a series of centers of desertion, or poles of secession, of rallying points. For runaways. For those who leave. A series of places where we can escape from the influence of a civilization that is headed for the abyss." -Tiqqun, Call
  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brosa Luxemburg For This Useful Post:


  20. #54
    Live Long, and Share Capital Committed User
    Join Date Sep 2011
    Location usa
    Posts 1,350
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    Your not making rational arguments. It is not great dissent, it is not unusual to see a brief period of injustices as the government tries to quell the unrest. Once this was over, there was little reason to retract the law as LGBTs were part of the unrest. The law was kept as a way to quell future uprisings, if they were to occur.

    There is a certain point that I'm going to point out that will change the outlook of this. Even though Homosexuality was punishable with up to 5 years of hard labor, it was rarely enforced. It was only enforced as a smoke-screen law to punish dissidence.
    I'm still waiting for you to tell myself and everyone here why it's okay to enact bigoted laws to cover up the murdering of political dissidents.
    Society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand. ~ Karl Marx


    The state is the intermediary between man and human liberty. ~ Marx

    formerly Triceramarx
  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to The Jay For This Useful Post:


  22. #55
    Join Date Aug 2011
    Location Michigan, U$A
    Posts 1,252
    Rep Power 20

    Default

    It was an time a long ago. Morals were different.

    However I do think that those particular policies of Stalin were wrong and/or miss leaded. But over the years people learn and people know. And when a Marxist-Leninist Government is established such laws will not be created.
    i.e. Past Marxist-Leninist countries didn't make such laws.

    And on another note it wasn't about birth rates
    Yes, we want to make your wife a radical feminist lesbian, we want to forcibly gay marry you to a leatherclad bear, we want to send your kids into white slavery at the court of a black communist dictator, we want to paint your church red with the blood of christian babies, we want to set fire to your ikea and your SUV, we want to rape your labrador with the broken pieces of your white picketed fence.

    We want to wage nuclear war on the nuclear family.
    why? because we are pinko freedom hating commienazi atheist bastards, its just what we do.
    ~psycho
  23. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bostana For This Useful Post:


  24. #56
    Live Long, and Share Capital Committed User
    Join Date Sep 2011
    Location usa
    Posts 1,350
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    It was an time a long ago. Morals were different.

    However I do think that those particular policies of Stalin were wrong and/or miss leaded. But over the years people learn and people know. And when a Marxist-Leninist Government is established such laws will not be created.
    i.e. Past Marxist-Leninist countries didn't make such laws.

    And on another note it wasn't about birth rates
    I don't buy the 'morals were different' argument, but I'm glad that you condemn Stalin's actions.
    Society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand. ~ Karl Marx


    The state is the intermediary between man and human liberty. ~ Marx

    formerly Triceramarx
  25. The Following User Says Thank You to The Jay For This Useful Post:


  26. #57
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location USA
    Posts 1,467
    Organisation
    Illuminati
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    It was an time a long ago. Morals were different.
    Riveting argument.
    If you said the same thing about any other sort of despot you'd get restricted.
  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yuppie Grinder For This Useful Post:


  28. #58
    Join Date Mar 2011
    Location Mississippi
    Posts 68
    Rep Power 9

    Default

    It was done mainly out of ignorance at the time and still traditionally held views about homosexuality. It was often viewed as a "bourgeois decadence."

    Even though this was a common viewpoint at the time, Stalin and the Soviet government were still wrong to implement such a law.

    We should seek to understand the times in which this law was enacted and the world at said time, but we shouldn't defend it.
    "If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything." - Malcolm X
  29. #59
    Join Date Mar 2012
    Posts 183
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Cite, please. Sounds like bullshit
    Here it is! Just read it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histori...s_on_zoophilia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia
    Bestiality was accepted in some cultures indigenously, such as North America and the Middle East.[79] Sexual intercourse between humans and non-human animals was common among Native American tribes such as the Hopi Indians.[80] Voget describes the sexual lives of young Native Americans as "rather inclusive," including bestiality.[80] In addition, the Copper Inuit people had "no aversion to intercourse with live animals".[80]
  30. #60
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    It was an time a long ago. Morals were different
    yo but years prior the state's line was officially 'what goes on in the bedroom is private'.

    i don't think the 'it was a different time' thing flies, honestly.
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to #FF0000 For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 1st March 2011, 03:43
  2. Replies: 100
    Last Post: 15th November 2009, 04:47
  3. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 15th June 2005, 02:16
  4. The Soviet Union and the Stalin Question
    By Comrade Marcel in forum Practice
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st February 2004, 05:20
  5. The Soviet Union and the Stalin Question
    By Comrade Marcel in forum Practice
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28th January 2004, 07:50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts