Skepticism is reactionary, eh?
Neither the "holocaust happened" nor the "holocaust didn't happen" side has convinced me, and both sides are riddled with many holes in their arguments. Someone, somewhere has fucked something up, and it's been like a long game of telephone, and everybody's story is now completely different on either side, and now I can't believe either side with 100% certainty. Of course I'm more inclined to believe that it happened, but I cannot be certain about the details of it, so I remain agnostic about the whole situation because without certainty or at least a reasonable doubt, I have nothing to base my beliefs on. This doesn't sound irrational, does it?
Your agnosticism is pointless when it comes to this matter, I know you are inclined towards the view that it did happen but why have even the smallest doubt that it didn't happen? That sounds pretty reactionary if you ask me.
[FONT="Arial Black"]Our lives are rivers, gliding free
To that unfathomed, boundless sea,
The silent grave!
Thither all earthly pomp and boast
Roll, to be swallowed up and lost
In one dark wave. - Jorge Manrique[/FONT]