How many M-Ls here are Hoxhaists, Maoists, etc?

[G4b3n]

Of course not, but i think that there are too many small groups which are basically invisible and are not even organized in the Leninist sense of the word, yet they criticize everything, from various positions, but do nothing in practice. And currently, the international workers movement is so dissorganized and ruined, that we all have to start over, in the organizational way, because there are hardly a couple of real revolutionary parties in the world. On the other hand, strict ideological policy for the party members is needed, and the main ideology should be Marxism-Leninism, not Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

On the other hand, would i fight MLM's at the present situation? Of course not.

But parties are, for an example, me and, let's say, 15 of my friends can create the most ideologically pure ML organization in the world, we can follow the lines of our classics in every aspect, but what worth would that be if we don't have any revolutionary practice? Nothing. We have to combine revolutionary theory, and revolutionary practice.

Did i say i am better than you? Why are you speaking in such an uncomradely manner? I have many great ML comrades here, why would i think i am better? I am not. It's just that i think forum activity has very little worth, and there are people (ML') who think it's a good substitute for activity, and that is not true. Leave sectarian, dogmatic, endless debates for the hordes of "ultra-leftists" here. We can see such an example a couple of posts above this one, although the Trotskyite read my message, he ignored it's content and asked me pointless, dumb, sectarian questions, mostly about history. Don't be like him.

In fact, it would be best for all ML's here, like comrade Ismail said, to help each others learn and progress, and not be active in silly debates like "DID STALIN KILL 143261163576124123414 PEOPLE?!?!? PS: DEATH TO STATES LONG LIVE FREEDOM - A - "

I hope we cleared this little misunderstanding.

I wish all the best to all of you comrades.

Why must you get into a rant about sectarianism and then smear anarchists at the end, as if we are a group of Utopian children, something that his been implied over and over again, especially from the more "Stalinist" section of the MLs.

[Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist]

Why must you get into a rant about sectarianism and then smear anarchists at the end, as if we are a group of Utopian children, something that his been implied over and over again, especially from the more "Stalinist" section of the MLs.

Indeed, this view is inconsistent with Marxism-Leninism, which holds that Anarchism represents an ideological strain within the working class movement and must be struggled against on a principled basis. To quote Stalin:

"We are not the kind of people who, when the word "anarchism" is mentioned, turn away contemptuously and say with a supercilious wave of the hand: "Why waste time on that, it's not worth talking about!" We think that such cheap "criticism" is undignified and useless. Nor are we the kind of people who console themselves with the thought that the Anarchists "have no masses behind them and, therefore, are not so dangerous." It is not who has a larger or smaller "mass" following today, but the essence of the doctrine that matters. If the "doctrine" of the Anarchists expresses the truth, then it goes without saying that it will certainly hew a path for itself and will rally the masses around itself.

~Stalin, from Marxism or Anarchism

[Omsk]

Why must you get into a rant about sectarianism and then smear anarchists at the end, as if we are a group of Utopian children, something that his been implied over and over again, especially from the more "Stalinist" section of the MLs.

I am criticizing the sectarianism which comes from ML's, i just mentioned anarchism because most of the anarchists here, on this forum are like that, in fact, most of the anarchists which i know are like that - they are dogmatic and sectarian.

The quote which the user above me posted is of course, correct. However, i was just joking, unless he thinks that we should "struggle against anarchism on a principled basis" - on an internet forum, which is basically useless, and not a struggle. (And we can't gain anything from that struggle)