I don't know what your point is in just Posting this link without any comments. 'Rootless' cosmopolitan' is a code word for Jew.
Devrim
Results 1 to 20 of 70
Bourgeois Cosmopolitanism and its reactionary role
F.Chernov
http://marxism.halkcephesi.net/F%20C...nov-toc-e.html
I don't know what your point is in just Posting this link without any comments. 'Rootless' cosmopolitan' is a code word for Jew.
Devrim
#FF0000, Искра, Agent Equality, Aurora, bcbm, Catmatic Leftist, CleverTitle, ComradeMan, danyboy27, Dunk, EvilRedGuy, hatzel, Jose Gracchus, Le Libérer, Luc, Os Cangaceiros, Rafiq, Raúl Duke, RED DAVE, S.Artesian, Sinister Cultural Marxist, Sugarnotch, the last donut of the night, thefinalmarch, Zanthorus
I didn't know if anyone would even respond.
Is it?![]()
wow thats just nationalism and pretty disgusting at that. more viel stuff from this:
internationalism? nowhere to be found.
All i want is a Marxist Hunk.
It is true that labor produces for the rich wonderful things – but for the worker it produces privation. It produces palaces – but for the worker, hovels. It produces beauty – but for the worker, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back into barbarous types of labor and it turns the other section into a machine. It produces intelligence – but for the worker, stupidity, cretinism.
Wer hat uns verraten? Sozialdemokraten!
All i want is a Marxist Hunk.
It is true that labor produces for the rich wonderful things – but for the worker it produces privation. It produces palaces – but for the worker, hovels. It produces beauty – but for the worker, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back into barbarous types of labor and it turns the other section into a machine. It produces intelligence – but for the worker, stupidity, cretinism.
Wer hat uns verraten? Sozialdemokraten!
I hope tir1944 is banned for antisemitism.
Generally people respond more when you explain why you have linked to a piece, and what you opinion of it is.
Yes, as others have pointed out. I only looked at the first few paragraphs of the article, but it seems to be a theoretical justification for a campaign against jewish intellectuals.
Devrim
Nah.
But either way this article is pretty interesting, at least in how the writer blasts a "rootless cosmopolitan" for writing from a perspective that promotes 'servility to all things foreign' and then talks about how racist Germany was in the next sentence.
I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
Collective Bruce Banner shit
FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath
Are you trolling or what?
Where did i say anthing even remotely antisemitic?
Also nice try at quoting WIKIPEDIA FFS.
One of the most prominent "rootless cosmopolitans" was A.Ahmatova-an ethnic Russian.Was it really a campaign directed against all Jewish intellectuals,or was it a campaign against "rootless cosmopolitans",some of whom happened to be ethnically Jewish?
Anway,i posted this to see what people here think of it.
Well it was sort of like the Decossackization carried out by Lenin. It wasn't carried out because they were undesirable or inferior, but because they rejected soviet authority (though admittedly, Jewish Intellectuals weren't really against Stalin, it was just that they became too independent and had to be put back in their place).
No, I just don't like you.
That's all good and well,you're free not to like me,however that doesn't mean that you can falsely accuse me of racism or what not...
Actually I'm accusing you of parroting Stalinist, anti-Semitic bullshit. I don't think you're anti-Semitic yourself, but by parroting this kinda shit people can misunderstand your actual views and that can lead to consequences for you that I wouldn't exactly be opposed to...
No,you accused me of antisemitism.
That's why i reported you.
Such accusations are not treated lightly.As Stalin said:"antisemitism is counterrevolutionary".
Also please keep your prejudice and misconceptions for yourself and focus on the topic.
What "kinda shit"?
What are you trying to say?
Tir has posted this nonsense before, or at least an article very similar to it. it makes as little sense now as when I first read it.
What the fuck does opposing "cosmopolitanism" have to do with the working class struggle? What is wrong with a cosmopolitan culture? What, is the socialist movement supposed to repress migrant workers who speak a foreign language? Or firebomb the temples of foreign religions? What is this crypto-racist nonsense? While I can't say with certainty that the author had a real racist motive in mind, the language he uses reminds me a lot of those Russians who beat up/kill Chechens and other "foreigners" for making the "mistake" of living in Moscow ...
Now, this is a funny quote from the article:
It is utterly anti-materialist. "Those scientists are bourgeois so their results must be wrong, our Russian scientists are not bourgeois so they can ignore the result of those bourgeois scientists!"
EDIT: I did a quick google search and the term "Michurnism" referenced in that quote is actually a reference to Lysenko's interpretation of genetics. That is wonderful proof that this article is crazy propagandistic word soup and is many decades outdated. Basically the article is opposing good science because "bourgeois" people came up with it while presumably Michurin and Lysenko were good "proletarians".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Vl...ovich_Michurin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
To paraphrase the Soviet argument for Lysenkoism: "GENETICS IS AGAINST THE WORKING CLASS *garblegarblegarble* ..." To know how legit the argument of the paper is, we only need to look at the fact that it endorses a scientific view which turned out to be mistaken because the alternative theory view was pushed by "cosmopolitan" people or whatever. Whatever good or bad science was behind Lysenko and the genetic theories became lost behind the ideological nonsense and propaganda.
Last edited by Sinister Cultural Marxist; 30th October 2011 at 17:14.
Socialist Party of Outer Space
A tract from the hey-day of the anti-Semitic drive, that cost many Soviet Jews their lives. "Rootless cosmopolitan" was a code word for Jews, in the tradition of the right-wing anti-Semites. The garbage about "a new kind of nationalism," "typical virtues of the Great-Russian," etc. is yet again, right-wing blather, opposed to the basic Marxist tenet of Internationalism.
Leave it to a zombie Marxist-Leninist, to rebroadcast this nationalist-anti-semitic garbage that was part of a campaign that included mass murder, as if it were a great truth of socialism.
But --- Stalin was alive in 1949! It must be God's own word!
The US state doesn't have any rights except for being abolished and replaced by a socialist state. - azula
"Cosmopolitanism"--isn't that what that Stormfront-breakaway group of American nazbols, "Socialist Phalanx" or whatever it calls itself, uses as its all-purpose denunciation?
Have you read the article?
No,however that doesn't have anything to do with our subject.After all the USSR included numerous peoples.
I ask you,where do you see "crypto-racism"?
So the author is a Russian chauvinist?
Also where does he mention violence against Chechens or any other people in this text?
Where exactly do you see antisemitism in this text.
Because,if this is indeed true,then lot of things have to be revised.
Take a look at the very first page, where they "uncovered a group of theater critics, of rootless cosmopolitans."
"rootless-cosmopolitan" Lev Subotsky -- a Jew
"notorious cosmopolitan" Yuzovsky -- a Jew
"rootless-cosmopolitan" Gurvich -- a Jew
"harmful antipatriotic, cosmopolitan ideas" Kryvyelov -- a Jew
Place it in the context of what was happening -- murder of Jews including prominent Jews such as Solomon Mikhoels, Peretz Markish, David Bergelson, Itzik Fefer.
When charged, the charge would include "bourgeois nationalism," -- and this work is titled, "bourgeois cosmopolitanism."
The anti-semitism was so obvious that the CPUSA charged the CPSU with anti-semitism: 'Our National Committee charges the leadership of the Soviet Union with anti-Semitism, the violation of a basic socialist ethic and a grave threat to the world Communist movement.' -- Howard Fast, author of Spartacus.
You might want to know that this article was also posted on Stormfront along with another article from the Stalin-anti-Jew times. [Edit: the stormfront link somehow doesn't paste, but if you google it you will find it]
The US state doesn't have any rights except for being abolished and replaced by a socialist state. - azula
Again,the question is were they murdered for being Jews,or were they murdered for other reasons.
I mean,if the Stalinist leadership was antisemitic,how come,let's say,Kaganovich,remained among the closest associates of the Gensek J.V.?
Also keep in mind that there were lots of ethnically Jewish people among the ranks of intelligentsia,that's why all this might look sinister and racist.But that is absolutely not the case.Again,remember my remark about A.Ahmatova etc?
However you still haven't provided no solid proof of this alleged "antisemitism".
No,there was no CPSU until 1954 IIRC.
It was called (in Russian) SKP(b).
Also that party was accused of pretty much everything,from antisemitism to being an agent of "judeo-bolshevism",so i don't really see your point.
Anyway:J.V. Stalin