No. Just no. The state CANNOT 100% KNOW that anyone did anything. There have been many many innocent people released under the Innocence Project http://www.innocenceproject.org/ whom the state had convicted because the state was 100% convinced they knew the truth. This because Innocence Project attorneys went back and used DNA evidence to prove their innocence and other methods.
Also, here where I live in the Death Penalty capital of the world the Houston Police Crime Lab was actually SHUT DOWN by the federal government because they had falsified so many DNA tests.
Also here in Texas if the prosecutor has exculpatory evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exculpatory_evidence he does NOT have to give it to the defendant! I saw an interview of the Harris County District Attorney (Chuck Rosenthal) several years back where a reporter asked him why he didn't give the defendant the exculpatory evidence in a particular case which most likely would have led to his release, Chuck Rosenthal actually LAUGHED on camera and said, "because he wasn't entitled to it" (by law). See? It doesn't matter to the state whether you're guilty or not. What matters is the prosecutor's record of wins/losses. And if they have to lie, falsify DNA evidence, intimidate witnesses, they will do it.
While I'm at it, if you think DNA tests are 100% accurate, you're wrong. They are so easily falsifiable. And in some cases, even when performed correctly can have errors as much as 1:7000.



Partija Rada (Party of Labour)
