This is partly in response to something I saw Dhul Fiqar write and mostly to do with my own interest.
He/she said that travel outside our own solar system is effectively nigh on impossible lest we come up with a radical change in technology. I'm no expert but itsn't our or any solar system the place where a Suns infulence spreads, when that infulence stops you've left the solar system? I might be wrong on that so dont bite. Now Voyager 1 and 2 have allready effectively bypassed Pluto and thus have left our Solar System, they were launched in the late 1970's.
Ofcourse it's very different from leaving our Suns infulence to getting to another Solar System (I think!
. But I'm pretty sure the folks at NASA and elswhere are working on forms of craft that are effectively powered by the Suns rays, making travel to say Alpha Centuria possible in merely a few decades.
To say it's impossible that mankind will conquer the stars I think is wrong. It was once deemed impossible to fly, it once took weeks to cross the Atlantic, etc. If the Space race of the 1960's had continued at it's pace we'd most likely have something like Odyssey 2001 type technology in space. Show a man from 1939 what man was capable of by 1969 he'd be amazed, show someone from 1969 where the Space programme was by 2003 and he/she be pretty dissapointed. It's all to do with motivation.
If the U$ thought for a second that someone was going to threaten 'their interests' (be it comercial, military, presitge) in space then they would soon give NASA the bucks. I heard China has even been bosting that the first human on Mars is going to be Chinese, given that China is a risiing superpower this could kick of a new space race. Which would mean technology going forward at a faster rate than it has been for the last 30 years. A better example would be scientists discovering untapped Oil on Mars and then the stars and stripes would be there by 2005.
How would and should a Communist society deal with the question of the stars? Would it be deemed morally and ethically wrong to even terraform a planet? Say if we in the distant future we came across a part of the Galaxy packed with life, with technology ranging from 19th Century Earth's to far more advanced. None of the races are a threat to Earth's little Galatic Soviet Republic some could be in the future, but is it right to go and try and liberate the various working class and peasant equivalents.
Do we say 'screw a prime directive' type thing we might regret not getting involved in the future? Or say we cant get involved for reasons that yet we dont really appreciate or understand? Afterall no one has bothered to contact us (working under the presumption there is life out there), maybe they fear that we are the only race not to give up that thing called religion after learning how to read and write. Are we a possible danger and threat?
Afterall if our future Galatic Soviet Republic watched a society which took far longer than anyone else in the Galaxy to abolish slavery, to stop waging war, to be prone to launching genocide on our own, to still be fighting over religion, to be capable of primitive space travel but still have one in six starving, and whose leading power seemed to be so arrogant with all that 'destiny' crap. Would you want them to join the 'club'? They may have sufficient technology but all the other races you've seen abolished their sought of behaviour centuries before.
A far more likely opition is to take the option of making sure these guys never, ever become a threat. Either by making sure they never come into contact with you, or better yet anouncing your presence to them by destroying their space facilities and declaring any attempt at future space travel will be met with the destruction of the planet.
Sounds cruel and Imperialist? Well what if it was a Earth where the Nazis had won the war?
'What is 11 million dollars compared to the love of 11 million Cubans' Felix Savon
''That morning, my father took my hand and we went out. I saw how upset all the Algerians looked and how the French were rejoicing. I asked my father what had happened. He gravely replied: 'Stalin is dead...' I asked who Stalin was. My father said: 'He was the greatest man of our time. He was the leader of the Soviet Union, the greatest revolutionary country. Stalin was the son of a cobbler.' And I thought the son of a cobbler, someone like me...' Algerian Revolutionary in fight against French Imperialism.
The World Revolution is ongoing history. Even if you win the war, which I don’t think you will, the World Revolution will not and cannot be stooped by military means, Your very powerful army can do much harm to us, can kill many of our people - but it cannot kill ideas! Its movement might seem dormant to you at the moment, but it s there and will come to the fore again out of the awakening of the poor, the downtrodden orginary people the world over in Africa, the Americas, in Asia and Europe too. People in their masses will one day understand that it is the power of capital over them which not only oppresses and robs them, but stifles their human potential, which either uses or discards them as mere pawns to make monetary profit out of the,. Once the people grasp that idea, it will mature into an almost material force in popular uprisings like spreading wildfires and will do what has to be done in the name of humanity. It will not be Russia who will do it for them, although the Russian working people were the first who have borken the chains. The people of the will do it for themselves in their own countries, against their own oppressors, in their own ways and in their own time!’
A 'Stalinist Beuracrate' to his Fascist Guards in Nazi Camp.