Thread: Antifa and Free Speech

Results 1 to 20 of 68

  1. #1
    Join Date Jul 2011
    Location North America
    Posts 94
    Rep Power 7

    Default Antifa and Free Speech

    Comrades, I want to start off with a quick disclaimer. I detest Fascists- let there be no question of that. And I believe that there are times when the best response to Fascism is direct, physical confrontation (we all have the right to defend ourselves).

    However, as leftists, we all believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the freedom to congregate. How do we reconcile these beliefs with the need to confront our Fascist enemies?

    To clarify, when should we be physically confronting Fascism, and when should be say "Hey, they're just some racists, and they have the freedom to be wrong."?

    Any ideas?
  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Flying Trotsky For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Oct 2010
    Posts 479
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    they have freedom of speech, we have freedom of smashing their megaphones over their heads paraphrasing introduction from "No Retreat"
  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Anarchist Skinhead For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Posts 1,472
    Rep Power 35

    Default

    Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them...We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. -Karl Popper
    Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full.-Leon Trotsky

    A revolution without dancing is not worth having.-Emma Goldman

    The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. -Che Guevara

    The wise thing to do is simply to skip the bosh and twaddle and vulgarity and untruth, and get the benefit out of the rest. -Teddy Roosevelt
  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Susurrus For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date May 2011
    Location The South, USA
    Posts 72
    Rep Power 9

    Default

    I don't believe in freedom of speech without freedom of action.
    I demand both.
    Say what you want, but don't think that you won't be held accountable or that you won't have to answer for it. Besides... We already know what fascists are organizing and what it means to us and our communities.

    In short: What Anarchist Skinhead said.
  8. #5
    Join Date May 2011
    Location South Ontario
    Posts 491
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    We should probably physically confront them when they get to large and popular or when they attack our comrades (extended self-defense) or if they attack people because of their race.

    If you meant non-violent legal confrontation then I think we should always disrupt their activities.

    But we have to be careful not to over do it or else we will look like "bad Commies attacking European patriots" and when the Nazis and Fascists look like victims, they might gain sympathy

    As for the right to be wrong:

    We should make sure to also prove they are wrong (though it is obvious, we still need empirical and scientific evidence; thats what seperates us from them). Then, we can add at the end of whatever media you choose to destroy the fascist arguments:

    "Hey, they have a right to be wrong"

    Preferably something more clever to get readers to dismiss the fascists as angry idiots
  9. #6
    blood thirsty tree hater Committed User
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Location netherlands
    Posts 3,150
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    Free speech for fascists should only serve to identify them and silence them.
    You are entering the vicinity of an area adjacent to a location. The kind of place where there might be a monster, or some kind of weird mirror...
  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to piet11111 For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date Nov 2009
    Location My college
    Posts 402
    Organisation
    Fan of the ISO//Kasama/SWP/IPICPPI
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    However, as leftists, we all believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the freedom to congregate.
    We do?
  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Imposter Marxist For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Location Michigan
    Posts 13
    Organisation
    Workers World Party
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Freedom of the press? What are you on about? You're all bonkers, mental, off your rockers, bat shit nuts.
  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razzle Dazzle For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Join Date Apr 2010
    Location Detroit, MI
    Posts 219
    Organisation
    Workers World Party
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    Yeah, Trotsky was all over those Bourgeois papers with his Red Guard divisions, seizing their presses and banning the distribution of counter-revolutionary literature. Interesting thing for what appears to be a Trotskyist to say. This is a conversation I've had over 9000 times. Fascists don't have the right to speech, press, congregation, or life. Evolve and come to the understanding that there's a monopoly on speech in the dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie and of the Proletariat and that the state apparatus is used to silence the opposite class from making any meaningful statement; this is clear, undeniable and unavoidable. It's only the worst liberalism to argue for the rights to speech, press, congregation, etc. for a demographic of rabid nationalists who want nothing more than to kill and imprison you and I for our affiliations. Never forget '33 when the Gestapo came for the KPD, and never forget the struggles in Yugoslavia and Greece, and the heroic victory of the Soviet Union over the fascist Axis, and remember your obligation to attack fascists with all ferocity if they show their faces or dare attempt to indoctrinate our children! The deaths of more than 40,000,000 innocent people are on all of our shoulders, their bold sacrifice in defiance to fascist invasion hanging on us like a shroud. To betray their sacrifice and to coddle neo-fascists is only the worst kind of treason.
    Tell your master that the Black Swordsman has come.
  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nuvem For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location Murdaland USA
    Posts 4,524
    Organisation
    Roving nihilist tribesmen
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    Counter-revolutionaries should not have the right to organize, demonstrate publicly, speak publicly, publish anything, or promote counter-revolution.


    "freedom of speech/press etc" is a totally bourgeois misconception of "rights".
    Put capitalism in a bag of rice.
  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to The Douche For This Useful Post:


  19. #11
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location In a cave
    Posts 617
    Organisation
    sympathizer: ICC and ICT
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    As I said in Antifa group.

    I don't think freedom of speech or related freedoms extend to reactionaries and fascists. To allow such to happen would be counter productive in a revolutionary situation. Also Capitalism will always find a way to attack us and we must always fight back. As long as we don't go after innocent workers' and comrades, we shouldn't have to take the "principled" stance and allow fascists their "rights".
  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Welshy For This Useful Post:


  21. #12
    Join Date Jul 2011
    Location North America
    Posts 94
    Rep Power 7

    Default

    Ok, maybe I should clarify things a bit here.

    I believe in fighting Fascist scum. I'm doing some research for a blog post on the subject, and I'm trying to get other people's justifications or explanations as to why confronting Fascists is not an infringement of free speech. I am not trying to defend Fascists, and I am not trying to deny that Trotsky and Trotskyists alike have been involved in attacks upon enemy publications.

    Look people, we're on the same side here. Let's all keep our cool, and have an honest, calm discussion about our various rationales.
    Last edited by Flying Trotsky; 23rd July 2011 at 20:25. Reason: Needed to further clarify, and the tone was probably a bit too harsh
  22. #13
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location In a cave
    Posts 617
    Organisation
    sympathizer: ICC and ICT
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Ok, maybe I should clarify things a bit here.

    This post was intended to be a discussion on what the proper parameters are for dealing the Fascist. I was wondering where we draw the line, what justifications we use for physical confrontation, and so on.

    As for Trotsky's actions, yeah, he and his followers did attack bourgeois publications. They were in the middle of a revolution. You want to make that point, go right ahead, but don't pointlessly antagonize me. We're all on the same side here.

    Let's all keep our heads, shall we?
    As soon as they actively start advocating violence against other races or start acting violent towards other races, I feel that's when we have to start acting. Also what ever actions we take, we need to keep in mind we have to prevent more of them from popping up.
  23. #14
    Join Date Dec 2010
    Location New York
    Posts 375
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    Counter-revolutionaries should not have the right to organize, demonstrate publicly, speak publicly, publish anything, or promote counter-revolution.


    "freedom of speech/press etc" is a totally bourgeois misconception of "rights".
    And who defines a "counter-revolutionary?" You? Me? A council? It's a slippery slope when we start banning speech.
    "If those in charge of our society — politicians, corporate executives, and owners of press and television — can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves."
    -Howard Zinn
  24. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Sensible Socialist For This Useful Post:


  25. #15
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Netherlands
    Posts 4,478
    Rep Power 106

    Default

    Some of these people here are unbelievable, avowedly stating that everyone who doesn't agree with 'our' politics has no right to express their disagreement. Utterly disgusting.
  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tim Cornelis For This Useful Post:


  27. #16
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location Murdaland USA
    Posts 4,524
    Organisation
    Roving nihilist tribesmen
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    Revolution is an inherently authoritarian process.

    I am open to hearing suggestions on how others think revolution can be defended while protecting the freedom of fascists to organize?
    Put capitalism in a bag of rice.
  28. #17
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Posts 1,472
    Rep Power 35

    Default

    Revolution is an inherently authoritarian process.

    I am open to hearing suggestions on how others think revolution can be defended while protecting the freedom of fascists to organize?
    They may organize, and the revolutionaries may organize to crush them.
    Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full.-Leon Trotsky

    A revolution without dancing is not worth having.-Emma Goldman

    The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. -Che Guevara

    The wise thing to do is simply to skip the bosh and twaddle and vulgarity and untruth, and get the benefit out of the rest. -Teddy Roosevelt
  29. The Following User Says Thank You to Susurrus For This Useful Post:


  30. #18
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location In a cave
    Posts 617
    Organisation
    sympathizer: ICC and ICT
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    They may organize, and the revolutionaries may organize to crush them.

    How is crushing them any different from denying them their "right" to free speech, assembly and etc?
  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Welshy For This Useful Post:


  32. #19
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Location US
    Posts 1,189
    Rep Power 24

    Default

    Fascist groups use the umbrella of freedom of speech to plan their activities. You let them talk about their shit unmolested, eventually they're going to quit talking and start acting. I can't, in all good conscience, let that happen. Sorry.
    My machine my machine,
    Please bring my machine.
  33. #20
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Posts 1,472
    Rep Power 35

    Default

    How is crushing them any different from denying them their "right" to free speech, assembly and etc?
    Well, as my first post shows, the right to free speech should be extend to those that believe in it as well, but should tolerance be given to those intending to crush tolerance(as the fascists do), tolerance itself is threatened, thus legitimizing attempts to save tolerance.
    Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full.-Leon Trotsky

    A revolution without dancing is not worth having.-Emma Goldman

    The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. -Che Guevara

    The wise thing to do is simply to skip the bosh and twaddle and vulgarity and untruth, and get the benefit out of the rest. -Teddy Roosevelt

Similar Threads

  1. Free speech in the USA
    By PRC-UTE in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 11th September 2006, 23:30
  2. War & Free Speech
    By emma_goldman in forum Research
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11th August 2006, 05:13
  3. Free Speech
    By UnionofSovietSocialistRepublics in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 1st October 2003, 06:04

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread