Typical of the lack of integrity of your politics.
RED DAVE
Results 21 to 26 of 26
It always feels so good to see that "[t]his message is hidden because RED DAVE is on your ignore list."
Typical of the lack of integrity of your politics.
RED DAVE
This!
Time for the revolutionary communist movement to do self criticism for not sounding the alarm strong enough when the UCPN-M first adopted this Trotskyite path, but instead hoping against hope.
Are what do you suggest? Lets face it, that very important gains have already been won from the struggle that have radically altered people's lives from the better. Yes it would be correct to say that leadership used a cover of being on the Communist road to gather the masses around their banner in order to fight an anti-feudal revolution, yet can we say that the masses have gained absolutely nothing? Have you no trust in the laboring people of Nepal that they will be able to re-form and once more hoist the red flag?
So now we see the new line: the reason why Bhattarai has sold out is THAT HE'S A TROT.Originally Posted by Ismail
You Maoists really have to go on the stage and do stand-up with this shit. This is the funniest thing since Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein.
RED DAVE
How about a little humility and self-criticism for an appetizer? Instead, you continue your political arrogance to try to cover up that you apoligized for Prachanda and Co. for years when it was obvious what kind of class collaboration the UCPN(M) was engaged in.Originally Posted by Jose Gracchus
Liberalism. The fact is that a Maoist is now the prime minister of a bourgeois government in which exploitation of the working class by the bourgeoisie is ongoing and exploitation of the peasantry by the landlords is ongoing.
(a) Even if this were true, what you are saying is that the Maoists, instead of trying raise consciousness, lied to the people about their true program. And (b) there is no anti-feudal program. First off, Nepal is not feudal. It's backward and rural, but the property forms have been show over and over again to participate in capitalist market relations. Secondly, there has been no shift in the countryside. There has been no significant land distribution: the landlords are still in power.
The same could be said by any liberal or social democrat.
Sure. Once they get rid of the corrupt ideology of Maoism.
Your party sold out, Comrade, right in front of the whole world. Now, are you going to scream "Revisionism" and get started doing the same thing over again? Or are you going to take a hard look at your ideology and see the fucking flaw in it: CLASS COLLABORATION.
RED DAVE