Thread: 400,000 Libyans demonstrating their support for Gaddafi

Results 141 to 153 of 153

  1. #141
    Join Date Feb 2011
    Posts 3,140
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Ok this is a serious question to all the haters: If a video of 100000s of people holding pics of gaddaffi and green flags is not adequate, what would it take to prove to you that the jamahiriya has popular support ?
    An election would be nice. But Uncle Muammar wasn't really very fond of them, was he?
  2. #142
    Join Date Nov 2008
    Location Norfolk, England
    Posts 3,128
    Organisation
    Peoples' Front of Judea (Marxist-Leninist)
    Rep Power 73

    Default

    An election would be nice. But Uncle Muammar wasn't really very fond of them, was he?
    Funny you should say that; he offered the rebels internationally moniterd elections but they refused.
    COMMUNISM !

    Formerly zenga zenga !
  3. #143
    Join Date Feb 2011
    Posts 3,140
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Funny you should say that; he offered the rebels internationally moniterd elections but they refused.
    So they're both sucky, yes, we've been saying that for some time.
  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tim Finnegan For This Useful Post:


  5. #144
    Join Date Mar 2011
    Posts 1,035
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Ok this is a serious question to all the haters: If a video of 100000s of people holding pics of gaddaffi and green flags is not adequate, what would it take to prove to you that the jamahiriya has popular support ?
    There was not hundreds of thousands on the video. I've seen crowds and I know how easy it is to overestimate their sizes by orders of magnitude.

    Also seriously, Raheem - the "anti-establishment right" is a cute euphemism for fascists.
  6. The Following User Says Thank You to agnixie For This Useful Post:


  7. #145
    Join Date Dec 2007
    Location USA
    Posts 6,302
    Organisation
    Dem Soc
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Also seriously, Raheem - the "anti-establishment right" is a cute euphemism for fascists.
    The anti-establishment rightists like Paul Craig Roberts and Alex Jones, NWO types are libertarians that decry fascism. Of course their sense of history concerning the US is still grounded in exceptionalism but they are always staunch civil libertarians. They're not fascists.

    Fascists, in any sense of the word, would be the establishment rightists like Glen Beck, right wing commerical radio, Sean Hannity, the religious right.

    I mean how hard is this for you to understand? I thought it was pretty blatant since most of their shows revolve around neo-fascist takeover conspiracies by multi-national corporations and their puppets in Government.

    How on Earth is that the same from establishment rightists that wish to curb civil liberties in the name of fighting terror and promote neo-liberalism at home and abroad?

    I would soon find some sort of common ground about current events with an NWO Alex Jones guy before it devolved into Bilderberg conspiracy stuff. They know there is a ruling class, they know there is deep politics and it goes deeper than the propaganda on television, they know the CIA conducts democracy destablizing missions. They're just wrapped up in this idea about it all being fostered by seedy underground networks when in reality it's just the capitalist social order at work, nothing more.

    How are you going to compare the anti-establishment right who admits that 9/11 was blowback vs. an establishment GOP kool aid drinking pundit who think terrorists hates us because of our freedom and that the wealth will all trickle down if we give out more corporate welfare?

    RT News is a pro-Russian new organization that serves the Russian state, but in this emerging multi-polar world, the Russians have decided to combat the US media machine, and in this inter-capitalist fighting we get some good news about US imperial ambitions.

    Seriously, with comments about Gaddafi being a fascist arab supremicist, how you can tell if a crowd is 100ks or not and that the anti-establisment right featured on RT New are "fascists", I find it hard to take you seriously.
  8. The Following User Says Thank You to RadioRaheem84 For This Useful Post:


  9. #146
    Join Date Nov 2012
    Posts 28
    Organisation
    Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I'm going to cop a lot of shit for what I'm about to say but I'll say it anyway. Libyans have genuine material reasons for supporting the Gaddafi regime in this conflict.
    Why would you 'Cop shit' for it?
    Gaddafi was progressive.
  10. The Following User Says Thank You to marxleninstalinmao For This Useful Post:


  11. #147
    Join Date Nov 2012
    Posts 28
    Organisation
    Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Seeing as you're of the opinion that anyone who actually does choose to turn their guns on Gaddafi is a "rebel scumbag", I'm honestly not sure what point you think that you're making, here.
    Everyone who turned their guns on Gadaffi WAS a rebel scumbag- Gadaffi was a progressive and an anti-imperialist hero
  12. The Following User Says Thank You to marxleninstalinmao For This Useful Post:


  13. #148
    Join Date Jun 2008
    Location Stalingrad
    Posts 1,424
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    Why would you 'Cop shit' for it?
    Gaddafi was progressive.
    You haven't been here long enough. A lot of Libyan rebel supporters here.
    "Machinery in itself is a victory of man over the forces of nature, but in the hands of capital it makes man the slave of those forces" - Uncle Karl
  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sir Comradical For This Useful Post:


  15. #149
    Let the dead bury the dead. Committed User
    Forum Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2008
    Location Terra Incognita
    Posts 5,073
    Organisation
    Bolshevik Penpals Society
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    Everyone who turned their guns on Gadaffi WAS a rebel scumbag- Gadaffi was a progressive and an anti-imperialist hero
    A hero ally in the U.S War Against Terror more like. And hero ally of the EU in building fäustung europa and keeping immigrants out. These are facts. But if you consider that to be progressive...
    "I want to say sweet, silly things." - V.I Lenin
  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Crux For This Useful Post:


  17. #150
    Join Date Jan 2012
    Posts 1,567
    Rep Power 27

    Default

    The Gaddafi family stole billions from Libya via its petroleum revenues. In the end Gaddafi suffered a fate as ignominious as that suffered by Mussolini. Gaddafi was about as "progressive" as Mussolini.
  18. The Following User Says Thank You to GoddessCleoLover For This Useful Post:


  19. #151
    Join Date Oct 2004
    Location Halifax, NS
    Posts 3,395
    Organisation
    Sounds authoritarian . . .
    Rep Power 71

    Default

    Maybe it came up earlier in the thread, but I missed some pages in the middle, so . . . was the video of the rally at the start of this thread "pro-Gaddafi", "anti-NATO", or some ambiguous mix of both? I mean, a person can certainly be one without being the other, or, for example, conditionally "pro-Gaddafi" in the context of NATO aggression, or . . . well, I think there is a lot of room for nuance here that is being overlooked.
    I also think it's really dangerous to homogenize resistance to the Gaddafi regime - certainly, there are neo-liberal douchebags involved, but, by the same token, it is by no means a project of exclusively neo-liberal douchebags, nor does the end of the Gaddafi regime necessarily mean the deepening integration of Libya into the world capitalist market.
    Basically, this shit is hella complicated.
    The life we have conferred upon these objects confronts us as something hostile and alien.

    Formerly Virgin Molotov Cocktail (11/10/2004 - 21/08/2013)
  20. #152
    Join Date Dec 2010
    Location Kentucky, United States
    Posts 3,305
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Massive necro
  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ostrinski For This Useful Post:


  22. #153
    Join Date Sep 2012
    Posts 1,168
    Rep Power 34

    Default

    Considering the recent revolts and armed conflict between the tribes and the government I'd say that it's worthy of being bumped

Similar Threads

  1. If you do not support Gaddafi, you are not a Marxist
    By CesareBorgia in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 208
    Last Post: 23rd April 2011, 14:37
  2. Western Propaganda fails: most Libyans still back Muammar Gaddafi
    By daleckian in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 26th March 2011, 09:34
  3. demonstrating resistance
    By Organic Revolution in forum Practice
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 9th July 2005, 06:21
  4. Demonstrating is good for your health!
    By Conghaileach in forum Practice
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd January 2003, 13:15

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts