Results 41 to 55 of 55
IT IS A LEFTIST FORUM. [/SIZE]
The reason we have the opposing ideaology section is to debate different leftist ideaologies, from anarchy to stalinism, not to put up with racism, discrimination and the slander dished out buy you anti-leftists. Go join some Hitlerite faction and leave us leftists to plot your demise.. :L[/SIZE]
Seriously though, if you are SO against equality, why did you join us? i mean if you're neutral then by all means let us teach you, but if you have come here to blatently dismiss out views and have such an ignorant, narrow-minded opinion of everything that is leftist then just get lost..[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Ben resizing the fonts this big isnt allowed in serious forums. Chitchat is another story. Please note this for the future.
Last edited by Le Libérer; 30th June 2011 at 03:51. Reason: Oversized fonts.
To put it mildly!
Psycho answered your question very well, I'd also add that Fascists have no interest in constructive debate, the only reason they would be here is to troll and flamebait. Fascism is the polar opposite of Socialism, we have nothing in common and no shared interest whatsoever. Moreover not only is Fascism implicitly reactionary, but it very often manifests in racism, sexism, homophobia etc, all of which are bannable offenses here.
In the end, the ballot must decide, not bullets Jonas Savimbi
Democracy is when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers Aristotle
ben barton, I hope you're joking...........
FKA Comrade Ducky
Question everything, answer to no one.
MAKE TOTAL DESTROY, not war.
"This duck is a nuclear duck and it's time the world started calling a duck a duck."-Benjamin Netanyahu
"I reject your reality and substitute my own."- Adam Savage
Man I miss Reefer already![]()
I... don't exactly understand why he was banned.
FKA Comrade Ducky
Question everything, answer to no one.
MAKE TOTAL DESTROY, not war.
"This duck is a nuclear duck and it's time the world started calling a duck a duck."-Benjamin Netanyahu
"I reject your reality and substitute my own."- Adam Savage
Because leftists love to espouse free-speech but unless they're Anarchists, they might be hesitant to allow it.
Wa Salaam Alaikum and Choni Bashi
Allow me to introduce myself, Zrian Kobani
A smart-ass with no time for bankers or Nazis
Went to fuck with Daesh but even al-Baghdadi couldn't stop me
Others are sloppy, I speak with finesse, all I need is my vocab to prove I'm the best
G-D is coming soon so I've no time for rest and if you're down with Erdogan I'll put the tefang to your chest
Someone who has seen plenty of trolls can say that this person was almost definitely trolling. Like an admin, for example. The way he always replied to "you're fascist" allegations ("aww, did I hurt you? Sorry![]()
) reeks of trolling.
Also, Victor, not all leftists support free speech.
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]I'm going to eat ribs-nyo![/FONT][FONT=Trebuchet MS]
[/FONT][FONT=Trebuchet MS]I'm going to eat ribs-nyo![/FONT]
follow me on twitter
https://twitter.com/thug_lessons
Because we don't talk with fascists. We beat them up ^^
"Men choose as their prophets those who tell them that their hopes are true." -Lord Dunsany
"As a Marxist, as a Communist and as a free human being, I oppose any Czar, Dear Leader, Premier, Emperor, Kaiser, Dictator, etc, etc. So I tell you; to hell with your Stalins, Hitlers, Maos, and Francos. I oppose any tyrant not because he kills a million people, but because he is a tyrant. I say no to tyranny and oppression, and anyone who disagrees does not belong here." - Iron Felix
The OI section is for, "right-wingers, capitalists, preachers, primitivists, and other restricted members," not any leftists, regardless of tendency.
[FONT=Verdana]The Anarchists never have claimed that liberty will bring perfection; they simply say that its results are vastly preferable to those that follow authority. -Benjamin Tucker[/FONT]
Well, (A) we don't know that Reefer's a fascist, and (B) we don't know that Reefer's a troll.
Reefer started two threads. The first was the standard introductory thread, and the second was a thread asking about something that, frankly, was the first thing I myself noticed about the site's rules (hence why I chose this user name). If he was a troll or a spammer, he certainly lacked commitment to either occupation.
The worst dirt that we have on Reefer is that some of his responses came off as sarcastic, but that's only because we (i.e. most of you) put him on the defensive almost immediately. Guilt by accusation, in essence - unless I'm missing something. If I'm not, though, then the ban (in my oh-so-precious opinion) is utterly ridiculous.
Knowing that there's nothing I can do about it, though, I'll shut up right...now.
Not sure where to ask this, but does this post mean that Reefer and FriendlyGiantloveAndCare were the same person?
He was a troll, yo.
Thread closed.
By having no family … I inherited the family of humanity.
By having no possessions … I have possessed all.
By rejecting the love of one … I received the love of all.
By surrendering my life to the revolution … I found eternal life.
“Revolutionary Suicide”
-Huey P. Newton
We do have one, Its called the trash bin.
No. It means they came here at the same time to troll.
By having no family … I inherited the family of humanity.
By having no possessions … I have possessed all.
By rejecting the love of one … I received the love of all.
By surrendering my life to the revolution … I found eternal life.
“Revolutionary Suicide”
-Huey P. Newton