Thread: Anti-Fascism as a front:

Results 1 to 20 of 24

  1. #1
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default Anti-Fascism as a front:

    "It is easier to be a critic than a creator." This statement was never truer than when applied to anti-fascism. From what I have observed, the nature of anti-fascism is a timid form of Communism, a Communism-lite. It is a method of attempting, by deceit, to trick people into following Communist rhetoric they would otherwise find unpalatable. It is easy to get people to subscribe to simplistic messages such as "anti-racism" or "pro-democracy", yet dig a little deeper into most organizations such as UAF, and you begin to see the real agenda.

    The fact of the matter is, the reason Communism (and I use this as a broad term to describe the wider left, as I will deal with in depth later) has made no inroads in the past 20 to 30 years is because people do not wish to sign up to the more 'extreme' elements of the doctrine. People don't want religion stamped out, they don't want enforced atheism. Just look at the rapid growth of religion in ‘communist’ China. They don't want the removal of private property, or imposed uniformity. And the fact of the matter is, Communists know this. Therefore they present: Anti-Fascism! Get rid of those big mean fascists over there, who could argue with such a prospect? People don't notice the sting in the tail.

    And then of course there's a matter of, who exactly are these anti-fascists? The answer is simple really: just about anyone. Liberals, Anarchists, Communists, Socialists. Some may see that as a plus, a broad church movement - but really it belies the fact that each movement listed individually failed on its own merits. That no consensus can be reached; that anti-fascism is an ideology that stands for both everything and nothing. None of these movements can win on their own platform. And if they continue to follow this route of burying their policies, they never will.
  2. #2
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    The fact of the matter is, the reason Communism (and I use this as a broad term to describe the wider left, as I will deal with in depth later) has made no inroads in the past 20 to 30 years is because people do not wish to sign up to the more 'extreme' elements of the doctrine. People don't want religion stamped out, they don't want enforced atheism. Just look at the rapid growth of religion in ‘communist’ China. They don't want the removal of private property, or imposed uniformity. And the fact of the matter is, Communists know this. Therefore they present: Anti-Fascism! Get rid of those big mean fascists over there, who could argue with such a prospect? People don't notice the sting in the tail.
    Communists don't propose any of these thing except the bit about private property and it doesn't mean what you probably think it means.
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  3. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to #FF0000 For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date Jun 2009
    Location Newfoundland, Canada
    Posts 2,182
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Incoming restrictionnnnnn peww pewwwwww
  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Die Rote Fahne For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Well, I see apart from the false threat of a ban and an irrelevant observation no-one had a rebuttal to this.
  7. #5
    Join Date Mar 2010
    Posts 1,288
    Organisation
    Kommunistisk Parti
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    You come on a communist forum and criticise anti-fascists for being communists, and expect a rebuttal? Do you regularly consume crystal meth?
  8. #6
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    If you took the time to read my post, I'm criticising anti-fascist movements for failing to stand on their own platform and attempting to use the umbrella term "anti-fascism" to decieve people into believing they're something else.
  9. #7
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Also, I think you'll find it's mostly Communists that are the crystal meth takers, it is a rather permissive ideology after all
  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Transcendence For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    "It is easier to be a critic than a creator."
    Depends on what you're critiquing and what you're creating doesn't it?

    This statement was never truer than when applied to anti-fascism. From what I have observed, the nature of anti-fascism is a timid form of Communism, a Communism-lite.
    You've observed anti-fascism being an economic system? I'm impressed as all I've ever observed in anti-fascism is, well, anti-fascism...

    It is a method of attempting, by deceit, to trick people into following Communist rhetoric they would otherwise find unpalatable. It is easy to get people to subscribe to simplistic messages such as "anti-racism" or "pro-democracy", yet dig a little deeper into most organizations such as UAF, and you begin to see the real agenda.
    Oh do tell..

    The fact of the matter is, the reason Communism (and I use this as a broad term to describe the wider left, as I will deal with in depth later) has made no inroads in the past 20 to 30 years is because people do not wish to sign up to the more 'extreme' elements of the doctrine. People don't want religion stamped out, they don't want enforced atheism.
    No communist wants to enforce atheism, or stamp out religion. Communists believe with reason that religion will gradually disappear with the change in the mode of economic production.

    Just look at the rapid growth of religion in ‘communist’ China. They don't want the removal of private property, or imposed uniformity. And the fact of the matter is, Communists know this. Therefore they present: Anti-Fascism! Get rid of those big mean fascists over there, who could argue with such a prospect? People don't notice the sting in the tail.
    1. China isn't communist.
    2. Communists don't want "the removal of private property," they want working class possession of the means of production.
    3. Communists oppose fascism for the same reason most people do, because it's reactionary and oppressive.

    And then of course there's a matter of, who exactly are these anti-fascists? The answer is simple really: just about anyone. Liberals, Anarchists, Communists, Socialists. Some may see that as a plus, a broad church movement - but really it belies the fact that each movement listed individually failed on its own merits.
    No... it belies the fact that lots of people share the same point of view.

    That no consensus can be reached; that anti-fascism is an ideology that stands for both everything and nothing. None of these movements can win on their own platform. And if they continue to follow this route of burying their policies, they never will.
    Wow. This shit is deep man. You must have like, really thought about this stuff for like, a while and shit.

    I mean anti-fascists are actually communists in disguise??? So THAT'S why they wear those masks and shit - so we can't see their red faces! Crazy commies... hiding everywhere.

    I'm gonna go look under my porch really quick, I thought I heard some anti-fascist slogans being yelled out front.

    If I don't come back, ... , they got me.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Decolonize The Left For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 180
    Organisation
    YPG
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    also, i think you'll find it's mostly communists that are the crystal meth takers, it is a rather permissive ideology after all
    lololololololololololololol
    Wa Salaam Alaikum and Choni Bashi
    Allow me to introduce myself, Zrian Kobani
    A smart-ass with no time for bankers or Nazis
    Went to fuck with Daesh but even al-Baghdadi couldn't stop me
    Others are sloppy, I speak with finesse, all I need is my vocab to prove I'm the best
    G-D is coming soon so I've no time for rest and if you're down with Erdogan I'll put the tefang to your chest
  14. #10
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Super Jail
    Posts 343
    Organisation
    Voodoo Party
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Also, I think you'll find it's mostly Communists that are the crystal meth takers, it is a rather permissive ideology after all
    Meth is reactionary, coke is revolutionary, duh.
  15. #11
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    Meth is reactionary, coke is revolutionary, duh.
    Coke is expensive and hence reactionary.

    Whiskey is revolutionary.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  16. #12
    Join Date Oct 2009
    Location Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts 4,407
    Organisation
    none...yet
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    Isn't it really interesting that OP's only posts, regardless of ramblings about Portugal and Spain being sparsely populated, consist of:

    1) denouncing black nationalism

    So your argument in essence boils down to black nationalism is "good" because it is defensive, when in actual fact the only real reason it is defensive is because they are a minority - but they won't be forever as white numbers decline. As with all racialist movements, they will radicalise proportionally to their power. There are no "good racists" and "bad racists."
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...&postcount=337

    2) and denouncing anti-fascism, in a particularly interesting way: namely, OP argued that every ideological position which can be included in the overall anti-fascist front failed, including liberalism, which implies a certain political outlook on behalf of OP: either a variant of conservativism, or outright fascism

    Boys and girls, I smell a dirty rotten fash.
    FKA LinksRadikal
    “The possibility of securing for every member of society, by means of socialized production, an existence not only fully sufficient materially, and becoming day by day more full, but an existence guaranteeing to all the free development and exercise of their physical and mental faculties – this possibility is now for the first time here, but it is here.” Friedrich Engels

    "The proletariat is its struggle; and its struggles have to this day not led it beyond class society, but deeper into it." Friends of the Classless Society

    "Your life is survived by your deeds" - Steve von Till
  17. #13
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location St Andrews / Edinburgh
    Posts 874
    Organisation
    CWI
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    The Anti-Fascist idea seems to basically be a modern extension of the idea of a Popular Front against Fascism that emerged way back. This idea insinuates that it is more important to deal with the greater evil (Fascism) than the lesser evil (Liberal Capitalism) and differences should be put aside whilst this problem is dealt with. Thats the thinking behind the idea. Your also must understand that the left has a chronic problem of labelling anything racist as Fascist. Now, anti-racism (for the past century atleast) has been perhaps the second most important facet of leftist ideologies (second only to opposition to the excesses of capitalism) therefore opposition to racist groups is seen as extremely important. Any racist movement, no matter how weak, must be throttled in its cradle lest it spread into something as horrific as the regimes we saw in the mid 20th century.

    Thats the thinking behind it. Anti-Fascism isn't really some strange and shadowy movement with the aim of converting the unwilling to socialism - if contact with leftist ideas does indeed make people consider them then this is merely a secondary positive.

    The single idea of socialism that you must understand is the simple belief that the workers should control the means of production. No man should be able to exploit another. That is what socialism means and I do believe this is something people would be able to handle. Our real problem isn't that our ideas are unacceptable, it is that our ideas are falsly presented by our opponents who want to ensure that they appear unacceptable.
  18. #14
    Join Date Jun 2009
    Location Newfoundland, Canada
    Posts 2,182
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    "It is easier to be a critic than a creator." This statement was never truer than when applied to anti-fascism. From what I have observed, the nature of anti-fascism is a timid form of Communism, a Communism-lite. It is a method of attempting, by deceit, to trick people into following Communist rhetoric they would otherwise find unpalatable. It is easy to get people to subscribe to simplistic messages such as "anti-racism" or "pro-democracy", yet dig a little deeper into most organizations such as UAF, and you begin to see the real agenda.
    Anti-fascism has no set socioeconomic theories. It's merely a movement that opposes fascism. It just so happens that communists, anarchists, etc. are active anti-fascists.

    If they find communist rhetoric palatable under the guise of anti-fascism, then they find it palatable altogether.

    Real Agenda is what now? NWO?

    The fact of the matter is, the reason Communism (and I use this as a broad term to describe the wider left, as I will deal with in depth later) has made no inroads in the past 20 to 30 years is because people do not wish to sign up to the more 'extreme' elements of the doctrine. People don't want religion stamped out, they don't want enforced atheism. Just look at the rapid growth of religion in ‘communist’ China. They don't want the removal of private property, or imposed uniformity. And the fact of the matter is, Communists know this. Therefore they present: Anti-Fascism! Get rid of those big mean fascists over there, who could argue with such a prospect? People don't notice the sting in the tail.
    Strawman.

    And then of course there's a matter of, who exactly are these anti-fascists? The answer is simple really: just about anyone. Liberals, Anarchists, Communists, Socialists. Some may see that as a plus, a broad church movement - but really it belies the fact that each movement listed individually failed on its own merits. That no consensus can be reached; that anti-fascism is an ideology that stands for both everything and nothing. None of these movements can win on their own platform. And if they continue to follow this route of burying their policies, they never will.
    Lolwut
  19. #15
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Super Jail
    Posts 343
    Organisation
    Voodoo Party
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Coke is expensive and hence reactionary.
    Maybe if you're in the first-world yeah.
  20. #16
    Join Date Mar 2011
    Posts 1,035
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Dudes a butthurt fascist.
  21. #17
    Join Date Jun 2011
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Well, seeing as this thread has gotten rather lively I'll just deal with the more pressing points in amongst all the junkie banter.

    "1. China isn't communist.
    2. Communists don't want "the removal of private property," they want working class possession of the means of production.
    3. Communists oppose fascism for the same reason most people do, because it's reactionary and oppressive.
    I'm aware this "China isn't Communist" argument would come up, hence why I highlighted the word. I certainly don't consider it in any sense a true Communist state, but I do find it interesting that Communists wish to distance themselves from all existing or previously existing Communist states. North Korea isn't Communist, Soviet Russia wasn't Communist, Vietnam wasn't Communist.. etc. It may well be the case that none of these states managed to reach whatever arbitrary distinction signifies "true" communism, but perhaps the problem is with the ideology rather than circumstance?

    Isn't it really interesting that OP's only posts, regardless of ramblings about Portugal and Spain being sparsely populated, consist of:

    1) denouncing black nationalism

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Transcendence
    So your argument in essence boils down to black nationalism is "good" because it is defensive, when in actual fact the only real reason it is defensive is because they are a minority - but they won't be forever as white numbers decline. As with all racialist movements, they will radicalise proportionally to their power. There are no "good racists" and "bad racists."

    2) and denouncing anti-fascism, in a particularly interesting way: namely, OP argued that every ideological position which can be included in the overall anti-fascist front failed, including liberalism, which implies a certain political outlook on behalf of OP: either a variant of conservativism, or outright fascism

    Boys and girls, I smell a dirty rotten fash."
    Top quality work in detecting opposition on the opposing forums, Sherlock Stalin.

    No communist wants to enforce atheism, or stamp out religion. Communists believe with reason that religion will gradually disappear with the change in the mode of economic production.
    Hmm.. Historically, I'm sure you'll concede that the "gradual disappearance of religion" hasn't been quite so 'gradual' in communist states. Tends to be a lot more immediate, in the sense of the churches suddenly being torn down or blown up ;p

    Real Agenda is what now? NWO?
    Yup. You Illumanti, and the reptiles. Oh and Xenu. It's all part of your secret plan.
  22. #18
    Join Date Oct 2009
    Location Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts 4,407
    Organisation
    none...yet
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    Top quality work in detecting opposition on the opposing forums, Sherlock Stalin.
    Jeez, poor quality work in detecting one simple fact about this forum: we don't like fash. In fact, they are banned on sight.
    But wow, I've never been called a name which has something to do with old Joseph, sweet

    Now, why don't you tell us about your political views (other than anti-communism)?
    FKA LinksRadikal
    “The possibility of securing for every member of society, by means of socialized production, an existence not only fully sufficient materially, and becoming day by day more full, but an existence guaranteeing to all the free development and exercise of their physical and mental faculties – this possibility is now for the first time here, but it is here.” Friedrich Engels

    "The proletariat is its struggle; and its struggles have to this day not led it beyond class society, but deeper into it." Friends of the Classless Society

    "Your life is survived by your deeds" - Steve von Till
  23. #19
    Join Date Jun 2009
    Location Newfoundland, Canada
    Posts 2,182
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Well, seeing as this thread has gotten rather lively I'll just deal with the more pressing points in amongst all the junkie banter.
    LOL ok...

    I'm aware this "China isn't Communist" argument would come up, hence why I highlighted the word. I certainly don't consider it in any sense a true Communist state, but I do find it interesting that Communists wish to distance themselves from all existing or previously existing Communist states. North Korea isn't Communist, Soviet Russia wasn't Communist, Vietnam wasn't Communist.. etc. It may well be the case that none of these states managed to reach whatever arbitrary distinction signifies "true" communism, but perhaps the problem is with the ideology rather than circumstance?
    Do tell us the exact flaws in our theory and Ideology that prevented these nations from achieving socialism/communism? I mean, it couldn't be the lack of following the theory...certainly not...

    Top quality work in detecting opposition on the opposing forums, Sherlock Stalin.
    Lol. Usually when someone isn't anti-fascist, it's because they are either a fascist or a sympathizer of fascism.

    Hmm.. Historically, I'm sure you'll concede that the "gradual disappearance of religion" hasn't been quite so 'gradual' in communist states. Tends to be a lot more immediate, in the sense of the churches suddenly being torn down or blown up ;p
    You'll be pleased to know that Stalin was more lenient toward churches than Lenin.

    Yup. You Illumanti, and the reptiles. Oh and Xenu. It's all part of your secret plan.
    So you'd gladly explain the wider anti-fascist agenda?
  24. #20
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    Well, seeing as this thread has gotten rather lively I'll just deal with the more pressing points in amongst all the junkie banter.
    Troll confused with trolling?

    I'm aware this "China isn't Communist" argument would come up, hence why I highlighted the word. I certainly don't consider it in any sense a true Communist state, but I do find it interesting that Communists wish to distance themselves from all existing or previously existing Communist states. North Korea isn't Communist, Soviet Russia wasn't Communist, Vietnam wasn't Communist.. etc. It may well be the case that none of these states managed to reach whatever arbitrary distinction signifies "true" communism, but perhaps the problem is with the ideology rather than circumstance?
    Odd that you yourself say that you don't consider China a "true communist state" yet then you say that communists often try and do what you just did... so what are you trying to say?

    Hmm.. Historically, I'm sure you'll concede that the "gradual disappearance of religion" hasn't been quite so 'gradual' in communist states. Tends to be a lot more immediate, in the sense of the churches suddenly being torn down or blown up ;p
    This may have been true in isolated cases, much like right-wingers blowing up abortion clinics and advocating the murder of doctors who perform abortions.

    All in all, your 'points' are nothing other than tangentially related ideas which you seem to think gives you some sort of true point of view on anti-fascism.

    You are, of course, a fucking moron. Communists aren't trying to infiltrate or co-opt anti-fascism, rather, anti-fascism has a long history of being leftist. The fact that you came onto a leftist forum and your first post is about anti-fascism simply tells all of us that you're a fascist troll and a very poor one at that. We've seen far better in our time.

    But points for trying.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx

Similar Threads

  1. anti-fascism ?? or just anti-overtly-racist-thugism?
    By scarletghoul in forum Action & Anti-Fascism
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2nd August 2010, 10:19
  2. Another anti-imperialist front is coming from Caracas
    By el_chavista in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 14th December 2009, 07:03
  3. [anarkismo.net] Against Fascism and Anti-Fascism
    By RSS News in forum Newswire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th April 2009, 18:00
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26th April 2009, 08:00
  5. Anti-fascism is the new fascism?
    By FriedFrog in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 8th March 2008, 10:38

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread