Thread: Why is there such dislike for Marxist- Leninists

Results 41 to 60 of 389

  1. #41
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Posts 4,297
    Rep Power 69

    Default

    To be fair, MLs outside the U.S. might just be the tired adherents of gerontocratic reenactment societies and labor bureaucracies, and the attendant mythologies that go along with it. In the U.S., and most of the Anglosphere, "official Communism" has never been anything but a small sect, and there's no intelligible motivations aside from ignorance and an attraction for radical chic and contrarianism to justify joining a ML group here.

    All the MLs I've met are students who have a need to be perceived as "doing" something. Much effort is expended for what are essentially purposeless, unsuccessful acts of self-indulgent self-righteousness. The entire organized left in the U.S. tends to be middle class in content, with a few exceptions here and there. I don't remember the last time one made a meaningful or insightful contribution to theory and understanding, in fact, their commitment to a dead movement of apologia for crimes against the working class leads them to commit much of their time to merely apologizing for whatever group of substitutionist statists they look up to today. I mean of what value possibly could the ML fixation in the West with defending Zimbabwe and Mugabe in their papers actually have? There's this fixation with welfarism and moralism, connected to a self-righteousness for having "supported" the right "side" from a computer ten thousand miles away.

    I find all of that hard to understand from the point of view of a balanced and rational person.

    almost every point in this post could be just as easily be made into an attack on Anarchists in the west. change a few words and names. bada bing bada boom you are now critiquing anarkiddies.
    FKA Vacant

    "snook up behind him and took his koran, he said sumthin about burnin the koran. i was like DUDE YOU HAVE NO KORAN and ran off." - Jacob Isom, Amarillo Resident.

  2. #42
    Join Date May 2010
    Location FL, USA
    Posts 2,129
    Organisation
    None right now
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    That's actually true, I mean I did say the "entire organized left." I don't think activism and organizing is totally pointless but I kind of agree with the leftcoms that if this doesn't emerge organically out of class struggles you will always end up with dysfunction, whether its mostly middle class kids calling themselves "anarchists", "MLs", or "Trotskyists".

    It may be just down to personal experience in activism locally, which left a very bad taste in my mouth.
  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jose Gracchus For This Useful Post:


  4. #43
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 6,289
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    lol "their anti-theoretical and anti-intellectual attitudes and overall lack of knowledge" damn too bad us proletarians dont have as much time to read as you do cause we working. I do try though

    love to know how the correct pro-theoretical and pro-intellectual attitude and overall great amount of knowledge is doing with that whole revolution thing. if only you could have exposed _all_ the great revolutionaries of history with your superior knowledge. the masses would be greatful.
    you are such a pinhead. the most sophisticated communists ive met didnt go to college. there is a strong tradition in the revolutionary working class for self education, no need to do the stupid anti intellectual posturing, stalin jr.
    Formerly dada

    [URL="https://gemeinwesen.wordpress.com/"species being[/URL] - A magazine of communist polemic
  5. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to black magick hustla For This Useful Post:


  6. #44
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    you are such a pinhead. the most sophisticated communists ive met didnt go to college. there is a strong tradition in the revolutionary working class for self education, no need to do the stupid anti intellectual posturing, stalin jr.
    Where was the anti-intellectual posturing?

    Self criticism....When I leave the neurosis of my boss often I let out aggression on the internet or read novels or plays or poetry rather than political theory because I feel I get enough political theory from the horrid reality confronting me. The fact is though that the fact that Maoists are not the most amazing well read tendency on this forum has to do with maybe the fact that most of us didnt go to university? Just maybe?
  7. #45
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 6,289
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    You have fundamental lack of understanding of why working class people like Spawn of Stalin, not to mention millions other proles and poor peasants globally turn to "Stalinism" and "Maoism", when you comprehend that than you might have a chance of actually understanding us.
    i think the reason why spawn of stalin became a stalinist bonehead is different than "the millions of proles and poor peasants" that tailed official communism. spawn of stalin is in canada, where official communism are sects. he had to do a conscious effort to like stalin and think that everything against stalin is a bourgeois lie. in countries where there is real official communism, official communism is just a faction of the boss class, and the dominant ideas are always the ones of the boss class. furthermore, western stalinists have absorbed more theory and abstractions in order to justify their dumb beliefs or whatever, while in the real world proles and peasants who are "stalinists" are more similar to average people who are democrats or republicans.
    Formerly dada

    [URL="https://gemeinwesen.wordpress.com/"species being[/URL] - A magazine of communist polemic
  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to black magick hustla For This Useful Post:


  9. #46
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 6,289
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    Where was the anti-intellectual posturing?

    Self criticism....When I leave the neurosis of my boss often I let out aggression on the internet or read novels or plays or poetry rather than political theory because I feel I get enough political theory from the horrid reality confronting me. The fact is though that the fact that Maoists are not the most amazing well read tendency on this forum has to do with maybe the fact that most of us didnt go to university? Just maybe?
    i bet that there are more college maoists in the west than college trotskyists, this is entirely anecdotal, but at least the trotskyists had some sort of industrial prescence, maoists had nil
    Formerly dada

    [URL="https://gemeinwesen.wordpress.com/"species being[/URL] - A magazine of communist polemic
  10. The Following User Says Thank You to black magick hustla For This Useful Post:


  11. #47
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 6,289
    Rep Power 116

    Default

    Where was the anti-intellectual posturing?

    Self criticism....When I leave the neurosis of my boss often I let out aggression on the internet or read novels or plays or poetry rather than political theory because I feel I get enough political theory from the horrid reality confronting me. The fact is though that the fact that Maoists are not the most amazing well read tendency on this forum has to do with maybe the fact that most of us didnt go to university? Just maybe?
    i dont read any political theory either, i mostly read poetry and science shit. but to say that maoists are unsophisticated because they didnt go to "college" is just a lie, considering that some of the main maoist cadre and the nuclei of what became larger maoist parties were college educated. (the first generation of naxalites)
    Formerly dada

    [URL="https://gemeinwesen.wordpress.com/"species being[/URL] - A magazine of communist polemic
  12. #48
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    i dont read any political theory either, i mostly read poetry and science shit. but to say that maoists are unsophisticated because they didnt go to "college" is just a lie, considering that some of the main maoist cadre and the nuclei of what became larger maoist parties were college educated. (the first generation of naxalites)
    The first generation leadership of Naxalites, yes, but not the vast majority of Naxalites. And yes a lot of the leaderships by force of circumstance are college educated, but that is not the base of the movement. In the newly formed Maoist group I belong two only two people out of ten have been to university and both are immigrants with very crap jobs. Education offers people a lot, its not something that I dismiss, I wish I had more of it.
  13. #49
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    i bet that there are more college maoists in the west than college trotskyists, this is entirely anecdotal, but at least the trotskyists had some sort of industrial prescence, maoists had nil
    Are there though?

    Most Maoists in the west are third world immigrants.
  14. #50
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location Hater of the Year Awards
    Posts 1,247
    Organisation
    Justice League
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The fact that you can't describe or explain how capitalism was restored in China is directly tied to what myself and others have identified as one of our main problems with "Marxist-Leninists", namely their anti-theoretical and anti-intellectual attitudes and overall lack of knowledge.
    Like I said, it has nothing to do with me not being able to do anything, and I will happily discuss this in another topic or in private.

    i think the reason why spawn of stalin became a stalinist bonehead is different than "the millions of proles and poor peasants" that tailed official communism. spawn of stalin is in canada, where official communism are sects. he had to do a conscious effort to like stalin and think that everything against stalin is a bourgeois lie.
    No I am not in Canada and yes I would appreciate it if you would try not to refer to me as a bonehead, especially not when talking about me to somebody. You can prove your point in any number of ways but I do not appreciate being called names. Thank you.

    Yes I did make the conscious decision to like Stalin based on things I had read and learned about the Soviet Union and Marxism-Leninism, but I would not exactly call it an effort. However after years of thinking like an anarchist, I had to open my mind a little and, but I still wouldn't say I made any attempt to find reasons to like him. I also reject your assumption that I think everything against Stalin is a bourgeois lie, I accept some critiques of Stalin, he did some things wrong. But I have never and will never trust statistics from blatantly bourgeois sources.
  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Spawn of Stalin For This Useful Post:


  16. #51
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    Are there though?

    Most Maoists in the west are third world immigrants.
    I'm calling for a source on that, I'm around alot of immigrants due to my community in San Fransisco, and i've never once met any Maoist immigrants. Most immigrants are largely reactionary since they've seen what the shithole "Communist" regimes have done to their countries like China and Vietnam.

    Most maoists are middle class white kids, the only ones i've ever met have been middle class white kids. The same kids with Che on their shirt.

    I'm working class, moms an electrician and dad's a plumber. I take the bus to football practice at my public school every day.

    I would argue that most third world immigrants who are leftist turn out to be Zapatist or Trotskyist, the majority of my small group is compromised of Mexican Americans.

    Like I said, it has nothing to do with me not being able to do anything, and I will happily discuss this in another topic or in private.


    No I am not in Canada and yes I would appreciate it if you would try not to refer to me as a bonehead, especially not when talking about me to somebody. You can prove your point in any number of ways but I do not appreciate being called names. Thank you.

    Yes I did make the conscious decision to like Stalin based on things I had read and learned about the Soviet Union and Marxism-Leninism, but I would not exactly call it an effort. However after years of thinking like an anarchist, I had to open my mind a little and, but I still wouldn't say I made any attempt to find reasons to like him. I also reject your assumption that I think everything against Stalin is a bourgeois lie, I accept some critiques of Stalin, he did some things wrong. But I have never and will never trust statistics from blatantly bourgeois sources.
    What's a critique of Stalin that you accept?
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  17. #52
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I'm calling for a source on that, I'm around alot of immigrants due to my community in San Fransisco, and i've never once met any Maoist immigrants. Most immigrants are largely reactionary since they've seen what the shithole "Communist" regimes have done to their countries like China and Vietnam.

    Most maoists are middle class white kids, the only ones i've ever met have been middle class white kids. The same kids with Che on their shirt.

    I'm working class, moms an electrician and dad's a plumber. I take the bus to football practice at my public school every day.
    I have experience and not a source. Most Maoists in the west as seen at May Day marches in London are from Turkey, Peru or otherwise third world nations, a lot keep their politics largely to themselves. Maoists are not that overly gone with Che so I dont know where you are coming from there...Also Maoist organization in the USA outside of the Black Nation barely exists so again what you say is weird.
  18. The Following User Says Thank You to RedSunRising For This Useful Post:


  19. #53
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    Ok fair enough, you're talking about Europe and I'm talking about the U.S. different circumstances I suppose.

    However, doesn't change the fact that most Marxist Leninists, Maoist third worldists, and che tee shirt communists, in my experience are middle class kids rebelling against authority who don't have the balls to be Blac Bloc anarchists.
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  20. #54
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 5,387
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Just wow!

    The idea that ordinary working people might have something to teach students is now anti-intellectual? Its pretty easy to read books and memorize things out of them, but the stuff that actually stays comes from experience, books are indeed useful for deepening and fully understanding that knowledge but on their own that mean much.
    That wasn't the point. Having been a witness in two different unions as to what the Maoists were doing, it was just the opposite. Maoists went into the working class not to learn but, instantly and arrogantly, to lead. I saw this in a white collar and a blue collar union, where Maoists (Progressive Labor at the time), were constantly wavering between "giving the line" to the workers and "rapping" with them.

    In the meantime, they were completely unable to develop any kind of meaningful program or ongoing organizations. It was pathetic.

    RED DAVE
  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RED DAVE For This Useful Post:


  22. #55
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Most Maoists in the United States are Black Nation revolutionary seperatists and not trendy lefties.
  23. #56
    Join Date Apr 2011
    Posts 935
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    That wasn't the point. Having been a witness in two different unions as to what the Maoists were doing, it was just the opposite. Maoists went into the working class not to learn but, instantly and arrogantly, to lead. I saw this in a white collar and a blue collar union, where Maoists (Progressive Labor at the time), were constantly wavering between "giving the line" to the workers and "rapping" with them.

    In the meantime, they were completely unable to develop any kind of meaningful program or ongoing organizations. It was pathetic.
    LOL...How have Trots worked out the Trade Unions in the United States?

    Do Trots having anything approaching the League of Revolutionary Black Workers that they can show us?
  24. #57
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location we go hard
    Posts 2,871
    Organisation
    What Would Papa John Do?
    Rep Power 38

    Default

    The mistrust/hatred of MLs among anarchists and other non-ML communists is rooted in a long history of betrayal of the working class by various ML parties so as to sustain their own power. From the Red Army's slaughter of workers seeking autonomy and self-determination at Kronstadt to the Soviet Union's total betrayal of the Spanish working class resulting in Franco's rise to power, ML parties have time and time again fought against legitimate revolutionary forces as a means to secure their own power. Anarchists see MLs as a threat to a workers revolution because we recognize the blatant falsehood that is the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" and recognize the impossibility of creating a stateless society through gaining control of the state.
    You seem neat, but...

    They divide us by our color, they divide us by our tongue,
    They divide us men and women, they divide us old and young,
    But they'll tremble at our voices when they hear these verses sung,
    For the Union makes us strong!
  25. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Fawkes For This Useful Post:


  26. #58
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 5,387
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    LOL...How have Trots worked out the Trade Unions in the United States?
    The IS organized groups in Teamster and Auto that still exist today. I was part of that effort.

    Do Trots having anything approaching the League of Revolutionary Black Workers that they can show us?
    The, LRB, which I worked with, unfortunately did not take root, partially because it was destroyed by the pigs.

    Learn your history before you run your mouth.

    RED DAVE
  27. The Following User Says Thank You to RED DAVE For This Useful Post:


  28. #59
    Revolutionary Totalitarianism Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Apr 2010
    Posts 2,240
    Organisation
    The Sex Negative Conspiracy
    Rep Power 67

    Default

    One day I hope there will be no more threads like this. They never lead to any constructive discussion. It's sectarian shitfest from page one.
  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sperm-Doll Setsuna For This Useful Post:


  30. #60
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    LOL...How have Trots worked out the Trade Unions in the United States?

    Do Trots having anything approaching the League of Revolutionary Black Workers that they can show us?
    the trotskyist who's the de facto leader of my group is on the San Fransisco board of labor.
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Geiseric For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Marxist-Leninists support The Holocaust!
    By The Man in forum Anti-Discrimination
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 10th May 2011, 18:48
  2. Question for Maoists/Marxist-Leninists
    By The Man in forum History
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 28th April 2011, 15:21
  3. A question for Marxist-Leninists...
    By Vladimir Innit Lenin in forum Learning
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 25th December 2009, 16:22
  4. For Anti-Revisionist Marxist-Leninists
    By Idealism in forum Learning
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11th May 2009, 10:31

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread