Results 1 to 20 of 23
http://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/vi...?f=110&t=37738
Examples:
So much for the burgeois lie that wherever a communist party takes power, millions are butchered. Most of the Eastern Bloc states killed less people than a single American air raid over Iraq. Perhaps Stalin and Mao's terror cannot be misunderstood to be typical of communist party rule in general?. Of course, the answer to this question is clear: no.
I would be surprised if the same did not apply to the USSR after 1950, by the way.
This also explains why anybody over 30 who is not a rapid rightwinger here in Slovakia would spit in your face if you compared communism to nazism. So much for the "communism is worse than nazism" bullshit. It also explains why I know about multiple Holocaust survivors around me, but no "victim of communism", even if it supposedly killed 250 million people (which is so stupid that it warrants a punch in the face).
Sorry for "Soviet masturbation" thread, but I am pissed off because one of my friend's friends has become a full blown neo-Nazi (he calls himself a "patriot", but is a clear Nazi, he thinks Adolf Hitler had a "good idea", and when my friend confronted him with Hitler's crimes, he says it is irrelevant because "communists killed more than World War 2", of course, he is not even an adult less alone having any idea of what communist rule here was actually like) and I am pissed off about how truth was raped by the parasitic burgeois media.
Compare these numbers with Suharto's genocide:
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/...nd-u-s-empir-1
Now, I still believe in Dubcek's vision of socialism with a human face (and no, it is not capitalism, it worked until Soviet tanks came in August 1968, and no, he was not present in the post-1989 goverment, well, for a short time because of popular vote until he died in a car accident under "mysterious circumstances" [possible car trapping by corrupt pigs like Meciar]), but I don't blame Klement Gottwald for executing some people. When I see what capitalist and fascist pigs do to us and to their own people, I understand why someone might think some people have to be executed. At least Gottwald executed only politicians, and did it at least civilizedly, not by a frenzied mob of Islamic thugs who murder you and thrown your body into a river until corpses stop its flow.
Note this too:
One-third means 35 percent. That makes it significantly worse in the worst affected areas than the Cambodian genocide. Even the worst of Stalin's Yezhovchina in the 1930s USSR (the only period along with Russian Civil War and Maoist China where communits have killed any significant number of people) was not so horrible. At least even Stalin or Mao did not engage on such mass murder that it clogs up the waterways and makes air stink of human flesh. Rot in hell, Suharto.
Suharto was not as bad as direct Dutch colonial rule though.
I've read somewhere that Dutch merchantmen once executed a complete island. The slaves refused to labor so they were transported without food or water to remote places. The healthy ones were killed, the weak ones were left to suffer and rot. But I can't find the source now.
omg lolol
Do you believe in the BS told by imperialist bustards about USSR under Stalin and Mao's China? In this history section, there is a thread related to the "great famine during the Great Leap Forward period". And I myself have repeatedly put books and information regarding the Moscow trial, which were held in open court before eyewitnesses around the world, most from USA, UK and other "western" countries. The eye-witnesses themselves wrote books about the trials and those are very good sources of information.
I am not talking about the GLP, I am aware it was not a "planned man made famine", rather the 1950s purges and the GPCR.
Well, I don't know how much do you know about the purging of the 50's, but I want to inform you that all the trials had been done on open court before eyewitnesses around the world. A huge of lot books had been written by eyewitnesses and others and I have many times posted the list in many of my threads at revleft.
It seems that you are nurturing some wrong ideas about the happenings of USSR during the late 30's. Kindly delete all preconceived ideas and start learning with fresh mind.
Are we talking about the same purges? I mean the 1950s purges in China ... that and the Cultural revolution and the 1930s purges in the USSR.
i think the OP is refering to the fact that ~700,000 were executed in the Soviet Union when Stalin was in power
What the fuck is this supposed to mean?Troll?
In response to the OP though, no one with just a basic knowledge of the Eastern Bloc states claims they killed millions.
That's it. That's also the problem with the left communist narrative (not that I have anything against it) that every existing state ruled by a communist party was "Stalinist". Most of these states executed around 1000x less people that actual Stalin regime. And the 700 000 executed is not burgeois propaganda, that's the number from the Soviet archives (which I trust unlike the overinflated bullshit from capitalist propaganda such as Stalin killed 60 million etc.).
Plus, during the 1930s and until 1948, even disregarding the 2 famines, nutritional deficiences prevailed. Only in the early 1950s did the food situation got back to normal. Look the per capita calorie consumption data from ComradeOm and how the life expectancy jumps up in 1950, see it on gapminder.org . Life in the Soviet Union? Good, normal, but only from 1950s onwards.
The common Westerners has no such knowledge, instead, they just extrapolate Stalin's and Mao's crimes to every communist ruled state that ever existed. That, and they think North Korea or some other modern day closed isolated dictatorship is a standard socialist state (it is not standard and not even socialist).
Well, the question is what is the % of total population that 700,000 people consist of? Remember that class struggle was most intensified in USSR and also it had to suffer from more than 95% of the attacks done against socialist countries. Comrade Toppler, can you give a comparative analysis of workers and revolutionaries died in USSR and in other eastern European countries? I am sure that the ratio would be more than 1000.
Life expectancy and other factors began to improve at 1950 onwards because 1945 is the end of imperialist attacks started from 1917 November onwards and (amazingly) it would take 5 years to normal stage after such a prolonged period of internal and external war.
You can't compare the casualties of the Socialist countries like the USSR with the western imperialist countries losses,as ww2 took a much harder toll on the USSR than on the western countries (in terms of people and economy)
Indeed and there was an added racial emphasis to killings as we all know
By the way, notice this:
Now, Rakosi was a notorious asshole and a liar who branded many of his opponents as fascist, but considering Hungary's fascist regime just a few years before, some of these executions were certainly done on actual fascist war criminals.
So much for the "every "victim of communism" is an innocent dissident" lie.
Also, the number of political executions in most Eastern Bloc (except for Romania, but, well, I don't even consider that whacked out psychopath Caucescau to be a legitimate leftist much less a communist) states after 1961 is probably zero. There was still a lot of unjustified repression after that, but most of the time, not even jail, just a "friendly warning" or "your kid will not go into high school if you continue writing samizdats" kind of stuff. No bloodshed.
I don't think that anyone in the left-communist side thinks that mass executions are a defining point of "Stalinism", though.
"Win, lose or draw...long as you squabble and you get down, that's gangsta."
Its not hard to destroy arguments not held by anyone who has botherd to look into the history of the Eastern Bloc