Thread: NEWSFEED: US union struggles

Results 101 to 120 of 275

  1. #101
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Teamsters United rallies members against Hoffa Jr.'s concessions

    By Daniel Ginsberg

    Chicago, IL - Workers fighting back against economic inequality have something to be hopeful about. One of the largest and most powerful unions in the country, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, will begin mailing ballots early October for members to decide the next general president. Those fighting against concessions to employers and looking for a stronger worker movement are uniting behind Fred Zuckerman and the Teamsters United slate, hoping to unseat long-standing General President James P. Hoffa, Jr.

    "I'm supporting Teamsters United because I want our leadership to fight for our members and not the company's interests," said Lena Molina, a nine-year UPS worker from Teamsters Local 63 in California.

    The Teamsters have been under the leadership of General President James P. Hoffa, Jr. for 17 years. The son of Jimmy Hoffa, Sr. who ran the Teamsters from 1958 to 1971, Hoffa Jr. has overseen a rise in concessions to employers, the weakening of pensions and a decline in union democracy.

    “Teamsters are uniting because of Hoffa’s 17 years of failed leadership. Teamsters are fed up with the corruption and betrayal,” Fred Zuckerman told Fight Back!. “This has resulted in contract concessions, losing our standard of living and for hundreds of thousands of Teamsters losing their pensions. Teamsters are looking for leadership that will stand with them, not with the employers.”

    Fred Zuckerman, Hoffa Jr.'s challenger, is the president of Teamsters Local 89, one of the largest Teamster locals. Zuckerman has served the union at every level and rose to national prominence by opposing Hoffa's concessionary contract to UPS and by speaking out against Hoffa's lack of response to such things as the pension crisis and subcontracting.

    UPS feeder drivers are in a real struggle to stop the company from undermining their work by using cheaper, nonunion subcontractors.

    Andrew May, a feeder driver out of Teamsters Local 344 explained why he favors Zuckerman.

    "I am supporting Zuckerman because we need a leader who has fought subcontracting and is willing to fight for stronger language in our contract. Zuckerman fought subcontracting at Holland and was in process of fighting it in UPS before Hoffa forced the contract onto the members."

    While some of the latest news in the Teamsters has been the dramatic cuts to 400,000 Teamsters in the Central States Pension Fund, fresh on the minds of UPS workers has been the concessionary contract Hoffa handed UPS at a time when UPS was making record profits.

    Mark Timlin, a UPS package driver and leader of the Vote No movement at UPS, decided to get involved with the Teamsters United campaign. He pointed out that Hoffa Jr. was never a worker and doesn't understand worker issues.

    "Hoffa Jr. was once a corporate lawyer while Fred Zuckerman came up from the rank and file and listens and understands Teamsters. Zuckerman and his Teamsters United slate will put an end to contracts being negotiated on corporate terms," Timlin commented.

    Part-time Teamsters are also campaigning for the Teamsters United slate hoping for more full-time jobs and better working conditions in the warehouses.

    "I want to know that when I organize on the shop floor that my union will listen to us. But instead we have this culture brought by Hoffa to accept the conditions we work under and discourage change," said Gabriella Anderson, a part-time UPS worker in Utah.

    The campaign is heating up as Teamsters from around the country are organizing to stop Hoffa's concessions. In a time of growing economic uncertainty and disparity, Fred Zuckerman and the Teamsters United slate will bring a new era that Teamsters can be proud of and will also bring a significant contribution to the entire working class in their fight against corporate greed.

    "Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. has been running this union since 1999, the entire time I've been working at UPS," said Benjamin Cline, a ten-year Teamster volunteering for the Teamsters United campaign. "I continue to watch companies like UPS reach record profits year after year while our contracts have gotten worse. We want is a leadership with as much fight as the members. This should be inspiring for all workers, not just Teamsters.”

    Read more News and Views from the Peoples Struggle at http://www.fightbacknews.org. You can write to us at [email protected]
  2. #102
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Harvard workers revive the strike as students join picket lines



    By staff

    Boston, MA - Harvard, the world’s wealthiest university, saw its first workers’ strike in over 30 years this week as Harvard University Dining Service (HUDS). Food service workers, members of UNITE HERE Local 26 took to the picket lines on Oct. 5. Workers were in contract negotiations with the Harvard administration since the end of May. The administration is refusing to budge on key workers’ demands including equitable healthcare, year-round employment, and a racial justice task force to promote equality at work.

    Students from across the Harvard system are showing their support for the strike by issuing statements of solidarity, sharing meals with striking workers, and most importantly, reinforcing the picket lines. Almost 3000 students signed a petition supporting the HUDS workers strike, and now over 400 are pledged to stand on picket lines until worker’ demands are met.

    A large coalition of student organizations issued joint declarations of support for the strike. Just this week, the Harvard chapter of the National Lawyers Guild and Reclaim Harvard Law released a co-authored, bilingual statement exposing that African American, Latino, Haitian and other oppressed nationalities and women are often given the lowest paying jobs at the law school and rarely receive promotions.

    Undergraduate students have also held ‘dine-ins’ with the HUDS workers. Students and workers then share a meal and discuss the HUDS struggle and the experiences of Harvard’s workers.

    Last week on Sept. 30, students and workers held a joint rally building towards the strike, followed by a worker speak-out in the main lounge of Harvard Law School. In response to the widespread student support for the HUDS strike, the Harvard Law School administration was forced to shut down law school cafeterias, rather than bringing in scabs to break the strike.

    “Harvard has a long history of pitting its own students against workers. One president of the university, Abbott Lowell, owned a steel mill north of campus. The steel workers at the mill joined the famous Bread and Roses Strike of 1912 in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Harvard President Lowell offered students a passing grade on their mid-term exams if they would agree to reinforce the Massachusetts State Militia in harassing the workers and breaking the picket line,” explained Harvard Law student Collin Poirot during an Oct. 6 student-worker solidarity rally.

    Poirot finished his speech, “These students traded in their solidarity and support for working-class people in exchange for good grades and upward mobility. We will never make that mistake again.”

    While solidarity with the Harvard workers continues to grow on campus, it is apparent that the Harvard administration is negotiating on behalf of the financial elites who control the Harvard Corporation.

    The HUDS workers are winning and participation is increasing with the Harvard Union of Clerical and Technical Workers (HUCTW), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and other workers joining them. On Oct. 7, UNITE HERE Local 26 members from hotels and universities across the city of Boston rallied with Harvard workers.

    The HUDS workers are fierce in their commitment to winning this campaign. It is likely that solidarity with Harvard workers will spread to other campuses and cities in coming weeks, showing that reviving the strike is a good way to win.

    Read more News and Views from the Peoples Struggle at http://www.fightbacknews.org. You can write to us at [email protected]
  3. #103
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    BREAKING: Contractors Sue to Block Executive Order!


    Lobbyists representing big federal contractors filed a lawsuit to block implementation of President Obama’s Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order.

    The Executive Order – set to go into effect on October 25, 2016 – protects low-wage workers on federal contracts from wage theft and other labor law violations. If federal contractors prevail, millions of workers will continue to be victimized by unscrupulous contractors.

    TAKE ACTION: Tell Contractors to Stop Blocking Obama’s Executive Order to Stop Wage Theft on Federal Contracts!

    Read below about why the Executive Order is important...


    President's Order Protects Workers from 'Outlaw Contractors'

    By Professor Gordon Lafer

    “ … Lobbyists claim that the U.S. procurement system already has enough safeguards in place to protect workers from unscrupulous contractors.

    The facts show the opposite. In fact, the largest federal contractor at the U.S. Capitol itself has been breaking the law literally under their noses of our elected officials.

    Over the past year, Good Jobs Nation — a group representing 2 million low-wage employees of federal contractors — filed multiple legal complaints on behalf of cooks and cleaners at the Senate and Capitol dining halls, aiming to recover stolen wages and stop illegal retaliation for exercising their right to organize a union.

    Contract “outlaws” are not, of course, limited to Capitol Hill.

    Since 2013, Good Jobs Nation has filed more than 30 legal complaints on behalf of 1500 workers documenting systemic wage theft, misclassification, and other labor law violations at the Pentagon, the Ronald Reagan Building the Smithsonian Museums, and other federal offices in Washington, D.C.

    While these workers serve senators, members of Congress, and agency staff, their employers have stolen an estimated $5 million dollars from employee paychecks, and have repeatedly violated health and safety regulations and labor law, according to legal complaints filed by Good Jobs Nation.”

    TAKE ACTION: Tell Contractors to Stop Blocking Obama’s Executive Order to Stop Wage Theft on Federal Contracts!







    Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from Good Jobs Nation, please click here.
  4. #104
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Oct 14 forum: Striking Harvard U Dining Service Workers Speak!


    Please share widely! facebook event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/1623983967899566/



    Harvard U. strike! Trying to survive capitalism

    By Phebe Eckfeldt
    Cambridge, Mass.

    It was 5 a.m. on Oct. 5 and Harvard University Dining Services workers were already marching on a strike picket line, rather than serving up eggs and bacon on a cafeteria breakfast line. The workers, many of them immigrants, half of them people of color, are going toe-to-toe with an elite Ivy League university with a $37.6 billion endowment.

    The 750 rank-and-file members of UNITE HERE Local 26 are striking because Harvard has refused to back down from its “take-away” cuts to workers’ retirement and health benefits.

    The university has also refused to honor a previous HUDS contract agreement guaranteeing workers a $35,000 minimum yearly wage. Nearly half are earning less than that now. According to the MIT Living Wage Calculator, even that salary is listed as not adequate to support more than a one-person household in Boston. (STAT.com)

    In addition, HUDS workers are fighting for the right to establish a task force to combat racism in the kitchens, stop management bias against hiring formerly incarcerated people and permit immigrant workers to take leaves of up to a year with job security.

    ‘We aren’t budging!’

    By midmorning, thousands of workers from 20 dining halls and 40 picket lines, along with supporters, converged and marched into Harvard Square chanting, “Hey, Harvard, you can’t hide! We can see your greedy side!”

    The next day, Oct. 6, close to a thousand workers and allies marched again, this time through Harvard Yard in a half-mile trek, banging drums and roaring chants so that even the remotest realms of Harvard’s ivory towers shook with the unstoppable surge. They were joined by Massachusetts AFL-CIO President Steven Tolman. On Oct. 8, HUDS workers and supporters marched and rallied again at the Harvard/Cornell football game.

    Local 26 Chief Steward Ed Childs told Workers World, “We aren’t budging!” on demands protecting the minimum yearly wage, retirement and health benefits. He stressed that increased health care premiums and higher co-pays would be particularly devastating for the dining hall workers, who get laid off three months every summer, but as “seasonal educational workers” are not allowed to collect unemployment insurance.

    Childs emphasized that the privatized health care system was in failure mode when a multibillion-dollar institution refuses to supply adequate and affordable health care to its workers.

    At one of the rallies, a HUDS worker with Type 2 diabetes said she has a hard time, even now, affording her insulin and testing supplies. If her insurance goes up, she could suffer kidney failure or a heart attack without needed medications.

    Harvard Medical School students backed up the workers In a StatNews op-ed, saying the university’s attack on workers’ health insurance is a matter of life and death: “As physicians in training, we cannot stand by as the world’s richest university forces its most vulnerable employees to choose between dinner and a doctor’s visit.”

    A member of the Racial Justice Coalition at Harvard Medical School, Darshali Vyas, told the press, “We now also know that more than half of HUDS workers identify as people of color -- a level of diversity not reflected elsewhere at the University -- and that many of these workers represent minority and immigrant families living in Boston. Protecting their access to affordable health-care coverage is intimately tied to racial justice.”

    “The cuts proposed by Harvard are anti-LGBTQ,” asserted Ted Waechter in his article, “The HUDS Strike Is So Gay,” in the student Crimson newspaper. He explained: “The proposed co-pay increases would devastate queer and trans workers in particular. When we make healthcare unaffordable, we keep queer and trans people from accessing gender-affirming treatments, like hormone therapy and gender-confirmation surgery.”

    Local 26 HUDS workers fought for and won one of the country’s first sexual orientation nondiscrimination provisions, and are currently fighting for provisions based on gender identity.

    HUDScoalition battles corporate power

    Workers at Harvard are up against an “education” corporation that is part of big business profit making and the 1%, in an interlocking relationship with the military-industrial complex and big banks like Goldman-Sachs, Bank of America and Citigroup. The governing body of the university is literally Harvard Corporation -- “the oldest corporation in the Western Hemisphere,” dating back to the mid-17th century. (harvard.edu)

    To do battle with this behemoth, the rank-and-file dining hall workers have put together a town-gown-community coalition that is a powerful model for how to win. Coalition members endorsing and organizing for the strike include the undergraduate Harvard School of Public Health, the Student Labor Action Movement, the Undergraduate Council and the Editorial Board of the famed student newspaper, the Crimson. Faculty and nonunion employees are supporting the strike, as they’re also having their health benefits cut.

    Unity also comes from Harvard Law School students, who protested university racism by occupying their own college in February. Both the Cambridge City Council and the Boston Homeless Solidarity Committee have endorsed the strike.

    And the dining hall workers have built wide solidarity over many years, from their opposition to South African apartheid to their support for Indigenous and Palestinian struggles.

    Dedicated union solidarity comes from the “old-style” militant Boston School Bus Drivers Union, Steelworkers Local 8751; the custodians of Service Employees Local 32 B-J; and the IWW “Wobbly” Cambridge local. Teamsters Local 25 has pledged to honor the picket line and refuse to pick up trash or make freight and equipment deliveries.

    This strike forcefully raises the class question: How can workers survive a capitalism that will not pay them a wage that they and their families can survive on, and that will not provide adequate health care -- a matter of life or death?

    In socialist Cuba, medical care is completely free to all citizens and has no links to profit. In Cuba there is, in fact, no need for “health insurance” or for having to pay out money monthly to have a safety net against for-profit medical or Big Pharma bills.

    Harvard University is rich enough to provide affordable health care to all its workers, but it will not do so without a fight. It will not because, like Verizon or Veolia or any other capitalist corporation, it needs profits to survive. Paying health care or other benefits to workers is not profitable. As capitalism decays, corporations and banks are employing fewer workers to do more work at less wages with minimal or no benefits.

    HUDS workers have drawn the line.

    The strike by the Harvard dining hall workers in their struggle for health care, for adequate pay, for what they need to survive is a new heroic battle in the centuries-old struggle of workers to take back our lives and our work.

    Steve Gillis, Martha Grevatt, Milt Neidenberg, Minnie Bruce Pratt and Gerry Scoppettuolo contributed to this article.









    --
    This message was sent to [email protected]

    You are subscribed to IAC Solidarity Center action alerts.
    Our mailing address is:
    IAC Solidarity Center
    147 W 24th St
    2nd FL
    New York, NY 10011

    Add us to your address book @solidarityweb.com

    Unsubscribe from this list

    powered by phpList
  5. #105
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Tell Lobbyists: Stop Defending Wage Theft in Federal Contracts



    Website: www.progressivecongress.org

    Facebook: www.facebook.com/ProgressiveCongress

    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ProgCongress

    Dear Chris,

    Stealing wages and denying workers fair pay are some of the worst forms of labor rights abuse.

    Unfortunately, wage theft at the Senate, the Pentagon and other national landmarks has become a huge problem.

    President Barack Obama recently signed the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order to stop wage theft and other legal violations on federal contracts. That's great news for workers, and apparently terrible news for lobbyists and CEOs who dread paying federal contract workers a fair wage.

    Now, lobbyists for powerful federal contractors have filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order from being implemented. Tell lobbyists to stop defending wage theft.



    Our friends at Good Jobs Nation have been doing incredible work to protect employees from discrimination and ensure that they are treated fairly. After pressure from Good Jobs Nation and other labor rights advocates, President Obama has signed an executive order that includes comprehensive protections for federal contract workers that have not existed. This not only ensures the President's good jobs legacy, but ensures that federal contract workers have the same labor rights as other workers and cannot be taken advantage of.

    Tell lobbyists: Federal contract workers deserve fair pay and fair working conditions. Stop trying to get away with wage theft.


    Above: Workers protesting wage theft.



    Thank you for helping us to fight for good jobs for all workers.

    In Solidarity,

    The Progressive Congress Action Fund Team



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This email was delivered to you by Progressive Congress Action Fund.


    Click here to unsubscribe.

    If you unsubscribe from Progressive Congress Action Fund we will not send you further emails, per our permission-based email policy. The best way to contact Progressive Congress Action Fund is by using the Contact Us form on our website, by phone at 202-449-9495 or at our physical address, 600 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 340, Washington DC 20003.

    If you received this email from a friend or colleague and would like to sign up for email alerts, please click here to subscribe.

    Progressive Congress Action Fund is a 501(c)4 organization that amplifies and strengthens connections between change makers in the grassroots Progressive community and lawmakers in Congress. We provide access to innovative, forward-thinking ideas and serve as the vital linkage between message makers on and off the Hill as we shape a progressive agenda.

    empowered by Salsa
  6. #106
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    IUF News

    Newly leaked TISA texts expose the scope of the corporate power grab

    Posted: 14 Oct 2016 05:56 AM PDT

    Newly published leaked documents from the top secret Trade in Services (TISA) negotiations reveal the wide scope of the deregulatory agenda and attack on democratic governance at the heart of the negotiations.

    You are subscribed to email updates from IUF News.
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States
  7. #107
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Harvard has $35 billion. Campus workers want $35,000.


    Dear Chris


    I go to the richest university on the planet, but that hasn’t stopped our administration from trying to make healthcare unaffordable for its dining hall workers. Harvard University Dining Service workers, members of Unite Here Local 26 have been on strike for 17 days to demand fair working conditions. Harvard has an endowment of over $35 billion, and workers on my campus are asking for an income of just $35,000 and no price hikes on health insurance.

    Will you support striking Harvard workers and tell President Faust to show them the respect they deserve?

    Student Labor Action Movement, USAS Local 5 is mobilizing students in solidarity with workers to fight back against these attacks. We’re winning huge support already. Half of the undergraduate student body has signed a petition in support of worker demands; the Boston and Cambridge City Councils have joined the Harvard Undergraduate Council in endorsing the strike; and on Monday hundreds of students walked out of class to demonstrate to the administration that workers are an integral part of the Harvard community and we will not tolerate exploitation on our campus. The Harvard Corporation is still hiding behind its greed. We need your help. Tell President Faust to end the strike and offer affordable health care and a sustainable income for Harvard workers.

    If you are able, please support the Harvard Dining Hall workers’ Strike Assistance Fund.

    We know that when students and workers unite, we’re unstoppable! We’ll be in the streets until dining hall workers get the income and benefits they deserve.


    In solidarity,

    Tim Shea

    Harvard SLAM, USAS Local 5





    United Students Against Sweatshops | USAS.org
    Organizing for Student and Worker Power
    Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from USAS - United Students Against Sweatshops, please click here.
  8. #108
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Riviera stagehands waiting for contract / Labor Beat video



    JAM Productions Stalls on Contract for Riviera Stagehands

    On YouTube at: https://youtu.be/DApDAIWZRXM

    + YouTube Video
    ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.


    On October 20, 2016 Stagehands Local 2 (IATSE) and friends held a “trick-or-treat” protest in front of the Chicago offices of JAM Productions, demanding that JAM give the workers the union contract they are entitled to after winning a union election at the Riviera theater. Reverend C.J. Hawking from Arise Chicago emceed the rally. A small band made up of members of the Chicago Federation of Musicians (Local 10-208) performed lively tunes. Robert Reiter, Jr., Secretary-Treasurer of the Chicago Federation of Labor, talked about the benefits of having unions, and Stagehands Business Manager Craig Carlson explained the Unfair Labor Practices that Local 2 filed against JAM Productions.

    In the Halloween spirit, a number of workers wore masks and costumes, and watched Reverend John Thomas and Father Larry Dowling go up to the 2nd floor offices to try to meet with JAM Productions and deliver a letter. But, as the video shows, they got the door slammed in their faces. No treat, just a rude trick. Length: 11:10


    Two clergy members knock on JAM’s door to deliver letter. But JAM called the cops. Photo: Labor Beat


    Contribute today to the Labor Beat (Committee for Labor Access) fund drive. Info at:
    http://goo.gl/xV4ojb

    Produced by Labor Beat. Labor Beat is a CAN TV Community Partner. Labor Beat is a non-profit 501(c)(3) member of IBEW 1220. Views are those of the producer Labor Beat. For info: [email protected], www.laborbeat.org. 312-226-3330. For other Labor Beat videos, visit YouTube and search "Labor Beat". On Chicago CAN TV Channel 19, Thursdays 9:30 pm; Fridays 4:30 pm. Labor Beat has regular cable slots in Chicago, Evanston, Rockford, Urbana, IL; Philadelphia, PA; Princeton, NJ; and Rochester, NY.

    UPDATE. Labor Beat adds a new city. We welcome Cambridge, MA to our list of cities (7) where we are on cable-tv as a series.
  9. #109
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Harvard strike escalates as students occupy negotiations office



    By staff

    Cambridge, MA – Oct. 24 marks day 20 of the Harvard University Dining Service (HUDS) workers’ strike. The HUDS union, UNITE HERE Local 26, has been negotiating since May of this year with management. Harvard bosses refuse to budge on two key demands: fair healthcare and sustainable salaries for all full-time employees.

    Harvard’s students and workers are organizing together to put pressure on Harvard administrators.

    “There are two competing visions for the future of the Harvard community; a school that runs like a corporation and puts profit over people, or one that teaches solidarity and is controlled by the working-class people who keep this place running,” said Daniel Espo, a second-year student at Harvard Law School.

    Workers sent a loud message earlier in the struggle by focusing on the financial elites who rule over the Harvard Corporation. Local 26 coordinated with union locals across the country to send worker solidarity delegations to the corporate offices of each of the 12 fellows of the Harvard Corporation.

    Following this strategy of targeted disruption, students at Harvard organized phone bank events. Students called the Harvard Fellows on their personal and work phone numbers, leaving messages to express their outrage at the poor treatment given the people who prepare and serve their meals. One fellow, William Lee, was visited multiple times at his office in downtown Boston, first by workers and then by students. Students also sent hundreds of signed postcards to Harvard Fellows demanding they give HUDS a decent contract.

    On Saturday, Oct. 22, Teamsters, SEIU and other unions joined HUDS workers in a march of over a thousand. The rally marched through rain and heavy wind before gathering on the front steps of the Cambridge City Hall. Vice Mayor Marc McGovern came out and spoke in solidarity.

    On Oct. 24, Harvard students escalated their tactics. 400 students walked out of their classrooms and into the streets. The students marched to 124 Mount Auburn Street, where negotiations are held. Hundreds of students packed the building lobby, with the crowd erupting into chants, “When Harvard workers are under attack, what do we do? Stand up, fight back!”

    Harvard negotiators were peeking out of their office windows to get a better look at the crowd. After 15 minutes of chanting, students decided to launch a spontaneous sit-in. The students chose not to leave the building lobby until Harvard negotiators gave the union a new offer. To keep spirits high, students sang songs including Solidarity Forever and We Shall Overcome.

    “The only way to make sure the strike succeeds is to continue this kind of direct action that confronts the financial elites at the top of the ladder,” said second-year law student Collin Poirot.

    Poirot continued, “Right now the administration thinks it can handle the strike without causing too much disruption. Our job is to amplify the strike by creating new crises that the Administration can’t handle.”

    Read more News and Views from the Peoples Struggle at http://www.fightbacknews.org. You can write to us at [email protected]
  10. #110
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    WITH link: ULP Strike against Michael Foods in Lansing, IL - Labor Beat video


    ULP Strike against Michael Foods

    On YouTube at: https://youtu.be/r0juV0UaBn8

    + YouTube Video
    ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.


    Lansing, IL - Oct. 25, 2016. Seventy workers last week went on an unfair labor practices strike at an egg processing plant owned by Michael Foods, Inc. They are organized by UFCW Local 881, and the company is now trying to force employees to train workers who will then end up becoming their replacements after planned layoffs. Arise Chicago has also begun to build support for the predominantly Spanish-speaking workforce.

    Jorge Mujica of Arise Chicago interviewed and translated two workers at the plant. Griselda Santana Albores told him “I walked out because of unfair treatment on the part of the company. They told us we would be fired in a short lapse of time and that’s incredibly unfair to be told in two weeks you’re going to be out of a job. There are people here who are elderly, and we all have dependents, I have my kids, and I have to support my parents in Mexico.” She also described the sexual harassment women got from management when ask to take restroom breaks. Length - 7:21


    Griselda Santana Albores, striking worker at Michael Foods, with Jorge Mujica. Photo: David Vance / Labor Beat


    Contribute today to the Labor Beat (Committee for Labor Access) fund drive. Info at:
    http://goo.gl/xV4ojb

    Produced by Labor Beat. Labor Beat is a CAN TV Community Partner. Labor Beat is a non-profit 501(c)(3) member of IBEW 1220. Views are those of the producer Labor Beat. For info: [email protected], www.laborbeat.org. 312-226-3330. For other Labor Beat videos, visit YouTube and search "Labor Beat". On Chicago CAN TV Channel 19, Thursdays 9:30 pm; Fridays 4:30 pm. Labor Beat has regular cable slots in Chicago, Evanston, Rockford, Urbana, IL; Philadelphia, PA; Princeton, NJ; Rochester, NY; and Cambridge, MA (new).

    UPDATE. Labor Beat welcomes Cambridge, MA to our list of cities (7) where we are on cable-tv as a series. Dining hall workers at Harvard have been on strike and students have gone out in support. Recently the Teamsters donated $10,000 to the workers. This is an important time for Labor Beat to start pro-union cable-tv in that town.
  11. #111
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Huge victory in Harvard dining hall workers strike
    “We accomplished everything”



    By staff

    Cambridge, MA - Harvard University dining hall workers will end their strike tomorrow morning, Oct. 27, and return to work after reaching an agreement with the university that meets all of their demands. Harvard dining hall workers are reviewing and voting to ratify the contract agreement through 5 p.m. today, when this decision will become official.

    Harvard dining hall workers went on strike Oct. 5 to win affordable health care and sustainable annual incomes. While the world watched, the lowest-paid workers on campus stood up to the richest university in the world. Through a strike of 22 days, this group of food service workers led a national conversation that ultimately forced one of the most powerful educational institutions to concede.

    Students, faculty and alumni supported the strike.

    A statement from UNITE HERE Local 26 gave the highlights of the strikes accomplishments, stating it is, “A five-year agreement that meets all our goals:

    No health care costs will be shifted onto our members. Our health care plan will not change for two years. In 2019 Harvard will institute co-pay increases but will pay them for our members. Additionally, our premiums will go down.

    We achieved a sustainable annual income of $35,000. In recognition of workers’ needs for sustainable income, Harvard is offering additional compensation in three installments during the summer. It will begin at $2400 in 2017 and rise to $3000 in 2020.

    Retroactive wage increases on par with other unionized workers on campus of more than 2.5% a year.

    Diversity and Equality Committee to address concerns regarding diversity and equal treatment of Harvard dining hall employees.

    Benefits for Strikers: Harvard will cover the costs of all deductions for strikers for the duration of the strike; including medical insurance, parking, car and home insurance, and T pass deductions.”

    Read more News and Views from the Peoples Struggle at http://www.fightbacknews.org. You can write to us at [email protected]

    - - - Updated - - -

    I'm on strike & I need your help!


    Dear Chris,

    My coworkers and I are on STRIKE to STOP wage theft and misclassification in Michael Kors’ supply chain. Intermodal Bridge Transport, my employer and a supplier of Michael Kors, is violating U.S. labor laws and Michael Kors’ own Code of Conduct.

    CALL Michael Kors RIGHT NOW: 212-201-8100, press 0 and leave a message that port drivers and warehouse workers are on STRIKE & demand that the company stop doing business with lawbreaking trucking company Intermodal Bridge Transport.



    My name is Jose Ortiz and I’m one of the port truck drivers that makes sure these products arrive on time in good condition. And I’m angry that Michael Kors doesn’t require more from the companies that they do business with to ensure that my job is safe and secure. Instead, my coworkers and I are misclassified port truck drivers. Even more, we experience wage theft and even the National Labor Relations Board has found merit to our charges of misclassification and unfair treatment.

    Can you call Michael Kors today at 212-201-8100, press 0 and tell them to implement their Code of Conduct on companies like Intermodal Bridge Transport?

    I thank you deeply for your support.

    Sincerely,
    Jose Ortiz
    Port Truck Driver
    Intermodal Bridge Transport

    Action Network
    Sent via Action Network, a free online toolset anyone can use to organize. Click here to sign up and get started building an email list and creating online actions today.
    Action Network is an open platform that empowers individuals and groups to organize for progressive causes. We encourage responsible activism, and do not support using the platform to take unlawful or other improper action. We do not control or endorse the conduct of users and make no representations of any kind about them.
    You can unsubscribe or update your email address by changing your subscription preferences here.
  12. #112
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    POLITICO

    Good Jobs Nation Launches National Wage Theft Hotline [1-844-PAY-FAIR] & Defense Contract Workers Strike at Los Angeles Port as Texas Court Temporarily Halts Obama Effort to Crack-down on Labor Law Violators. Read more …



    Workers on Strike at the Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach.
    By Marianne Levine

    Worker advocates blasted a Texas court for issuing a preliminary injunction against final regulations that require companies to disclose previous labor law violations whenever they bid on a large federal contract.

    The regulations, which implement a President Obama's Fair Pay & Safe Workplaces Executive Order, were set to take effect on October 25.

    Joseph Geevarghese, director of Good Jobs Nation, a labor group, said that "historically, courts have deferred to the president's power to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent on responsible contractors who follow federal laws." He added that "if the courts respect precedent, the lawsuit will ultimately fail."

    Christine Owens, executive director at the National Employment Law Project, said the ruling "merely temporarily delays the full implementation of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order."

    Good Jobs Nation, anticipating the eventual implementation of the order, used the occasion to launch a national wage theft hotline for workers employed by federal contractors. Paco Fabian, spokesman for the group, explained to Politico that workers may register their legal complaints at 1-844-PAY-FAIR.

    The hotline launch comes on the same day that port truck drivers in California went on strike. The drivers, who work for California Cartage, a federal contractor, allege that they are misclassified as independent contractors.









    Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from Good Jobs Nation, please click here.
  13. #113
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Update on the International Campaign in Solidarity with the South African Students


    Dear Sisters and Brothers,

    Please find attached Special Issue (No. 15) of InfoInter devoted to the international campaign in solidarity with the South African students. InfoInter is the weekly newsletter building the Mumbai Open World Conference Against War, Exploitation and Precarious Labour (Nov. 18-20, 2016).

    We are also attaching a very significant statement from AFT 2121 in solidarity with the striking students in South Africa. (This statement just arrived this morning, after the special issue of InfoInter had already gone to the printer's.)

    AFT 2121 is the union local that represents the faculty at City College of San Francisco (CCSF), a community college that was placed on the chopping block of privatization a number of years ago by its accrediting agency of junior colleges in California: the ACCJC.

    AFT 2121 spearheaded a coalition of faculty, students and campus workers that pushed back this privatization effort and ultimately succeeded in getting rid of the ACCJC.

    Countless rallies, student and faculty occupation of administrative buildings, one-day walkouts, marches to City Hall (with takeovers of administrative offices) during these many years got the S.F. City Attorney, Dennis Herrera, to file a lawsuit against ACCJC -- which was ultimately victorious.

    As you will read in their statement, AFT 2121's top priority today is to get Prop W passed; this is a ballot proposition that would increase the taxes on the very rich in San Francisco and earmark those funds for City College so that tuition can be free.

    Thanks for your continued support to this work,

    In solidarity,

    Alan Benjamin
    Member of the Mumbai Conference
    Organizing Committee

    2 attachments
    InfoInter_15_ENG.pdf
    1100K
    AFT 2121 Fees Must Fall.pdf
    282K
  14. #114
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016.../harv-o31.html


    Harvard concedes main demands of dining hall workers to end strike

    By Mike Ingram

    31 October 2016

    After three weeks on strike, Harvard University Dining Service (HUDS) workers returned to work last week with a new contract that appears to satisfy the main issues of health care and wages that prompted the strike. The agreement was ratified in a 537-1 vote Wednesday by members of UNITE HERE Local 26, which represents the workers, concluding the 22-day strike that was the first for the workers since 1983.

    The strike had won significant support from both students and faculty at the Harvard campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Following the announcement of the strike on September 17, more than a dozen student organizations at Harvard Law School released a statement supporting the action. More than 3,000 students signed a petition started by the undergraduate Students Labor Action Movement in support of the workers’ demands.

    A number of organizations endorsed the strike including Harvard’s Undergraduate Council, the Law School Student Government, the Kennedy School Student Government, and the editorial board of the Crimson, the student newspaper. Even the Boston Globe published official endorsements of the strike and both the Boston and Cambridge City Councils passed resolutions of support.

    Students rejected calls by the Harvard administration for student employees to cross the picket line and scab on the HUDS workers and instead joined the picket lines and organized class walkouts and occupations in support. Students at Harvard College and other graduate programs flooded the voicemail inboxes of the 13 fellows who sit on the board of Harvard Corporation with messages of support for the HUDS workers.

    According to UNITE HERE Local 26, the union representing HUDS, employees would not see an increase to their out-of-pocket health care costs with the contract, which will last five years. Local 26 President Brian Lang told a crowd gathered at the First Parish Church as voting took place, “we have achieved every goal without exception, with no concessions to Harvard.”

    A Diversity and Equality Committee will also be created to “address concerns regarding diversity and equal treatment of Harvard dining hall employees,” according to a Local 26 press release.

    While the new contract appears to satisfy the main demands of the union, these demands were based on maintaining the status quo on health benefits and obtaining minimal wage increases. Under the new contract workers’ earnings remain barely above poverty level in a metropolitan area where rents and other living costs are far above the national average.

    Harvard had demanded huge increases in both health care premiums and out-of-pocket costs. The proposal by Harvard would have required a worker earning $30,000 a year to contribute a premium of $233 a month in addition to co-pays, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. This amounts exceeds what can be found on the Massachusetts Health Connector, the state’s version of Obamacare.

    Harvard eventually backed down, agreeing to cover copayments as workers are moved to a new health plan, beginning in 2019. The costs will be covered by a flexible savings account paid for by Harvard. While the university made a significant concession in agreeing to cover the higher costs, Harvard achieved the goal of shifting workers onto the new plan, opening the way for imposing these out-of-pocket costs fully onto workers in the future.

    The deal gives full-time workers a guaranteed annual income of $35,000, but the wage increases are minimal: 2.5 percent per year. The remainder of the increased income is in the form of a stipend for the period when dining halls are closed during for the summer and winter breaks.

    Under the new contract full-time workers will receive an annual $2,400 stipend, rising to $3,000 in 2020. The stipend amounts to about $185 per week for 13 weeks, far less than the $800 per week workers earn during the academic year. For employees who work fewer hours during the academic year, the stipend will be “prorated,” meaning it will be adjusted in relation to the number of hours an employee works. Only full-time employees who are available to work throughout the year will make $35,000 a year.

    At some other universities such as Yale dining workers belong to the same union as workers in other trades and are able to work year-round. Many on the picket lines were hoping for a similar agreement with Harvard.

    According to the MIT living wage calculator, $35,000 for a full-time worker translates to less than $17 an hour based on the 2080 hours in a year that characterizes full-time work. This is barely above the minimum living wage for one adult of $13.34 and below that for one adult, plus child, at $27.49.

    University spokesperson Tania DeLuzuriaga wrote in a statement that the union agreed to changes in retiree health benefits that “will make their insurance plan consistent with all of Harvard’s exempt employees and 5,000 members of other unions on campus.” It is unclear what these changes are.

    According to the Human Resources site, the 2016 costs for health insurance range between $91 and $135 for an individual and $246 and $364 for a family in the lowest tier, set at earnings of less than $70,000 a year. Harvard has said it will create a new premium contribution tier for employees who make less than $55,000 per year, in which the university will contribute 87 percent of the cost of the lowest-cost plan, but this won’t be implemented until 2019.

    As Harvard returns to business as usual, contract negotiations for dining hall workers at Northeastern University in Boston, also organizing in Local 26, are expected to begin soon. Janitors at nearby Tufts University voted Thursday to authorize a strike if a new contract agreement isn’t reached with the school’s maintenance contractor by October 31. Some 200 workers who clean the university voted unanimously for a strike.

    The janitors work for a building services provider for commercial and industrial properties, Newton-based C&W Services. According to Local 32BJ of the Services Employees International Union, which represents the workers, demands are similar to those raised in the HUDS strike—cost-of-living wage increases, opportunities for more full-time jobs and affordable health care benefits.

    Copyright © 1998-2016 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved
  15. #115
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    IUF News

    UK Employment Tribunal: 'self-employed' Uber drivers are workers, with rights

    Posted: 31 Oct 2016 06:36 AM PDT



    The London Employment Tribunal, in a decision with major implications for the 'gig economy', has ruled that Uber drivers are workers, not 'self-employed', and as workers they have enforceable rights, including a guaranteed minimum wage, paid breaks, and holiday pay. The decision came in response to two test cases brought on behalf of drivers by the IUF-affiliated GMB in June.

    You are subscribed to email updates from IUF News.
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States
  16. #116
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    What do Michael Kors, Target, & Military all have in Common?


    Dear Chris,

    My coworkers and I went on STRIKE last week to STOP wage theft and misclassification at the trucking and warehouse companies patronized by Michael Kors, Target, and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). These companies, the California Cartage family of companies and Intermodal Bridge Transport (IBT), are violating U.S. labor laws, in violation of Kors', Target’s, and the DOD’s codes of conduct, and we are fighting back.

    I need your help. Please sign our petition calling on Michael Kors, Target, and the U.S. Department of Defense to enforce their Codes of Conduct to assure that their port trucking and warehouse vendors are following the law. Every dollar paid to lawbreaking companies like Cal Cartage and IBT is sanctioning their persistent wage theft and misclassification.



    We are the port truck drivers and warehouse workers that makes sure these products arrive on time in good condition. And I’m angry that Michael Kors, Target, and the U.S. DOD don’t require more from the companies that they do business with to ensure that my job is safe and secure. Instead, my coworkers and I are misclassified port truck drivers and temporary warehouse workers instead of being given the benefits of full time permanent employees. Following an extensive investigation, Region 21 of the National Labor Relations Board has issued a complaint against IBT, alleging that it discharged and threatened employees for asserting their union rights under federal law.

    Can you sign our petition to Michael Kors, Target, and the U.S. Department of Defense today telling them to implement their Code of Conduct on the companies they use for trucking and warehousing?

    We thank you deeply for your support.

    Sincerely,

    Sergio Gonzalez
    Port Truck Driver
    California Cartage
    &
    Bruce Jefferson
    Warehouse Worker
    California Cartage

    Action Network
    Sent via Action Network, a free online toolset anyone can use to organize. Click here to sign up and get started building an email list and creating online actions today.
    Action Network is an open platform that empowers individuals and groups to organize for progressive causes. We encourage responsible activism, and do not support using the platform to take unlawful or other improper action. We do not control or endorse the conduct of users and make no representations of any kind about them.
    You can unsubscribe or update your email address by changing your subscription preferences here.
  17. #117
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Trump attacks the integrity of postal workers across the country


    Brothers and Sisters,

    Over the last weekend Donald Trump accused USPS employees of “throw[ing] away” mail-in election ballots. Without any substance or fact, he accused us of breaking our oath as postal workers. Click on the links for Trump’s full comments on Oct. 29th and Oct. 30th.

    I urge you not to take his comments lightly. He is willing to throw you and all workers under the bus for his own ego. Quite simply he does not value a public Postal Service and has no respect for the work of any postal employee.

    Trump does not support the rights of workers to have a voice in their workplace and to collectively bargain. Right now he is battling a Unite Here! organizing drive at one of his hotels in Las Vegas, NV.

    Who you vote for is a personal decision, but I urge you to remember his comments when you fill out your ballot in the next week.

    In Union Solidarity,

    Mark Dimondstein, President

    Action Network
    Sent via Action Network, a free online toolset anyone can use to organize. Click here to sign up and get started building an email list and creating online actions today.
    Action Network is an open platform that empowers individuals and groups to organize for progressive causes. We encourage responsible activism, and do not support using the platform to take unlawful or other improper action. We do not control or endorse the conduct of users and make no representations of any kind about them.
    You can unsubscribe or update your email address by changing your subscription preferences here.
  18. #118
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    Unions & Voters push back Right-to-Work! Join us at SHROCX, Jackson, Dec 9-11




    Despite the Election of Trump, Virginia Voters Reject Right-to-Work (for less) Constitutional Amendment!

    The election of Trump as President presents many challenges for workers, our unions, and the broader social justice movement. Trump has a long record of supporting the wealthy 1% at the expense of workers, and attacking Black, immigrant, Muslim, women, disabled and other oppressed people. He has refused to negotiate with newly organized hospitality workers at his Trump Towers, and they have filed NLRB charges against him. Over the coming weeks and months, we will need to continue to build our movement to fightback!

    Meanwhile, there were many positive signs at the polls last Tuesday:
    Colorado, Arizona, Maine and Washington state all voted to raise their statewide minimum wages to $12 per hour by 2020, Washington to $13.50. All states workers get $1 per year increase over next few years.


    Unions across Virginia built a broad movement to defeat the Right-to-work amendment there, very notably the role of the Virginia Education Association with thousands of members all across the state helped mobilize the "No" vote.



    Unions Defeat Right-To-Work Amendment In Virginia


    Dave Jamieson
    November 8, 2016
    Huffington Post

    Virginians voted down an amendment that would have established the states right-to-work status in the state constitution.

    In a bit of good news for labor unions, Virginians voted down a ballot initiative Tuesday that would have enshrined the state’s right-to-work status in the state constitution.

    Unions in Virginia campaigned hard against the proposal, which was supported by business groups and Republican lawmakers. Virginia has had a right-to-work law on the books for decades, but the ballot measure would have effectively made it permanent.

    Right-to-work laws forbid contracts between unions and employers that require all employees in a workplace to pay the union for bargaining on their behalf. Under U.S. labor law, unions have to represent all employees in a particular bargaining unit, even those who want nothing to do with a union. Unions say it’s only fair that everyone chip in to cover the costs of representation.

    In states with right-to-work laws, employees in unionized workplaces aren’t obligated to pay any fees to the union, allowing them to opt out completely. Conservatives refer to this as “workplace freedom,” but unions call it “free riding.” Whatever you want to call it, it’s been the reality in Virginia since 1947, when changes in federal law first allowed states to pursue right-to-work laws. It’s one reason union membership is so low in Virginia when compared with other states.

    But the prevailing state of affairs in Virginia wasn’t sufficient for backers of what was called Constitutional Amendment Question 1 on the ballot. If approved, the measure would have amended the state constitution so that Virginia could never not be a right-to-work state, save for another change to the constitution. Terry McAuliffe, the state’s Democratic governor, would not be able to veto it.

    Those who pushed the amendment claimed it would make Virginia more attractive to employers, who wouldn’t have to worry about the state repealing its right-to-work law (if they ever worried about that in the first place). Typifying this argument, the head of the Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce claimed that cementing right-to-work in the constitution would make Virginia a more “competitive and attractive place for business and job creation.”

    Backers of the amendment may have feared that, as Virginia creeps bluer and bluer, a Democratic-controlled statehouse could one day repeal its right-to-work status. But that seems unlikely. When he was Virginia’s Democratic governor, even Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton’s running mate, said the state’s right-to-work law was something he “strongly supports.” And once a state goes right-to-work, it tends to stay that way ― especially when it’s the long-standing tradition in a place like Virginia. Besides, right-to-work laws are now more popular than ever, to the great detriment of unions.

    It used to be that right-to-work laws were confined to the South and parts of the West. But in the past four and a half years, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and West Virginia have all gone right-to-work. After West Virginia passed its law in February, a majority of states ― 26 ― were right-to-work for the first time ever, making it the norm in the U.S.

    The fight in Virginia says a lot about where organized labor finds itself right now. With the help of state Republicans, business groups around the country have been pushing laws that restrict collective bargaining and deplete the labor movement. A case in point is Wisconsin, where in 2011, Republicans stripped most public sector workers of their bargaining rights. When these conservative groups succeed, unions lose out. When they fail, unions don’t make any gains.

    In the case of Virginia, unions there were able to mobilize and defeat a constitutional amendment that posed a threat to them. But all their victory accomplished was preserving the status quo.





    Join SWA at the Southern Human Rights Organizing Conference (SHROC) 20th Anniversary Conference

    Jackson, MS
    December 9-11

    Register Today!
    For more information: 662-334- 1122 or email [email protected]



    "SHROC is an important gathering of people from different movements." Sarah White, Board President of Mississippi Workers' Center For Human Rights.

    SHROC serves as an important link between US Southern human rights struggles and those in the Global South. The primary goal of SHROC is to identify innovative and practical methods of organizing across the region. Another important objective is to strengthen the capacity of civil rights and social justice organizations in the Deep South. This would enable these organizations to expand their programmatic work beyond civil rights and social justice campaigns to more effectively address international human rights issues.

    The reality of globalization demands that the US southern human rights struggle connects with struggles in other parts of the world. Through SHROC, activists and organizers will work together across the region to build an anti-racism movement that adheres to a human rights framework in its struggle toward justice.

    Everyone should be aware of their individual and collective human rights and have the capacity to defend them. SHROC uses a collaborative approach to fighting injustice by encouraging activists from the anti-racist, women’s rights, children’s rights, disability rights, and gay and transgender rights movements to come together as a unified force.

    "I've met people from all over the world at SHROC. I have learned about their struggles and what it means to be people who are not respected and not treated like human beings. And so I come to every conference so I can learn about the struggles of people of color from wherever they may come." Shelley Inniss, Retired Teacher.

    "SHROC reinforces the application of human rights standards and the use of international mechanisms in establishing a standard for human dignity. Also, it keeps the existence and the work of imprisoned political activists and human rights defenders in the minds of the people and on the agenda for liberation." Efia Nwangaza, Director of The Malcolm X Center for Self Determination.

    "As the founder of the very first SHROC convening, I am amazed at how the gathering has become an institution in our movement. It is hard to believe that we've been coming together for 18 years, bearing witness to struggles and victories. Raising our voices and making just demands for an end to all forms of slavery, discrimination, xenophobia and colonization. We are really a central point for solidarity and principled unity. May we continue for the next twenty years and beyond. " Jaribu Hill, Human Rights Defender.

    Make a donation to support the Southern Workers School!

    Copyright © 2016 Southern Workers Assembly, All rights reserved.
    You either attended an event hosted by the Southern Workers Assembly or have signed one of our online petitions.

    Our mailing address is:
    Southern Workers Assembly
    PO Box 934
    Rocky Mount, NC 27802

    Add us to your address book


    Want to change how you receive these emails?
    You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

    Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp
  19. #119
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    https://www.goiam.org/news/chicago-l...ct-pensions-2/


    Chicago Local 701 Auto Mechanics Strike to Protect Pensions

    IMAIL November 17, 2016

    Facebook

    TwitterYouTubeYouTubePinterestPinterestSaveInstagr am


    IAM Local 701 auto mechanics, along with volunteers, strike to protect their pensions at Roesch Ford and Roesch Ford Trucking Center in Bensenville, IL. Photo courtesy of Ryan Kelly of IAM Local 126.

    IAM Local 701 auto mechanics working at Roesch Ford and Roesch Ford Trucking Center in Bensenville, IL walked out on strike Thursday, November 10, 2016 when the employees voted not to accept the owner, Dan Roesch’s, offer of a 14-month “extension contract” providing the same terms as the contract which expired July 31st.

    “It wasn’t just the offer that had the employees upset,” said IAM Local 701 Business Representative Bill LePinske. “It was the statements made by the owner at the bargaining table that he intended to pull out of the Local 701 Defined Benefit Pension Plan upon the expiration of the 14-month contract.”

    There is some history of Roesch coming after his mechanics’ contract, says LePinske. Prior to this last agreement, the dealership was covered under the industry standard contract, the Standard Automotive Agreement (SAA). Roesch purchased what was then Elmhurst Ford. During the purchase Roesch had the right to negotiate a new bargaining agreement and he took advantage of the economic downturn and high unemployment to gut the workers’ agreement.

    “Among the worse provisions of the previous agreement was a move to ‘seniority by productivity,’ a change which effectively cost the workers their seniority, as work flow and productivity can easily be manipulated by management,” said LePinske. “Seniority provisions are intended to protect workers who have been with an employer from lay-off based on their date of hire. Naturally as mechanics age, their productivity tends to go down. In a ‘seniority by productivity’ situation, the employer could lay off the employee who has been in service the longest as they slow due to the effects of aging.

    In addition to the pension problem and the seniority language, high health insurance premium co-pays were other issues the IAM brought to the table that the employer was unwilling to discuss.

    “We are not going to allow Roesch to further gut our contract or let him set the table to take away our pensions in 14 months,” said bargaining unit member Brian Ilic. “My brothers and I will continue to strike until Roesch comes to his senses.”

    With the expiration of the SAA on the horizon in August 2017, Local 701 Directing Business Representative Sam Cicinelli and the rest of the business representatives are not interested in moving local membership backwards.

    “The Standard Automotive Agreement covers nearly 1,200 of our members at hundreds of other Local 701 represented dealerships and we are not going to allow a substandard contract at Roesch Ford to lower the bar for the rest of our membership,” said Cicinelli. “In the words of our new International President Robert Martinez Jr., we’re going to put the fight back into the Fighting Machinists!”

    “IAM members at Roesch Ford and the Roesch Ford Trucking Center are among the most highly-skilled and talented mechanics in the auto industry, said IAM Midwest Territory General Vice President Philip J. Gruber. “We cannot let one-sided negotiations aimed at gutting our members’ rights to retire with dignity continue. We have to fight. As Local 701 members walk the picket line today, we want them to know that we’re standing with them in solidarity. We are with them in their fight for a secure future.”

    It should be noted that the Mechanics at Roesch Volkswagen are not on strike – only the mechanics at Roesch Ford and the Roesch Ford Truck Center are on strike. Members and supporters are encouraged to stop by the strike line to show their solidarity. Roesch Ford is located at 333 W. Grand Ave. in Bensenville, IL.

    RELATED ARTICLES

    Chicago Local 701 Auto Mechanics Strike To Protect Pensions

    READ MORE
    Registration Deadline For 2017 EAP I Class Approaches

    READ MORE
    Tuition Can Be A Burden – Apply For An IAM Scholarship To Help

    READ MORE
    MOST POPULAR NEWS / ARTICLES

    District 10 Wins Big At Crown Cork And Seal

    READ MORE
    Help Protect Airline Customer Service Representatives From Assault

    READ MORE
    Your Vote Matters. Really, It Does.

    READ MORE
    Stop TPP: Pick Up The Phone On Sept. 14

    READ MORE
    MOST RECENT NEWS / ARTICLES

    Chicago Local 701 Auto Mechanics Strike To Protect Pensions

    READ MORE
    Registration Deadline For 2017 EAP I Class Approaches

    READ MORE
    Tuition Can Be A Burden – Apply For An IAM Scholarship To Help

    READ MORE
    Get IAM MOBILE 3.0
    IAM Mobile 3.0 offers more features and functions to read and share information about our union and the important issues we face as working families. This app combines all of the IAM's popular online functions such as the IAM Journal, the Machinists News Network on demand video service, the IAM webpage GOiam.org, iMail, an IAM Photo Gallery, the IAM Facebook Page, and lots more -- all in one easy-to-access App for tablets and smartphones.

    SOCIAL WALL JOIN THE IAM CONTACT US HISTORY / TIMELINE IMAIL SIGNUP PRESS RELEASES EVENTS CALENDAR RESOURCES MEMBER RIGHTS IAM STORE TRUST FUND PENSION FUND IAM RSS FEEDS WWW CENTER IAM JOURNAL
    Union Member Rights and Officer Responsibilities Under the LMRDA The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) guarantees certain rights to union members and imposes certain responsibilities on union officers. MORE
    Privacy & Policies Sitemap © 2016 IAMAW
  20. #120
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    What Verizon doesn't want you to know about the Philippines





    Workers taking calls for Verizon in the Philippines are being stiffed on their wages. Tell Verizon to stop turning a blind eye and make sure workers are paid what they earned.

    SIGN THE PETITION ►

    Chris,

    Verizon likes to pad its huge profit margins by sending work overseas to places like the Philippines where wages are meager. Now, the company is doing nothing to make sure some of those workers are even paid their full wages.

    During this year's Verizon strike, workers in the Philippines reached out to workers on strike in the United States to show their support. A group of us - three striking Verizon workers from New York - had the incredible opportunity to visit the Philippines to see the extent of Verizon's offshoring and meet with the workers there.

    Filipino workers joined us on a picket line outside the call center where Verizon was forcing workers to work overtime taking calls during the strike. We were pretty shocked at what happened next - Verizon security wearing masks and holding long rifles confronted us. Clearly, the company didn't want us to see what was going on.

    Now the same workers who showed us so much solidarity during the strike need our help.

    Management at Tech Mahindra - a contractor that manages Verizon's call centers in the Philippines - is refusing to pay workers the correct amount of wages and overtime pay that they earned. They were also late in payment of both base wages and incentive pay. 50 workers in Cebu, Philippines have even been suspended or fired after taking action to demand the company pay them what they have earned.

    Will you add your name to the petition demanding Verizon take action and make sure the workers are paid the wages they earned?

    SIGN THE PETITION ►

    It's outrageous that Verizon is turning a blind eye to the exploitation taking place in overseas call centers where workers take calls from their customers.

    Verizon doesn't want the public to know what has happened to the good union jobs they've shipped to the Philippines where workers are paid less than $2 an hour, but thanks to the solidarity of workers in the Philippines, we helped spread the word to expose their bad behavior.

    It's time to help workers in the Philippines. Please add your name in support.

    In solidarity,

    Simone Kellyman
    Verizon Customer Service Rep, CWA Local 1400


    P.S. If you'd like to hear more about our trip, please watch and share our video by clicking here.

    Stand Up to Verizon
    standuptoverizon.com

    Facebook Twitter

    Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC.
    501 3rd Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001

    Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from Stand Up to Verizon, please click here.

Similar Threads

  1. Libya Newsfeed
    By Sentinel in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 452
    Last Post: 8th March 2012, 08:28
  2. Bahrain Newsfeed
    By scarletghoul in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 23rd June 2011, 06:24
  3. Yemen Newsfeed
    By Rusty Shackleford in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 15th June 2011, 06:06
  4. Tunisia Newsfeed
    By ComradeAV in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 2nd May 2011, 04:26
  5. Here comes Libya! -- Libya newsfeed
    By Fulanito de Tal in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 508
    Last Post: 24th February 2011, 16:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread