Thread: AMERICAN AID

Results 1 to 20 of 21

  1. #1
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Occupied England
    Posts 379
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    well the U.S and their *****es r sending aid after 3 weeks of not,and they sent 400 tonnes when the afghan people need 580,000 tonees to avoid mass starvation,and when the war kicks in like hell the aid will get through,maybe they can send food tied to the noses of cruise missiles
    \'\'What passing bells for those who die as cattle.Only a monsterous anger of the guns\'\'-Wilfred Owen--------------------\'\'Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and to give an appearane of soliditry to wind\'\'-Geor
  2. #2
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Arkansas, usa
    Posts 164
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    (speaking sarcastically) I am ashamed of you! With all these media people watching our every move, you think that the US would do something just to get a pat on the back?
    sorry, couldn't resist.
    Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country. Ask what you can do for one another.
  3. #3
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 32
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The U.S. has been sending more food aid than any other country since before the Sept. 11 attacks.
  4. #4
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Arkansas, usa
    Posts 164
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    I don't doubt that. If the US really wants to make a grand gesture they can send food and clean water to Iraq.
    Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country. Ask what you can do for one another.
  5. #5
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location US
    Posts 390
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    actually i've heard that compared to the countries' economy and wealth, the u.s. is not no.1 in humanitarian aide. i don't know how true that is though...
    \"One murder makes a villain...millions a hero. Numbers sanctify, my friend.\" -Charlie Chaplin
  6. #6
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Arkansas, usa
    Posts 164
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    But you must remember PCE that Americans don't tend to look at things comparitively when being compared to what other cultures are doing. We send over a 1/10000th of our ability in AID and it may equal 100,000 tons. Another country sends over 100 percent of what they can and it may only be 1000 tons. We of course are better because we sacrificed more. Just ask any of these Republican pin-heads.

    And for Reagan Lives- Please think about this. If you want to listen to and use a comedian as an intellectual. Try using an intellectual comedian. Try George Carlin. He may be an a**hole but he is very intelligent.
    Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country. Ask what you can do for one another.
  7. #7
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 32
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I see, so if the U.S. isn't #1 in sending food aid, then they're heartless a**holes. They have to send the MOST aid, relatively or outright, otherwise their help isn't worthwile or genuine. Meantime, other countries, that haven't sent sh*t, get a free pass from your criticism because the U.S. hasn't sent the MOST. That's a pretty fair standard of judgement. It doesn't make it look like your objective reasoning is biased AT ALL. You have the same standard for all, hmm? How about the wealthy Arab countries like Saudi Arabia. What have they sent? According to the people on this board, the U.S. is worthy of much criticism. Feeble attempts to bash the U.S. for something good it attempts to do does not strengthen your arguments against it. Pick the fights you can win.
  8. #8
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Arkansas, usa
    Posts 164
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    ou seem to have a serious problem understanding what I saiy so let me explain. If each country that sent aid sent the same percentage based on their available resources it would be more meaningful. Is that a little more clear for you? Need I go farther? I thought it was pretty self-explainatory the first time.
    Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country. Ask what you can do for one another.
  9. #9
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Havana,Cuba
    Posts 42
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Lets remember who sponsored Thalibs when they fought with Soviet Union
    new Russia don't want to help Cuba,this sucks
    Viva la Republica de Cuba!
    Viva Union de Republica sovieticas Socialistas!!!
  10. #10
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location Who knows?
    Posts 27
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I don't care the how much they sent or how but man, was that propaganda or not?

    I saw on primetime CNN Pakistani people carrying bags of wheat with a big fucking USA in color printed on them. They walked and smile generously to the camera.

    Fuck Nike or GAP, the new cool brand is USA.

    USA! USA! USA!
  11. #11
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location Long Island, NY (U$A)
    Posts 4,168
    Organisation
    I.W.W.
    Rep Power 22

    Default

    Paaaah... more flag waving and usa chants...

    But yea we are dropping food and bombs today in Afghanistain... but when they talk about bombs they say it's limited strikes... just fifty missles or whatever... but then they talk about air dropping food... they just say, " We're air dropping food"! Please... think for yourself!
    In Solidarity,
    RC
  12. #12
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location U.S.
    Posts 106
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    >... but when they talk about bombs they say it's limited strikes... >just fifty missles or whatever... but then they talk about air >dropping food... they just say, " We're air dropping food"! >Please... think for yourself!



    Say what?
  13. #13
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 32
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The U.S. is implementing a $320,000,000 food aid package, on top of the aid they've always given Afghanistan. The strikes are intended for military targets and the system that supports the terrorists, in retaliation and to prevent further terrorist attacks. The terrorist network slaughtered over 6,000 civilians. What exactly is the problem?
  14. #14
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location U.S.
    Posts 106
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    I'm hearing from the news and madmax that we are hitting military targets but I'm reading here that we are hitting civillian targets...... which is right?
  15. #15
    Join Date Feb 2003
    Location canada
    Posts 2,173
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    This thread just seems to be revealing the anti-US sentiment of the forum. It appears that in your eyes america can do no right. Ofcourse you are entitled to your own opinions, but if that is the case rather than deny the charges when they are brought up people should just fess up. It seems that even when we explicitly try to help (I say explicitly because we are always implicitly helping) your cynicism doesn't allow you to see the good intentions.
    Che Guevara wannabe
  16. #16
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 32
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The normal way to pass judgement -
    Step 1: observe action
    Step 2: analyze action
    Step 3: make conclusion
    Step 4: pass judgement

    The way many on this forum pass judgement -
    Step 1: make conclusion
    Step 2: observe action
    Step 3: interpret action to fit conclusion already made in step 1.
    Step 4: pass judgement.
  17. #17
    Join Date Sep 2001
    Location Arkansas, usa
    Posts 164
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    The food we are dropping are daily ration packs. Vegetarian packs. I don't know how many here have ever used those rations, but they are not that filling. And it would take a hell of a lot of them to make a difference. Most of the people in the outskirts of Afghanistan don't even know what the world Trade Center was, much less that it was attacked. All they know is that the US is suddenly dropping bombs and shooting missiles on them. What do you think that is going to make them feel? Food and bombs? Come on. And as for your comment about judgement, it sounds like you are pretty good in that department yourself. You are judging the people on this board and haven't been here long enough to know what your talking about. Yes, some are anti-american. They have a history of reasons to back that up. They have a right. Others are anti-capitalism. They have that right. As for myself. I am 1/4 Mohawk/Cherokee. I think I have a damn good reason to be pissed off at this government. Not to mention the above stated reasons.

    (Edited by ViktorPravda at 2:43 pm on Oct. 8, 2001)
    Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country. Ask what you can do for one another.
  18. #18
    Join Date Feb 2003
    Location canada
    Posts 2,173
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Oh yeah,they failed to mention that not only is the US not really supplying the afgans enough and also choosing the least effective way (trucks are more effective than planes) but doesnt anyone know that afganistan is pretty much covered with landmines? And guess where they are dropping the aid,in areas saturated with land mines, talk about "retaliation" heh
    Che Guevara wannabe
  19. #19
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location Vancouver Canada
    Posts 936
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Quote: from MetalGus on 10:29 pm on Oct. 6, 2001
    I don't care the how much they sent or how but man, was that propaganda or not?

    I saw on primetime CNN Pakistani people carrying bags of wheat with a big fucking USA in color printed on them. They walked and smile generously to the camera.

    Fuck Nike or GAP, the new cool brand is USA.

    USA! USA! USA!
    that's typical of almost anyone. i'm sure canada does the same thing with thier relief aid.
    I AM THE PERFECT ME!
    Economic Left/Right: -7.25
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
  20. #20
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location Vancouver Canada
    Posts 936
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Quote: from madmax on 5:57 am on Oct. 8, 2001

    The U.S. is implementing a $320,000,000 food aid package, on top of the aid they've always given Afghanistan. The strikes are intended for military targets and the system that supports the terrorists, in retaliation and to prevent further terrorist attacks. The terrorist network slaughtered over 6,000 civilians. What exactly is the problem?
    the problem is that revenge is not the solution. yes what was done to the wtc was absolutely horrific and I definately feel the direct result of it up here in canada's capital. however, why the us is targeting military targets inevitably there will be civilian casualities (i posted a thing about international humanitarian law and military tactics somewhere in this forum which explains what i mean). anyway i digress. the loss of more innocent civilians (and yes many afghanistans are innocent) is not the way to go about remembering those that died in the WTC attacks.
    I AM THE PERFECT ME!
    Economic Left/Right: -7.25
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15

Similar Threads

  1. American, Anti-American
    By KC in forum Theory
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 16th July 2007, 14:41
  2. American Terrorists? - American diplomacy at it's finest
    By Moondog in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 26th March 2003, 23:32
  3. I'm an American tired of American lies
    By Kodzoquo in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th October 2002, 14:44
  4. Woody Harrelson: "I'm an American tired of American lies"
    By Conghaileach in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18th October 2002, 11:18
  5. THE AMERICAN TERRORISM - the american brutality
    By Guest in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 24th September 2001, 16:39

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread