Thread: "Useless" natural science

Results 21 to 22 of 22

  1. #21
    Join Date Aug 2010
    Location new york
    Posts 1,210
    Organisation
    Workers International League
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The issue with judging certain scientific pursuits and trying to ascertain their relevance to the physical word is that not everyone is an expert in every variant of science. And even then, more often than not the potential use of scientific advancement is not always readily apparent. Quite simply put, it is not a field where you can weed out aspects of it as useless, as possible uses are not always obvious.
  2. #22
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 10,392
    Rep Power 188

    Default

    what's wrong with knowledge for the sake of knowledge? i think in a communist society there would be enough time, resources and people to work on all of the "socially necessary" sciences and study things that may not have immediate or even any "social value"
    'heavens above, how awful it is to live outside the law - one is always expecting what one rightly deserves.'
    petronius, the satyricon

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30th July 2010, 05:27
  2. Israel's "natural growth" argument debunked
    By Guerrilla22 in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th June 2009, 08:45
  3. James O'Connor's "Natural Causes"
    By Sendo in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26th August 2008, 00:00
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd April 2008, 07:40
  5. Is a sphere the "natural" shape?
    By Entrails Konfetti in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 31st July 2007, 01:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread