Thread: Teenage forced to apoligize to church after being raped

Results 1 to 20 of 22

  1. #1
    Join Date Dec 2010
    Location South Carolina
    Posts 488
    Organisation
    U.S. Army
    Rep Power 0

    Default Teenage forced to apoligize to church after being raped

    http://womensrights.change.org/blog/...or_being_raped

    In 1997, 15-year-old Tina Anderson became pregnant after being raped repeatedly by an older man she knew from church. Shockingly, when her pastor found out, he forced her to apologize in front of the entire congregation in Concord, New Hampshire, and then promptly helped whisk her away to live in Colorado.
    According to Tina, the first time she was raped by Ernest Willis, it was in the backseat of car after he'd given her a driving lesson. She didn't tell anyone because she was terrified that she'd be blamed. After being raped by Willis again, Tina became pregnant. Willis, ever the vile human-being, offered to drive her out-of-state for an abortion or to punch her in the stomach to cause a miscarriage. It was at this point that Tina confided in her mother, who in turn notified their pastor, Chuck Phelps.
    It turns out, she was right was right to fear being blamed. In a disgusting turn of events, Phelps told Tina she would have to go before the entire congregation to apologize for her sins. Excuse me? It seems that Phelps explained to Tina that while Willis "may have been 99 percent responsible," she need to confess to her "1 percent guilt in the situation."
    After Tina acquiesced in this humiliating act of victim-blaming, the church and her family shipped her off to live in Colorado against her wishes, where she was instructed to give the baby up for adoption. While Phelps did contact the police about Willis you know, since he was 99% guilty and all it became nearly impossible for them to do anything about it since Tina was now hidden away in Colorado.

    This appalling story is finally seeing the light of day because Tina Anderson decided to come forward this year. Sadly, it wasn't until this February that Tina truly realized that the assault on her was, in fact, zero percent her responsibility. That's when she decided it was time to share her experience with others and to seek justice for what had happened to her as a teenager.
    You might have noticed that I am using her real name, something highly unusual in rape cases because victims' names are protected. This is because Tina wanted it this way. She wanted you to know exactly who she is and what was done to her, not only by Ernest Willis, but by those she entrusted to protect her.
    Since Tina came forward, Willis has been arrested and released on bail. (In New Hampshire, in cases of sexual assault of a minor, the statute of limitations does not run out until 22 years after the victim turns 18). Just as importantly, police are investigating exactly how much church leaders knew about the rape. Of course, if the adults in Concord meaning Phelps, Tina's family, and every church congregant who heard Tina's "confession" and sat silent had acted compassionately and responsibly back in 1997, they would have saved Tina over a decade of heartache and their community a lifetime of guilt.
    Glad she decided to stand up for herself even after this traumatic event occured.
  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to psgchisolm For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location we go hard
    Posts 2,871
    Organisation
    What Would Papa John Do?
    Rep Power 38

    Default

    Why the hell is there any statue of limitations on sex crimes?

    Than again, she must have been wearing some very revealing clothing and flirting with Willis a lot to the point that he just couldn't resist, I can totally see how this is partially her fault.
    You seem neat, but...

    They divide us by our color, they divide us by our tongue,
    They divide us men and women, they divide us old and young,
    But they'll tremble at our voices when they hear these verses sung,
    For the Union makes us strong!
  4. #3
    Join Date Jun 2003
    Location Western North Cack
    Posts 2,502
    Organisation
    Lorena Bobbit Fan Club
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    Why the hell is there any statue of limitations on sex crimes?
    I was about to hit the thank option...

    ... Then you said this:

    Than again, she must have been wearing some very revealing clothing and flirting with Willis a lot to the point that he just couldn't resist, I can totally see how this is partially her fault.
    Revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, etc. does not and should not ever be used to put fault on the victim. I was raped by someone I had previously been seeing. Are you going to blame me.

    The fact remains that revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, even making out does not validate or legitimize nonconsentual acts.
    I dreamt of a flower that was so beautiful that when it whithered away and died a tear left my eye. I saw our births, our lives and our deaths. I felt fire paint me with pain and I felt a kiss on my lips with a knife in my neck. Love to heartbreak to self-destruction to birth and to finally learning to frolic back into the same trap with a warm smile.

    O|O

    My blog: The Riot Slut Rage
  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bad Grrrl Agro For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date Jun 2003
    Location Western North Cack
    Posts 2,502
    Organisation
    Lorena Bobbit Fan Club
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    Glad she decided to stand up for herself even after this traumatic event occured.
    I wish I had stood up for myself.
    I dreamt of a flower that was so beautiful that when it whithered away and died a tear left my eye. I saw our births, our lives and our deaths. I felt fire paint me with pain and I felt a kiss on my lips with a knife in my neck. Love to heartbreak to self-destruction to birth and to finally learning to frolic back into the same trap with a warm smile.

    O|O

    My blog: The Riot Slut Rage
  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bad Grrrl Agro For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    More misogynistic chauvinism and backwards sexism from the church...

    Also EX, I'm pretty sure Fawkes was being sarcastic with his last line.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  9. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Decolonize The Left For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date Jun 2003
    Location Western North Cack
    Posts 2,502
    Organisation
    Lorena Bobbit Fan Club
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    More misogynistic chauvinism and backwards sexism from the church...
    True.

    Also EX, I'm pretty sure Fawkes was being sarcastic with his last line.
    I hope he was.
    I dreamt of a flower that was so beautiful that when it whithered away and died a tear left my eye. I saw our births, our lives and our deaths. I felt fire paint me with pain and I felt a kiss on my lips with a knife in my neck. Love to heartbreak to self-destruction to birth and to finally learning to frolic back into the same trap with a warm smile.

    O|O

    My blog: The Riot Slut Rage
  11. #7
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    Fawkes was both obviously being sarcastic and obviously being (unintentionally) insensitive: we all know the cliche about blaming victims in revealing clothing - I am sure that Fawkes was entirely well intentioned about it and saw that particular form of sarcasm as a way to participate in condemning victim-blamers, by mocking them...but its still good to recognize what a sensitive topic this is and how triggering comments can be even when they are obvious parodies...

    In any case, obviously this is a horrible example of how ridiculously bad reactionary churches can be/are...but there is also a risk that focusing on the extreme outliers like this one can normalize the far more typical hostility towards teenage sexuality and its association with "sin."
  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TC For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date Oct 2008
    Posts 4,026
    Organisation
    dildo factory workers local 127
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I was about to hit the thank option...

    ... Then you said this:

    Revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, etc. does not and should not ever be used to put fault on the victim. I was raped by someone I had previously been seeing. Are you going to blame me.

    The fact remains that revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, even making out does not validate or legitimize nonconsentual acts.
    He was very obviously being sarcastic.

    Fawkes was both obviously being sarcastic and obviously being (unintentionally) insensitive: we all know the cliche about blaming victims in revealing clothing - I am sure that Fawkes was entirely well intentioned about it and saw that particular form of sarcasm as a way to participate in condemning victim-blamers, by mocking them...but its still good to recognize what a sensitive topic this is and how triggering comments can be even when they are obvious parodies...
    Sarcasm can often be one of the harshest forms of ridicule, I see no insensitivity. If a racist makes a statement about immigrants, is it insensitive to immigrants to maliciously mock what they just said through sarcasm back to them? No, of course it's not.

    Anywho, this is outrageous.
  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to gorillafuck For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Join Date Jun 2010
    Location Virginia, USA
    Posts 274
    Organisation
    unaffiliated
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    "The only church that illuminates is a burning church." -Durruti
    Sic Semper Tyrannis
  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Burn A Flag For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Location Oklahoma, USA
    Posts 316
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    This is what happens when the notion of morality becomes divorced from material reality and the safeguarding of the rights of actual human beings.
    He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.
    -Nietzsche
  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Diello For This Useful Post:


  19. #11
    Join Date Jun 2010
    Location Helltown, Canada
    Posts 146
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    I'd hate to derail the topic but what can be done in a communist society to prevent mob rule for taking effect. I know I'm not the only one that feels like they want to hunt down these "god fearin'" Christians and make them confess there sins while their being hung with there own intestines.

    Awful story to say the least.
    "I get sick... not because of drink [but because] I am forced to listen to the ranting of my honorable opponent." -John A. MacDonald

    Economic Left/Right: -9.00
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.68
  20. #12
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location we go hard
    Posts 2,871
    Organisation
    What Would Papa John Do?
    Rep Power 38

    Default

    I was about to hit the thank option...

    ... Then you said this:

    Revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, etc. does not and should not ever be used to put fault on the victim. I was raped by someone I had previously been seeing. Are you going to blame me.

    The fact remains that revealing clothing, flirtatious behavior, even making out does not validate or legitimize nonconsentual acts.
    This:
    Sarcasm can often be one of the harshest forms of ridicule, I see no insensitivity. If a racist makes a statement about immigrants, is it insensitive to immigrants to maliciously mock what they just said through sarcasm back to them? No, of course it's not.
    Believe me, I have the utmost sympathy for you, I figured the sarcasm was pretty thinly veiled.
    You seem neat, but...

    They divide us by our color, they divide us by our tongue,
    They divide us men and women, they divide us old and young,
    But they'll tremble at our voices when they hear these verses sung,
    For the Union makes us strong!
  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Fawkes For This Useful Post:


  22. #13
    Join Date Dec 2010
    Location South Carolina
    Posts 488
    Organisation
    U.S. Army
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    "The only church that illuminates is a burning church." -Durruti
    "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."- Mohandas Ghandi


    Anywho, this is outrageous.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...raped-her.html

    I doubt these are the only outrageous ones.
    Last edited by psgchisolm; 12th January 2011 at 04:13.
  23. #14
    Join Date Sep 2003
    Location Behind the curtain
    Posts 11,767
    Rep Power 147

    Default

    This:


    Believe me, I have the utmost sympathy for you, I figured the sarcasm was pretty thinly veiled.
    Those annoying little smiley faces like this one ( ) would clear that up next time, then there wouldnt be a question of your intentions. FYI
    By having no family … I inherited the family of humanity.
    By having no possessions … I have possessed all.
    By rejecting the love of one … I received the love of all.
    By surrendering my life to the revolution … I found eternal life.
    “Revolutionary Suicide”
    -Huey P. Newton
  24. #15
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location we go hard
    Posts 2,871
    Organisation
    What Would Papa John Do?
    Rep Power 38

    Default

    Those annoying little smiley faces like this one ( ) would clear that up next time, then there wouldnt be a question of your intentions. FYI
    I figured the italics on "totally" would have sufficiently got the point across, but oh well, I'll throw in an emoticon next time.

    I'm sorry to hear that people may have been offended by what I said, but it's a wee bit of a stretch to say that what I said was insensitive to anyone other than rapists and their apologists.
    You seem neat, but...

    They divide us by our color, they divide us by our tongue,
    They divide us men and women, they divide us old and young,
    But they'll tremble at our voices when they hear these verses sung,
    For the Union makes us strong!
  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fawkes For This Useful Post:


  26. #16
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    I didn't take any offense at all - I don't think it was offensive - I think there was just a disconnect between what you were trying to do and how EX took it.

    However it is by definition insensitive to not be sensitive to the potential sensitivities of people reading what you write. I'm not saying you did anything wrong - as was I think totally clear in my post, I certainly understood you were being sarcastic and well intentioned and even in what Zeekloid quoted - made it clear that you were totally innocent for trying to mock victim-blamers...

    But not every type of politically legitimate and justifiable critique or mocking takes everyone's feelings and experience into account. Sometimes things we say have an unintended triggering effect - they evoke negative thoughts, feelings and associations. It seems they may have done that in EX in this case. So when there are highly sensitive topics, sometimes it is just nice as a courtesy to try tread lightly and take them seriously not because its wrong to do otherwise but because it can sometimes elicit an unwanted reaction in people who are sensitive to it. That's what I meant about showing sensitivity. Its not a big deal its just something to keep in mind when you can.
  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TC For This Useful Post:


  28. #17
    The apathetic leftist Committed User
    Join Date Aug 2006
    Location Florida or Puerto Rico
    Posts 3,233
    Organisation
    Sympathizer of: IWW, NEFAC, AFED, RAAN
    Rep Power 42

    Default

    wtf, New Hampshire.

    This shit is wrong, just wrong.
    "My heart sings for you both. Imagine it singing. la la la la."- Hannah Kay

    "if you keep calling average working people idiots i am sure they will be more apt to listen to what you have to say. "-bcbm

    "Sometimes false consciousness can be more destructive than apathy, just like how sometimes, doing nothing is actually better than doing the wrong thing."- Robocommie

    "The ruling class would tremble, and the revolution would be all but assured." -Explosive Situation, on the Revleft Merry Prankster bus
  29. #18
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location we go hard
    Posts 2,871
    Organisation
    What Would Papa John Do?
    Rep Power 38

    Default

    Alright, I know I'm probably going to come across as a combative prick whose trying to make an argument where there is none, but I'm just gonna try to clear up a few things from my perspective. Obviously someone's misinterpretation of what I said struck a nerve and I am sorry that that happened. However, this happens to all of us on a pretty regular basis, it's impossible for any of us to take everyone's feelings and experiences into account. Things that we say are inevitably going to be misinterpreted, taken out of context, etc., and have unintended effects. Of course we should tread more lightly when dealing with particularly sensitive topics -- and I think I did so here --, but I don't think that means we should cut out a pretty effective style of argument and analysis just because of its predisposition toward misinterpretation (a bunch of people saying "damn those bastards" isn't too effective at debasing the "logic" of victim blaming). I'm not at all blaming Esperanza for not immediately noticing the sarcasm in what I was saying and I am sorry that she was offended by it. Likewise, I'm not trying to start some argument just for the sake of starting an argument even if it seems like I'm beating a dead horse, I'm just trying to clarify some things from the way I see it. Yes, we should be careful when dealing with topics that are more serious than most, but we cannot expect to not encounter things such as this when anything beyond the simplest language is used, regardless of our level of sensitivity or seriousness.
    You seem neat, but...

    They divide us by our color, they divide us by our tongue,
    They divide us men and women, they divide us old and young,
    But they'll tremble at our voices when they hear these verses sung,
    For the Union makes us strong!
  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fawkes For This Useful Post:


  31. #19
    Join Date Jun 2003
    Location Western North Cack
    Posts 2,502
    Organisation
    Lorena Bobbit Fan Club
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    Alright, I know I'm probably going to come across as a combative prick whose trying to make an argument where there is none, but I'm just gonna try to clear up a few things from my perspective. Obviously someone's misinterpretation of what I said struck a nerve and I am sorry that that happened. However, this happens to all of us on a pretty regular basis, it's impossible for any of us to take everyone's feelings and experiences into account. Things that we say are inevitably going to be misinterpreted, taken out of context, etc., and have unintended effects. Of course we should tread more lightly when dealing with particularly sensitive topics -- and I think I did so here --, but I don't think that means we should cut out a pretty effective style of argument and analysis just because of its predisposition toward misinterpretation (a bunch of people saying "damn those bastards" isn't too effective at debasing the "logic" of victim blaming). I'm not at all blaming Esperanza for not immediately noticing the sarcasm in what I was saying and I am sorry that she was offended by it. Likewise, I'm not trying to start some argument just for the sake of starting an argument even if it seems like I'm beating a dead horse, I'm just trying to clarify some things from the way I see it. Yes, we should be careful when dealing with topics that are more serious than most, but we cannot expect to not encounter things such as this when anything beyond the simplest language is used, regardless of our level of sensitivity or seriousness.
    It's fine, I guess I'm just hypersensitive because I've had lots of nightmares about it lately. It's causing me to be more emotional than usual.
    I dreamt of a flower that was so beautiful that when it whithered away and died a tear left my eye. I saw our births, our lives and our deaths. I felt fire paint me with pain and I felt a kiss on my lips with a knife in my neck. Love to heartbreak to self-destruction to birth and to finally learning to frolic back into the same trap with a warm smile.

    O|O

    My blog: The Riot Slut Rage
  32. #20
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    It's cool. The internet is a tough medium to convey emotions/feelings through, so we have stupid icons and stuff to help. The best option is just to talk through it like the two of you have done here - every problem of the forum is usually the result of mis-communication anyway.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  33. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Decolonize The Left For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. " When You're Forced to Cheer for the Man Who Raped You"
    By Salyut in forum Womens' Struggle
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 3rd August 2011, 03:59
  2. 90% Drop in Church Attendance to Church of England
    By Pawn Power in forum Religion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19th January 2009, 17:30
  3. Bob Marley raped me...
    By canikickit in forum Cultural
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 9th April 2004, 05:06

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread