Thread: Religion in a communist society

Results 41 to 48 of 48

  1. #41
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Location Illinois, USA
    Posts 2,708
    Rep Power 57

    Default



    All up in that anti-intellectualism
  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Robocommie For This Useful Post:


  3. #42
    Join Date Mar 2010
    Location London, United Kingdom
    Posts 3,883
    Organisation
    Currently none, but critically support various organisations and parties
    Rep Power 47

    Default

    Because they all lack a dimension of material analysis. For ex: blaming religion for conflicts based on resources and the will of capital. Most militant atheists of the Dawkins/Hitchens stripe probably aren't Marxists for the simple fact that they've basically discarded any sort of Base-Superstructure analysis, instead focusing on a sort of strange idealism and Dawkins going on about "poisonous memes" and other bullshit.

    Most of them are also basically fronts for racist, anti-Islamic scaretalk.
    Intellectually Marxists don't agree with Dawkins-style analysis of religion of course, but as I said before, as a Marxist I'm certainly not going to spend time actually defending religion from people like Dawkins, including religions like Islam.

    Marxism is neither anti-theism nor anti-anti-theism.
    [FONT=System]Long Live Proletarian Democracy!

    Down with All Imperialisms!
    [/FONT]
  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Queercommie Girl For This Useful Post:


  5. #43
    Join Date Apr 2010
    Location la frontera
    Posts 2,243
    Rep Power 0

    Default



    the book he's holding?

    The Secret
  6. #44
    Join Date Apr 2010
    Location la frontera
    Posts 2,243
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Intellectually Marxists don't agree with Dawkins-style analysis of religion of course, but as I said before, as a Marxist I'm certainly not going to spend time actually defending religion from people like Dawkins, including religions like Islam.

    Marxism is neither anti-theism nor anti-anti-theism.
    Yeah, of course not. I wouldn't expect my comrades to defend my religious beliefs. I mean...I'd enjoy not being executed summarily for em, but I'm not expecting back up from you guys.

    The problem is that most of Dawkin/Hitchen's criticisms do come from a severely non-Marxist place in terms of not taking a material criticism of Religion. i.e. Religion is constructed in response to material conditions. Rather, they see religion itself as causative in creating material conditions.
  7. #45
    Join Date Oct 2010
    Location Northwest US
    Posts 6
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Not sure what this means.

    E: Neopaganism - Way more intellectual than your summae theologica/rabbinical scholars/imams.
    To say that my own religion tends to lack an anti-intellectual streak is not the same thing as to claim that it is intellectual. Merely that its adherents are not steered away from their own intellectual inquiries and directions.

    The thoroughly intellectual traditions of the Catholicism and Talmudic studies were not very welcoming of independant intellectual inquiry and directions.
  8. #46
    Join Date Oct 2010
    Location Northwest US
    Posts 6
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Seems to me the Catholic Church was pretty damn anti-intellectual if your intellectual pursuits didn't lead you to the same conclusions as those of the Doctors of the Church. Same with the intellectual traditions of the other major religions. Orthodox Judaism, despite its incredible legal/logical Talmudic traditions is pretty damn anti-intellectual if you wished to study secular intellectual topics.
  9. #47
    Join Date Jun 2010
    Location Ontario, Canada
    Posts 128
    Rep Power 8

    Default

    I don't think I'd ever give up my religion in a Socialist/Communist society. Just my opinion. IIRC, everyone has the right to practise any religion they want.
    Previously known as Marceau
    Workers of All Countries, Unite!
  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Nikolay For This Useful Post:


  11. #48
    Join Date Mar 2010
    Location London, United Kingdom
    Posts 3,883
    Organisation
    Currently none, but critically support various organisations and parties
    Rep Power 47

    Default

    Not sure what this means.

    To say that my own religion tends to lack an anti-intellectual streak is not the same thing as to claim that it is intellectual. Merely that its adherents are not steered away from their own intellectual inquiries and directions.

    The thoroughly intellectual traditions of the Catholicism and Talmudic studies were not very welcoming of independant intellectual inquiry and directions.
    All religions are superstitious and irrational, but I'm more sympathetic to religions like Neo-Paganism relative to the great established religions of class society.
    [FONT=System]Long Live Proletarian Democracy!

    Down with All Imperialisms!
    [/FONT]
  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Queercommie Girl For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Religion in an anarchist society
    By Freedom Through Anarchy in forum Learning
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 23rd February 2008, 21:26
  2. Survival of Religion in a Communist society
    By RedWhite in forum Religion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 6th September 2006, 07:20
  3. Religion In A Communistic Society
    By Iohannis in forum Religion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 16th July 2006, 15:53
  4. Religion in the new Communist society
    By Break the Chains in forum Religion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 24th April 2005, 02:38
  5. is religion too important in society
    By cubist in forum Religion
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 18th June 2004, 13:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread