Thread: Mama Grizzlies!!

Results 1 to 3 of 3

  1. #1
    Join Date Feb 2010
    Location The dirty South
    Posts 2,340
    Organisation
    STFU, GTFO, lulz, WTF, LMAO
    Rep Power 43

    Default Mama Grizzlies!!

    + YouTube Video
    ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.


    While some may view this as just more Palin shenanigans, I think there is something to this. I think there is a general trend by conservatives and the fringe right to feminize their movement. We see this for example in O'Donnell's victory in Delaware, but more in the wider context of the right being the family values position. Well, I have no problem with this because I believe that this general trend will either fizzle out insignificantly, or if not, it is bound to backfire.

    My reasoning is that the rhetoric of femininity, as it occurs in the conservative movement is predicated on two things. Traditional family values, and the empowerment of women. I believe that these two positions are fundamentally and irreconcilably contradictory. Tradition family values rests on the assumption that a natural, god given, order exists in which women and men have fundamentally different roles to play within society. The role of women in society is within the private sphere, whereas a man's place is in the public sphere. I'm not going to delve into the specifics of what this entails in practice, but in short, it amounts to a woman's place is in the home, and men work to provide for the home. This is in no way compatible with any concept of women's empowerment, insofar as being restricted to the private sphere is a form of disempowerment, which it is.

    But clearly, Palin, O'Donnell, Coulter, and others who are spearheading this movement must realize that they themselves, as working, professional women, cannot subscribe to strictly traditional gender hierarchies (family values). Clearly, Palin must understand that "a fundamental transformation of America" was indeed necessary for someone like her achieve what she did, such as run as vice presidential candidate for the Republican party. This contradiction was felt most saliently when in the run up to the election, Palin could not decide if she was a feminist or not. This incident, which likely produced tremendous credibility problems for Palin, first in her denial of feminism, second in her avowal of it, and third, in her indecision about it, only represents the tip of the iceberg compared with what's in store for conservatives if they continue to push this line. Not smart, not smart at all.

    We can expect a resurgence of a strong, active, and powerful feminist movement in the months ahead if conservatives continue to push this line or do so more forcefully. As they do, they will be challenged on this basic contradiction that I have pointed out, and their position will become increasingly more incoherent.

    I say, hurray for Mama Grizzlies! A new day is dawning!
  2. #2
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Posts 23
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    No I think there will just be more aggressive female war mongers
  3. #3
    Join Date Feb 2010
    Location The dirty South
    Posts 2,340
    Organisation
    STFU, GTFO, lulz, WTF, LMAO
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    As an addendum to this analysis, I would like to point out that what I predicted is not predetermined, and the left will have some serious issues to contend with regarding the resurgent conservative feminism. It should not be ignored nor understated that this movement has at its disposal a very powerful tactical weapon the political use of which I have been fearing for quite some time now. I am referring then, to the use of charges of pedophilia as a means to discredit and/or otherwise silence people.

    If anyone has any doubt that this sort of moral panic can be created for political gain, I'd urge them to watch the Frontline documentary "The Child Terror."

    Paying close attention to the Mama Grizzlies rhetoric, there are hints that this is exactly what they're planning, although on a much larger and coordinated scale. Naturally, some things have changed. Child testimonies have come under scrutiny such that blatantly manipulating children into describing sexual conduct that did not occur is now more difficult. But it is often the case that the mere accusation of child abuse can result in permanent stigma and ostracism, regardless of whether or not there is any truth the the accusations. Still, it makes me uneasy to see how this movement is framing the issue as an urgent need to protect "Americas children," but from what? After 9/11, Bush boldly declared, you're either with us (meaning the neocons), or you're with the terrorists. Is it so far fetched to suggest a similar approach? You're either with us (The Tea Party) or you're with the pedophiles. We should not underestimate conservatives ability to mobilize fear.

    Pretty soon we'll start hearing about the pedophile next door. Men pedophiles. Women pedophiles. Even children pedophiles. We'll see human strawmen pushing a pedophile agenda. The liberal pedophiles up in Washington. The Marxist/Islamic/pedophile conspiracy. Pedophile cartoon which brainwash children. Pedophile hip hop, rock and metal. And don't forget, the pedophile internets!

    Chris Hanson ain't got nothin' on these *****es!

Similar Threads

  1. Y Tu Mama Tambien
    By Colombia in forum Cultural
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 7th September 2005, 05:50
  2. Y tu mamá también
    By Monty Cantsin in forum Cultural
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12th September 2004, 05:50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread