I was tempted to entitle this topic 'Bush - you might as well have a chimp in the White House' but decided it was far too serious to joke about ... that, and it would have been insulting to chimps.
At all times, but especially in times of disaster, nations need a strong leader - strong in terms of intellect, diplomacy, caution, humanity and eloquence (amongst other things). Think Kennedy's handling of the Cuban missile crisis. As an Australian I can say that Bush has made a very poor impression (to put it politely) on the majority of citizens here, throughout his 'leadership'.
If Republicans settled for Bush, thinking he'd 'do' and was only going to be a puppet anyway, even they must now be lamenting the lack of a real leader and hopefully, are painfully reminded of the importance of the individual who does occupy that office.
It cannot but be supportive, socialist, communist or whatever you want to call it. Does nature, and the human species with it, have much time left to survive in the absence of such change? Very little time. Who will be the builders of that new world? The