Thread: Unfair Restriction V

Results 1 to 20 of 510

  1. #1
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default Unfair Restriction V

    Note to all members who feel the desire to post in this thread:

    As of this post, I will be instructing all mods/admins to issue infractions to members who post in this thread for reasons other than outlined in the OP. I will repost it here:
    This is a thread for you restricted members to question your restriction if you feel that you were misjudged by the mod/admin team, but this is not the thread for your whine fest.Just express your point that you disagree with not overdoing it.Beside restricted members questionning their restriction, this thread is "open" just for posts asking for clarifications from the members in question.So if you dont fall in one of the above "categories" then simply dont post in here.This threads have been a pain in the ass of mods to mod it.
    So dont spam, dont post pictures, and dont make 100 posts whinnying for your restriction, we get what you are saying from the first time.
    So in short, you may post in this thread if your post involves the following:
    - Appealing your restriction which has not already been appealed within the past 6 months. This consists of your personal posts which demonstrate a) why your restriction was unjustified and/or b) how you have changed since.
    - Requesting clarification for your restriction. This refers to the rules you violated and the evidence against you. You are entitled to one post unless that post receives no responses, and/or, the responses at hand do not meet the criteria outlined above.

    Any other posts made in this thread, including posts made by the member in question upon making the original appeal/clarificatory post (i.e. debate posts), will result in an infraction.

    Once again, post in this thread for reasons other than those outlined in the OP as well as those outlined in this post, and you will receive an infraction.

    Have a lovely day.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Decolonize The Left For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Feb 2009
    Posts 873
    Organisation
    Crips
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    So......what are the chances of me getting unrestricted?
  4. #3
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    Zero cuz bureaucracy
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  5. #4
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    So......what are the chances of me getting unrestricted?
    What were you restricted for? Why do you think you shouldn't be restricted?

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  6. #5
    Join Date Feb 2009
    Posts 873
    Organisation
    Crips
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What were you restricted for? Why do you think you shouldn't be restricted?

    - August
    Well, I made a big post in the last thread but uh.....that's gone now.

    I was restricted for transphobia, I'm no longer transphobic.
  7. #6
    તમે બિલાડી કાયમ પ્રેમ Committed User
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location USA
    Posts 2,900
    Rep Power 46

    Post Jack's original post

    Well, I made a big post in the last thread but uh.....that's gone now.
    I was restricted for transphobia, I'm no longer transphobic.
    This is the post Jack is referring to, from the recently closed UR thread:
    I'm back after a long while away, and would like to be unrestricted. Essentially, this is what happened and why I believe I should be unrestricted.

    Originally I was restricted for transphobic arguments I made in a thread (the name of which I don't remember). Since then I've realized the idiocy of my comments and would like to apologize to all I offended while I was there (if they still remember me).

    During restriction, my IP (but not my account, and this is a new computer) was banned by a user named Ismail (who I'm sure most of you know). The reason was for creating a double account, which I admit to (and I believe has since been deleted), but the reason stated by Ismail for my creation of that account was to "troll Hoxhaists". This is false, during the creation of the account I was talking to Ismail, who I considered a friendly associate at the time (as we regularly conversed over AIM), and he supported it's creation so I could play the Balance of Power game he hosts in Chit Chat regularly.

    With this account I made two posts total, one saying I was a Hoxhaist. This was a way to poke fun at Ismail, as he is a Hoxhaist and I was an anarchist at the time. Days later, Ismail and I got into an argument in which we ceased speaking for several months, and after it I was IP banned from accessing RevLeft.

    I believe I should be unrestricted from the primary RevLeft website because I have retracted my original transphobic opinions, and I can contribute to the RevLeft community more so than I can being restricted. Additionally, as per the RevLeft forum rules, multiple accounting is only punishable by a warning point, not a complete IP ban. What has kept me from this website since November of 2009 has been moderator irresponsibility, not any ideological differences that would deter me from visiting.
  8. #7
    Join Date Jun 2009
    Posts 2,211
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Why am I restricted?
  9. #8
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Location Richmond, VA
    Posts 6,143
    Organisation
    I.M.C.C.
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    Why am I restricted?
    Because you support centralized, unequal power structures. Though maybe you should be unrestricted since your arguments to that end are some of the lousiest we've seen here!
  10. #9
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location Earth
    Posts 4,020
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Because you support centralized, unequal power structures.
    Why are you unrestricted?
    To speculate is human; to hedge, divine
  11. #10
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location England
    Posts 8,376
    Rep Power 74

    Default

    Why are you unrestricted?
    To be fair, I should be issuing you an automatic infraction. I'm not going to because I'm considering this a "grace period" where people who are used to unfair restrictions threads being full of all this kind of toss. Riddle me this, though, when you read this post:
    Note to all members who feel the desire to post in this thread:

    As of this post, I will be instructing all mods/admins to issue infractions to members who post in this thread for reasons other than outlined in the OP. I will repost it here:
    So in short, you may post in this thread if your post involves the following:
    - Appealing your restriction which has not already been appealed within the past 6 months. This consists of your personal posts which demonstrate a) why your restriction was unjustified and/or b) how you have changed since.
    - Requesting clarification for your restriction. This refers to the rules you violated and the evidence against you. You are entitled to one post unless that post receives no responses, and/or, the responses at hand do not meet the criteria outlined above.

    Any other posts made in this thread, including posts made by the member in question upon making the original appeal/clarificatory post (i.e. debate posts), will result in an infraction.

    Once again, post in this thread for reasons other than those outlined in the OP as well as those outlined in this post, and you will receive an infraction.

    Have a lovely day.

    - August
    Did you think that AugustWest had written it for his health?

    Right. That's it, next offtopic post, no matter how inocous seeming (even a response to the rhetorical question above) will be immediatly infracted. Any whining will not be tolerated.
    Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.

    [FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]

    "Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.

    Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jazzratt For This Useful Post:


  13. #11
    Join Date Jun 2009
    Posts 2,211
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Right. That's it, next offtopic post, no matter how inocous seeming (even a response to the rhetorical question above) will be immediatly infracted. Any whining will not be tolerated.
    + YouTube Video
    ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
  14. #12
    Join Date Aug 2010
    Location Kitty
    Posts 664
    Organisation
    Rainbow Family of Living Light
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Why have I been restricted without even making any posts? I sent a PM to one of the administrators asking for clarification about whether my views, (third worldism), were considered an OI, and what I can post without danger, and was immediately placed on restricted status.

    If third worldism is really considered so noxious that it cannot be tolerated in any form, I would be happy to not post anything at all about it. But I don't see why merely believing first world workers are not exploited under the LTOV is grounds for restriction.
  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Thug Lessons For This Useful Post:


  16. #13
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location cyp-rus
    Posts 5,903
    Rep Power 57

    Default

    Whether you believe it or not, it plays no matter.Your restriction stands until you change your ideas.
    OMONOIA
    ANARCHOCOMMUNIS
    M

    You're never over
  17. #14
    Join Date Feb 2009
    Posts 873
    Organisation
    Crips
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Uh, soo......
  18. #15
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    There's a thread~
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  19. #16
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    Jack, there is a thread currently running in the Moderator's Forum to discuss and vote on your possible unrestriction. You will be notified upon its conclusion.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  20. #17
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Location California
    Posts 1,229
    Organisation
    U.S. Army.
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Apparantly I've been restricted due to my views on Yellow Socialism. They said it was proto-fascist. That is incorrect. It is a strain of socialism coined by a French socialist. If at worst, it is in the loosest sense proto-syndicalist. A mod accused it of corporatism but that would take quite a wide, wide, generalized definition of corporatism, and I disagree with that charge. I am a leftist and a socialist.
  21. #18
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    Yeah, no. Type up a blog or post and clarify your ideas for us if you want, but from what I know yellow socialism, I'm surprised you aren't banned.
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  22. #19
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Location California
    Posts 1,229
    Organisation
    U.S. Army.
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Why have a message board if you are just going to intellectually masturbate each other?
  23. #20
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Location Germany
    Posts 2,604
    Organisation
    autonomous
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Why have a message board if you are just going to intellectually masturbate each other?
    Cos it's more fun if there's strangers.
  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Widerstand For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. ComradeMan- unfair restriction and complaint
    By ComradeMan in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 7th January 2010, 00:19
  2. No one knows what the unfair restriction thread is for anymore
    By IcarusAngel in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 18th November 2009, 07:28
  3. Unfair Restriction?
    By Jazzratt in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 631
    Last Post: 1st March 2008, 20:13
  4. Unfair bias
    By Redmau5 in forum Religion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8th May 2005, 03:38

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread