Thread: Labor/Employment Statistics

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location The Upside Down
    Posts 11,499
    Rep Power 196

    Default Labor/Employment Statistics

    I'm not restricted but I'm going to post this here anyways.

    The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) for the United States shows changes from June 2009 - June 2010. (New stats are out tomorrow August 6th)

    http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm

    How accurate is this?

    How significant are the changes?

    I've heard since I came to Oregon that the state has the highest unemployment rate in the country. Apparently Nevada does? - And Oregon isn't even in the top of that list anymore?


    http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/Surv...=LASST41000003
    "whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"

    http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
  2. #2
    Join Date Feb 2005
    Posts 1,701
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    Different organizations have different procedures for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting statistics. I'm not sure of the techniques the US government uses, but I've always used their statistics because they tend to be broader and you can generally get the raw data to verify their information. Plus, they're considered accurate and reliable by researchers. If you have to two different organizations that are reporting relatively the same results, it's safe to say that the results are pretty valid. If not, I'd ask how the data is collected.
    GLS/SS d- s-:- a- C+++ P+ L+++ W+++ w-- PS+++ PE t R+++ tv+ b+ D++ e+++ h+ r---

    The admin-mod team lacks standards.

    "[...]driving down the highway screaming 'Ploterait of the world, unite!'."
  3. #3
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location The Upside Down
    Posts 11,499
    Rep Power 196

    Default

    http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-...04-713738.html


    This would only affect (as the article mentions) states with an unemployment rate over 12% which is five states (including Puerto Rico)- according to BLS.

    Nevermind- the fucking site makes you subscribe in order to read all of the article-
    "whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"

    http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
  4. #4
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location The Upside Down
    Posts 11,499
    Rep Power 196

    Default

    "whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"

    http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
  5. #5
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Location Richmond, VA
    Posts 6,143
    Organisation
    I.M.C.C.
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    I'm not restricted but I'm going to post this here anyways.

    The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) for the United States shows changes from June 2009 - June 2010. (New stats are out tomorrow August 6th)

    http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm

    How accurate is this?
    It depends. Labor statistics leave out notable parts of the population:
    -those who have "stopped looking for work"
    -those whose labor does not accrue rpofit or utility for a registered company or similar legal organization (i.e. mothers or subsistence farmers)

    How significant are the changes?
    It's hard to say. Short-term changes and single-point comparisons are never really considered to be exceptionally significant, as I understand it. It's all about trends.
  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Dean For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Hey, just a few questions on employment...
    By koala girlie in forum Learning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8th October 2006, 22:41
  2. Russian labor statistics from 1900-1918
    By More Fire for the People in forum Research
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th August 2005, 16:23

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts