Results 41 to 41 of 41
Sorry, but I am not aware of this "ad hoc bureaucracy". Are you referring to the likes of Dave Nellist? If you are,* then I think you need to seriously review your definition of "bureaucrat". Bureaucracy implies some sort of superfluous top-layer of an organisation that is divorced from the rank-and-file. If this is what you're implying, it's totally false. I was out canvassing with Dave for pretty much the whole day today; it's not like he and Crow are sitting about, twiddling their thumbs till May the 6th.
*it's totally possible that I'm missing out on what you're getting at here, if so, apologies for sounding grumpy or abrupt.
Both for the production on a mass scale of this communist consciousness, and for the success of the cause itself, the alteration of men on a mass scale is, necessary, an alteration which can only take place in a practical movement, a revolution; this revolution is necessary, therefore, not only because the ruling class cannot be overthrown in any other way, but also because the class overthrowing it can only in a revolution succeed in ridding itself of all the muck of ages and become fitted to found society anew
