"White Anti-Racist is an Oxymoron"

[Red Icepick]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The White Anti-Racist Is an Oxymoron:[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]An Open Letter to “White Anti-Racists”[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]By Tamara K. Nopper[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]I received an annoying e-mail about white people and their struggle to do anti-racist work. I keep reading and hearing white people talk about their struggle to do anti-racist organizing, and frankly it gets on my nerves. So I am writing this open letter to white people who engage in any activist work that involves or affects non-whites. Given that the US social structure is founded on white supremacy, and that there is a global order in which white supremacy and European domination are at large, I would challenge any white person to figure out what movement or action they can get involved in that will not involve or affect non-white people.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]That said, I want to begin with what has become a realization for me through the help of different politically conscious friends. There is NO SUCH THING AS A WHITE ANTI-RACIST. The term itself, "white anti- racist" is an oxymoron. In the following, I will explain why. Then, I will begin to detail how this impacts non-white people in organizing work specifically, along with how it affects non-white people generally.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]First, one must realize that whiteness is a structure of domination. As such, there is nothing redeemable or reformable about whiteness. Intellectuals, scholars and activists, especially those who are non- white, have drawn our attention to this for years. For example, people such as Malcolm X, W.E.B. DuBois, Marcus Garvey, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Ida B. Wells, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and many, many others who are perhaps less famous, have articulated the relationship between whiteness and domination.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Further, people such as Douglass and DuBois began to outline how whiteness is a social and political construct that emphasizes the domination, authority, and perceived humanity of those who are racialized as white. They, along with many other non-white writers and orators, have pointed to the fact that it was the bodies who were able to be racialized as "white" that were able to be viewed as rational, authoritative, and deserving. Further, and believe me, this is no small thing, white people are viewed as human. What this means is that when white people suffer, as some who are poor/female/queer, they nevertheless are able to have some measure of sympathy for their plight simply because they are white and their marginalization is considered an emergency, crisis or an issue to be concerned about.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Furthermore, even when white people have been oppressed by various dimensions of classism, homophobia and heterosexism, they have been able to opt for what DuBois, in his monograph "Black Reconstruction" brilliantly called "the psychological wage of whiteness." That is, whites that are marginalized could find comfort, even if psychological, in the fact that they were not non-white. They could revel in the fact that they could be taken as white in opposition to non-white groups. The desire for this wage of whiteness was also what drove many white people, albeit marginalized, to engage in organized violence against non-whites.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Of course, legal cases such as the Dred Scott Decision along with many different naturalization cases involving Asian individuals, has helped to encode a state-sanctioned definition of whiteness. But there are other ways in which white people can be racialized as white by the state. They are not stopped while driving as much as non-white people. Their homes and businesses are not raided and searched as much by police officers, INS or License and Inspections (L&I). White people's bodies are not tracked and locked up in prisons, detention centers, juvenile systems, detention halls in classrooms, "special education" classes, etc. White people's bodies are not generally the site of fear, repulsion, violent desire, or hatred.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now some might point out to me that white people are followed, tracked and harassed by individuals and state agents such as the police. This is true. Some white women get sexually harassed and experience state-sanctioned discrimination. Queer whites are the subject of homophobia, whether by individuals or by the state through laws and the police. Some queer whites are harassed by cops. Activist whites are stopped by police. White people who play rap music and wear gear are stopped by cops. Poor whites can be criminalized, especially by the state around welfare issues. What I want to point out is that, while I do not condone police violence and harassment, there is a way in which white people will not be viewed as inherently criminal or suspect unless they are perceived as doing something that breaks particular norms.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Conversely, other racial groups, particularly Blacks and Native Americans, are considered inherently criminal no matter what they do, what their sexual identity is or what they wear. Further, it has always struck me as interesting that there are white people who will attempt to wear what signifies "Blackness," whether it is dreadlocks (which, in my opinion, should be cut off from every white person's head), "gear," or Black masks at rallies. There is a sick way in which white people want to emulate that which is considered "badass" about a certain existential position of Blackness at the same time they do not want the burden of living as a non-white person. Further, it really strikes me as fucked up the way in which white people will go to rallies and taunt the police with Black masks in order to bring on police pressure. What does it mean when Blackness is strategically used by whites to bring on police violence? Now I know that somewhere there is a dreadlocked, smelly white anarchist who is reading this message and who is angry with me for not understanding the logic of the Black masks and its roots in anarchism. But I would challenge these people to consider how they are reproducing a violence towards Blackness in their attempts to taunt and challenge the police in their efforts.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now back to my point that white anti-racism is an oxymoron. Whiteness is a social and political construct rooted in white supremacy. White supremacy is a structure and system of beliefs rooted in European and US imperialism in which certain racialized bodies (non-white) are selected for premature negation whether through cultural, physical, psychological genocide, containment or other forms of social death. White supremacy is at the heart of the US social system and civil society. In short, white supremacy is not just a series of practices or privilege, but a larger social structure and system of domination that overly-values and rewards those who are racialized as white. The rest of us are constructed as undeserving to be considered human, although there is significant variation within non-white populations of how our bodies are encoded, treated and (de)valued.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now, for one to claim whiteness, one also is invested in white supremacy. Whiteness itself is a political term that emerged among European white ethnics in the US. These European ethnics, many of them reviled, chose to cast their lot with whiteness rather than that with those who had been determined as non-white. In short, anyone who claims to be white, even a white anti-racist, is identifying with a history of European imperialism and racism transported and further developed into the US.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, this does not mean that white people who go around saying dumb things such as "I am not white! I am a human being!" or, "I left whiteness and joined the human race," or my favorite, "I hate white people! They're stupid" are not structurally white. Remember, whiteness is a structure of domination embedded in our social relations, institutions, discourses, and practices. Don't tell me you're not white but then when we go out in the street and the police don't bother you or people don't ask you if you're a prostitute, or if people don't follow you and touch you at will, act like that does not make a difference in our lives. Basically, you can't talk, or merely "unlearn" whiteness, as all of these annoying trainings for white people to "unlearn" racism will have you think.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Rather, white people need to be willing to have their very social position, their very relationship of domination, their very authority, their very being...let go, perhaps even destroyed. I know this might sound scary, but that is really not my concern. I am not interested in making white people, even those so-called good-hearted anti-racist whites, comfortable about their position in struggles that shape my life in ways that it will never shape theirs. I recently finished the biography of John Brown by DuBois. The biography was less of a biography and more of an interpretation by DuBois about the now-legendary white abolitionist. Now while John Brown's practice was problematic in many ways--he still had to be in control and he had fucked-up views that Blacks were still enslaved because they were too "servile" (a white supremacist sentiment)--what I took from Brown's life was that he realized that moral persuasion alone would not solve racial problems. That is, whites cannot talk or just think through whiteness and structures of white supremacy. They must be committed to either picking up arms for other people (and only firing when the people tell them so), dying for other people, or just getting out of the way. In short, they must be willing to do what the people most affected and marginalized by a situation tell them to do.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now I am sure that right now there are some white people saying that other people cannot understand what is going on, that they do not have the critical analysis to figure stuff out, or that non-white people have fucked up ideas. This is just white supremacist bullshit because it is rooted in the idea that non-white people have not interpreted their experiences and cannot run things themselves. It also assumes that there are not internal conversations within communities--which I do not think white people need to be privy to or participate in--in which people struggle out their own visions for society and how to go about achieving them. In short, this perspective by whites that non-white people cannot be in control of our own destinies is rooted in a paternally-racist approach to non-white people.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Further, it is also rooted in the idea that white people are not racist or do not benefit from racism. Rather, white people at meetings will often discuss how they feel "silenced" by non-whites, or that they are being "put in their place." Let me make one thing clear: it is impossible for a non-white person to put a white person in her place. This is not to say that non-white people cannot have a sexist or homophobic attitude towards a white person. But to say, or even hint at that as a "WHITE" person someone is being put in their place--whoever says this just needs to shut the fuck up because that is some bull. It is impossible for whiteness to be put in one's place, because that is a part of whiteness, the ability to take up space and feel a prerogative to do so.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Further, the idea that white people are being put into their place relies on the neo-conservative view of reverse racism that has characterized the backlash against non-whites, especially Blacks, in the post-civil rights era. So when you say these types of things you are actually helping to reproduce a neo-conservative racial rhetoric which relies on the myth of the "threatened" and "displaced" white person.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Additionally, white activism, especially white anti-racism, is predicated on an economy of gratitude. We are supposed to be grateful that a white person is willing to work with non-white people. We are supposed to be grateful that you actually want to work with us and that you give us your resources. I would like to know why you have those resources and others do not? And don't assume that just because I have to ask you for resources that it does not hurt me, pain me even. Don't assume that when you come into the space, that doesn't bother me. Don't assume that when you talk first, talk the most, and talk the most often, that this doesn't hurt me. Don't assume that when I see you get the attention and accolades and the book deals and the speaking engagements that this does not hurt me (because you profit off of pain). And don't assume that when I see how grateful non-white people are to you for being there, for being a "good white" person that this doesn't hurt me. And don't assume that when I get chastised by non-white people because I think your presence is unnecessary that it does not hurt me. Because all of these things remind me of how powerless non-white people are (albeit differently) in relation to white people. All of these gestures that you do reminds me of how grateful I am supposed to be towards you because you actually (or supposedly) care about what is happening to me. I am a bit resentful of economies of gratitude.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Further, this structure of white supremacy known as white anti-racism also impacts the larger social world because it still makes white people the most valued people. Non-white people are forced to feel dependent and grateful to white people who will actually interact with us. We are made to feel that we are inferior, incapable, that we really do need white people. And the sad thing is, that given all of the resources that whiteness has and that white people get and control, there is an element of material truth in all of this, I am afraid. But white people need to think of how their activism reproduces the actual structure of white supremacy some--not all whites activists--profess to be about. This structure of white supremacy is not just in an activist space, it actually touches upon and impinges on the lives of non-white people who may not be activists (in your sense) or who do not interact with you in activist worlds.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]But consider what your presence means in a community that you decide to set up your community garden in, or your bookstore in, or your meeting space in, or have your march in. What does it mean when you decide that you want to be "with" the oppressed and you end up displacing them? Just because you walk around with your dreadlocks, or decide that you will not wear expensive clothes does not mean that your whiteness does not displace people in the spaces you decide to put yourself in. How do you help to bring more forms of authority and control in a neighborhood, whether through increased rent and housing costs, more policing, or just the ways in which your white bodies can make people feel, as a brilliant friend of mine once asked, "squatters in somebody else's project"?[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]So what does this mean for the future of white anti-racists? This might mean to first, figure out ways in which whiteness needs to die as a social structure and as an identity in which you organize your anti-racist work. What this looks like in practice may not be so clear but I will attempt to give some suggestions here. First, don't call us, we'll call you. If we need your resources, we will contact you. But don't show up, flaunt your power in our faces and then get angry when we resent the fact that you have so many resources we don't and that we are not grateful for this arrangement. And don't get mad because you can't make decisions in the process. Why do you need to? Secondly, stop speaking for us. We can talk for ourselves. Third, stop trying to point out internal contradictions in our communities, we know what they are, we are struggling around them, and I really do not know how white people can be helpful to non- whites to clear these up. Fourth, don't ever say some shit to me about how you feel silenced, marginalized, discriminated against, or put in your place. Period. Finally, start thinking of what it would mean, in terms of actual structured social arrangements, for whiteness and white identity--even the white antiracist kind (because there really is no redeemable or reformed white identity)--to be destroyed.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]In conclusion, I want to say to anyone who thinks that this is too academic or abstract, I write as a non-white person, meaning that from my body, my person, I experience white supremacy. I also draw my understanding of white supremacy from non-white people, many engaged in various struggles of activism, but most importantly just to speak out and stay alive. They did not get accolades from many for speaking out but instead experienced constant threats on their lives for just existing and doing the work that they did. Moreover, I want to know when a discussion of whiteness, white supremacy and domination became seen as abstract and not rooted in the everyday concrete reality that we experience?[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]http://racetraitor.org/[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial]Is this article offensive? Discuss.[/FONT]

[Die Rote Fahne]

Seems pretty ignorant.

Although yes, it is a power structure where, in the US and Europe, white have come out on top, it's not because we choose it.

I don't want any power structure, especially in terms of race.

So, why can I not be anti-racist? Because I'm at the top? What If I think that I don't deserve to be at the top and I want the power structure to fall so we are all equally valuable to each other and under law?

This person comes across as racist against white people. Not to say that she hasn't a reason to hate the power structure, but to say "you can't" is fucking ignorant.

[Red Icepick]

Yeah, pretty much my thoughts on it. I mean, what are we supposed to do? Start oppressing people? The author seems to suggest that by not wanting to dominate other races or not thinking we are superior, we are trying to out-do other races or hold ourselves up as entitled to a more important audience. It's really a load of bunk. This is racist, and I don't see how this kind of racism is healthier than any other. Also historically, whites have not always been in the position they are.

[Qwerty Dvorak]

tl;dr

But from the looks of the first paragraph it's a load of shit.

[Quail]

I agree with what everyone else has said. I never asked to be born in this particular social position, and I don't see why that should stop me from opposing racism, simply because white people have oppressed others in the past.
The author also suggests that white people expect gratitude for not being racist, which seems like a sweeping generalisation based on an outdated stereotype. It appears that it didn't occur to her that people of any race can just dislike discrimination.

[TheCultofAbeLincoln]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]However, this does not mean that white people who go around saying dumb things such as "I am not white! I am a human being!" or, "I left whiteness and joined the human race," or my favorite, "I hate white people! They're stupid" are not structurally white. Remember, whiteness is a structure of domination embedded in our social relations, institutions, discourses, and practices. Don't tell me you're not white but then when we go out in the street and the police don't bother you or people don't ask you if you're a prostitute, or if people don't follow you and touch you at will, act like that does not make a difference in our lives. Basically, you can't talk, or merely "unlearn" whiteness, as all of these annoying trainings for white people to "unlearn" racism will have you think.[/FONT]

But I like mustard, not mayo!

Just kidding. Mayo is completely superior to colored condiments.

[Richard Nixon]

Worst blog post ever.

[Red Icepick]

[FONT=Arial]I have to admit that I LOLed at this:[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]"Conversely, other racial groups, particularly Blacks and Native Americans, are considered inherently criminal no matter what they do, what their sexual identity is or what they wear. Further, it has always struck me as interesting that there are white people who will attempt to wear what signifies "Blackness," whether it is dreadlocks (which, in my opinion, should be cut off from every white person's head), "gear," or Black masks at rallies. There is a sick way in which white people want to emulate that which is considered "badass" about a certain existential position of Blackness at the same time they do not want the burden of living as a non-white person. Further, it really strikes me as fucked up the way in which white people will go to rallies and taunt the police with Black masks in order to bring on police pressure. What does it mean when Blackness is strategically used by whites to bring on police violence? Now I know that somewhere there is a dreadlocked, smelly white anarchist who is reading this message and who is angry with me for not understanding the logic of the Black masks and its roots in anarchism. But I would challenge these people to consider how they are reproducing a violence towards Blackness in their attempts to taunt and challenge the police in their efforts."[/FONT]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial]

WTF highlights in bold.[/FONT]

[Valeofruin]

Shes partially right:

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]

Rather, white people need to be willing to have their very social position, their very relationship of domination, their very authority, their very being...let go, perhaps even destroyed. I know this might sound scary, but that is really not my concern. I am not interested in making white people, even those so-called good-hearted anti-racist whites, comfortable about their position in struggles that shape my life in ways that it will never shape theirs.

I just don't think she realized how offending and noneducational she sounds. Shes supposed to be recruiting whites to joining the cause to abandon all aristocracy and divisions among the working class. Instead shes telling us we're all racist and to get the fuck off....

Poorest tactics I've seen in a while.
[/FONT]

[Red Icepick]

I wouldn't even say she's partialy right because she is not referring to breaking down the social construct of race. Rather, she wants to revert back to racialism, but turn the tables. It's really an unhealthy attitude.

[Kwisatz Haderach]

Heh, the author of that article needs a good dose of Marxism. All oppression is rooted in class oppression, and she barely mentions class at all. Non-white people are not being oppressed by "whites", because, as she correctly pointed out, the "white race" is a stupid social construct. Non-white people are being oppressed by the bourgeoisie, who finds it useful to promote racism (and hence oppression of non-whites) in order to divide and weaken the working class.

The solution to oppression is for the workers of all countries and all skin colours to unite. As such, the article isn't just wrong, it's actively harmful to the cause of liberation.

[Pyotr Tchaikovsky]

Heh, the author of that article needs a good dose of Marxism. All oppression is rooted in class oppression,.

Sorry, but that's a naive thing to say. Sexism, racism, homophobia etc. may exist even if class oppression doesn't. They aren't related in any way. This has always been a problem with the Marxist analysis...it's too simplistic and reductionist.

and she barely mentions class at all. Non-white people are not being oppressed by "whites", because, as she correctly pointed out, the "white race" is a stupid social construct

Let's say God is a myth, but that hasn't stopped fanatics from using that myth to oppress people. Likewise, race too may be a stupid social construct, a myth and nothing more, but that doesn't prevent racists from using that myth to oppress people.

[Kwisatz Haderach]

Let's say God is a myth, but that hasn't stopped fanatics from using that myth to oppress people. Likewise, race too may be a stupid social construct, a myth and nothing more, but that doesn't prevent racists from using that myth to oppress people.

Right. But I am saying that we should not endorse the race myth.

Sorry, but that's a naive thing to say. Sexism, racism, homophobia etc. may exist even if class oppression doesn't. They aren't related in any way. This has always been a problem with the Marxist analysis...it's too simplistic and reductionist.

No, I don't think so. If class oppression did not exist, then no one would stand to gain anything from sexism, racism, homophobia etc. Marxism argues - and I agree - that people generally do not do things that will not bring them a material benefit. If no one stands to gain anything from X, then very few people will do X, and there is a good chance that X will fade out of existence entirely.

[Skooma Addict]

Oh boo hoo, another delusional person claiming that they are oppressed. The author also failed to explain how "white anti-racist" is an oxymoron. This persons whining is an insult to those who actually have to overcome serious adversities which are beyond their control.

[Red Icepick]

Go figure, the fascists have found already taken advantage of this irresponsible article:

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=58147

Apparently they check out this site more than Noel Ignatievs!

[Bud Struggle]

Go figure, the fascists have found already taken advantage of this irresponsible article:

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=58147

Apparently they check out this site more than Noel Ignatievs!

Quite a hate filled site--is that some sort of Stormfront lite? (Or maybe not so lite.)

["Red Scum"]

dreadlocks (which, in my opinion, should be cut off from every white person's head)

Stopped reading here and so should all of you. Fascism.

[Jazzratt]

Quite a hate filled site--is that some sort of Stormfront lite? (Or maybe not so lite.)

If stormfront and all of the insane stalinoids on (or banned from) revleft were genetically spliced and the resulting child was dropped on the head and left in a cellar until it grew up that child would be the phora. Fucking nutters, full of Nazbols too.

[graffic]

"Race" don't exist.