Comrade On's synopsis in that other thread is largely accurate.
And if you look at what he writes, he argues that socialism developed under the Bolsheviks more or less as one would reasonablly expect. Until that point when his (or her) ox was gored, then suddenly the revolution was hijacked. Which is no different, as I recall, from what you have oft said, it simply now a matter of timing and which ox. At that point you both agree that the failure is not the revolution, but those people who betrayed the revolution.


