In the ISO we actually use the word "brother" or "sister" in place of "comrade" most times. I'm not sure how it got started.
Results 41 to 48 of 48
In the ISO we actually use the word "brother" or "sister" in place of "comrade" most times. I'm not sure how it got started.
In general, I have no problem with recruiting low level police and prison guards into the movement. Most successful organizations do so, including major religions and whatnot, simply because it's good to have eyes and ears in the local police network.
In this case, recruiting a union leader, it smacks of selling out.
Selling out to what exactly? Union struggle for Prison Officers?
"I want to say sweet, silly things." - V.I Lenin
Selling out by inviting in people who's only real aim is control over workers - separate from the state, but trying to corral them for selfish purposes either way - to the party.
That's a terribly schematic view, don't you think? How is Caton "aiming to control the workers" for "selfish needs" exactly?
"I want to say sweet, silly things." - V.I Lenin
I think that if you read what I've written elsewhere, you'll understand that is most certainly not the case.
What most certainly is the case is that unless we manage to win over a considerable portion of the armed sections of the state, there will be no revolution. In this day and age, no one is capable of defeating a modern military force that is fully committed to winning.
http://www2.cddc.vt.edu/marxists/his...re-trotsky.pdf
Not only was Trotsky a member, but so were Bukharin and Kollentai.
Or, if you want something from Trotsky himself, read My Life, the chapter "New York" where he discusses his time in the SP.
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trot...ylife/ch22.htm
Last edited by chegitz guevara; 7th October 2009 at 03:52.
As opposed to you, who doesn't support the right to kill a cop in self-defense. We should just let the cops murder us in the streets without fighting back, Fred?
It probably started with many people's obsessions with the Black Panther Party.Originally Posted by Random Precision
Yes, of course we should intervene in actions taken by various sections of the state against the state as a whole, and specifically with regards to this situation that would involve getting involved in this union's strike actions, learning where they are at and what they are fighting for, and then explaining to them the larger picture and where they fit into that picture. What we shouldn't be doing (and which I thought was quite obvious) is recruiting members of the state into our organizations.Originally Posted by chegitz guevara