I believe he had that label then aswell to the capitalists.
Results 1 to 20 of 47
I think so...
I believe he had that label then aswell to the capitalists.
Yes he would definately have been labled a terrorist by most [ignorant people]. Just look at all the rebel groups in Latin America today, they're often referred to as terrorists. And if you think about the true definition of terrorist, he was one. He caused terror among the elites. However, the U.S. army causes terror throughout the world on the largest scale of all time, and not many people consider them terrorists.
(Edited by CheViveToday at 11:07 pm on Mar. 6, 2003)
CheViveToday
yeah i know, but i think he'd be labeled as a terrorist by the state department and US media.
Yes. I think it's safe to say however, he would never become as infamous or hated as Bin Laden. They are different types of terrorists. Hmm....maybe I'm wrong though. If the U.S. began to feel really threatened by him [Che], I'm sure they could make him look as bad as they wanted. And unfortunately, people would believe it.
CheViveToday
Che was a terrorist; anyone he kills with a political motive is a terrorist. In the eyes of many Che’s acts of terrorism was a fight for freedom. The things that Che did, and more importantly the reasons for doing so, are completely different (and I would say more justifiable) to the terrorism of the CIA.
(Edited by Commie01 at 10:13 am on Mar. 7, 2003)
Idiots,morons, dunces!!!
What are all of you speaking about!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
CheViveToday....Fuck, I didn't expect THAT from you!!!
And isn't it shame: to tell everyone that he was a terrorist and wear nick "CheViveToday"???
NO!!! HE WASN'T A TERRORIST!!! ALL OF YOU ARE JUST A MEMBERS OF ALPHA66 OR YANKEE!!!
Viva El Che!!! Fuck the morons!!! Hasta La Victoria Siempre!!!
Wise up Kapitan Andrey, CheViveToday is not saying that he was a terrorist, he is saying that he would be labelled a terrorist by George Bush and Friends, which is true.
However, I do not consider him a terrorist, America would.
<span style=\'color:red\'>"I'm going to brutalize you so forcibly, Buddha will explode!!"</span>
yes i agree........the george bush and tony blair "posse" would definetly have grouped him with bin laden and company.
there is a difference though......che only believed in action where he was going to gain something for the group he was fighting with rather than just acts of violence to make a point.
obviously intellectuals amongst realise che is quite simply not a terrorist.
Come The Millenium Month 12, In The Home Of The Greatest Power, The Village Idiot Will Come Forth To Be Acclaimed The Leader
I bet you don't even know how to pronounce: "Hasta La Victoria Siempre!" Anyways he would be seen as one of those columbian rebels. I think the rebels deserve to take over columbia so long as they dont massacre they're own people.
i was just wondering who was that aimed at and why? "I bet you don't even know how to pronounce: "Hasta La Victoria Siempre!""
Come The Millenium Month 12, In The Home Of The Greatest Power, The Village Idiot Will Come Forth To Be Acclaimed The Leader
Of course we have no idea to whom that was aimed, but it seems that it was completley unprovoked and unnecessary, is pronounciation all that matters? Do you know if whoever you aimed that fruident remark can pronounce it, even if the auido clip is playedat the entrance to this website.
Azygous was simply but making a statement that this change in political thinking of America would have had him labelled a terrorist, as they do this to anyone they hate so that the American people will hate them too.
<span style=\'color:red\'>"I'm going to brutalize you so forcibly, Buddha will explode!!"</span>
Terrorists?
What is this?
The only thing that is terrorising me and the world are not the Zapatistas or the Colombian guerrilas but the state terrorism as expressed in political prisoning even in the so called "land of freedom" that lets you talk most times freely but makes sure you are not heard.
Well some terrorists kill for religious reasons innocent people that I personally regard unacceptable(Twin Towers).Many say that in the way to freedom innocent lifes must be killed.I say that if we can we spare the the guilty lifes in order to save some more innocents.
But unfortunately the struggle against regimes and vice versa alaway takes its death toll from innocent people.But what makes it seem more violent when happens from the opposers is the government-controlled media.
happyguy...Are you bleak?
CheViveToday:"And if you think about the true definition of terrorist, he [Che] was one. He caused terror among the elites."
What can you say now?
wtf?!? calm down comrade....
Just cause I said Che was a terrorist does not make me a member of alpha666!
Che does fit with the dictionary definition of terrorism. That doesn't necessarily mean that the things he did were wrong.
Oh, shit, I forgot about his other post above that. However, it is true that he may have fitted with the dictionary definition, but that not necessarily make him one. He did not terrorise the masses though, he was a freedom fighter.
<span style=\'color:red\'>"I'm going to brutalize you so forcibly, Buddha will explode!!"</span>
He was definitely not a terrorist and he didn't support terrorism. However, it's clear that Bushyguy and Blairpuppie would have referred to him as a terrorist.
Calm down, that's not what I meant at all. I'm not a moron. Che was a terrorist to the ruling class of Cuba and elsewhere, but he is a hero to us. And that is how it should be.
Yes, exactly
CheViveToday
Well, seems like that was a missunderstanding. I guess the simple answer to the thread is 'Yes and he was also labeled like that before'. Things got out of context. Now now, pull yourself together
(Edited by tetelives at 9:54 pm on Mar. 9, 2003)
xox
Domino
Formerly "tetelives".
Well, you know, it all depends on perspective. My feeling are that he was a freedom fighter. Would millions, even billions of people like Che if he was a terrorist? I think not.?
Che is inspiration for people because he fought for them.
