Thread: french muslim women forbidden to go to the pool beccause of her burkini

Results 1 to 20 of 242

  1. #1
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Location quebec,canada
    Posts 5,570
    Rep Power 43

    Default french muslim women forbidden to go to the pool beccause of her burkini

    discrimination or strict application of the pool rules? you choose.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8197917.stm

    Personally i think it was a right move, i believe exceptions should be made for those suffering special physical conditions like for exemple skin disease.
    WHY kléber, WHY!!!!!!!
  2. #2
    Join Date Sep 2008
    Location Occupied Cascadia
    Posts 392
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    how is this not discrimination

    or are you pro-discrimination
  3. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kukulofori For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location Earth
    Posts 4,020
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    If you don't like watching women bath with those suits and/or watch people bath with skin disease, then look away.
    To speculate is human; to hedge, divine
  5. #4
    Join Date Mar 2003
    Location Sol system
    Posts 12,306
    Organisation
    Deniers of Messiahs
    Rep Power 137

    Default

    What a ridiculous outfit. Even Victorian bathing suits showed more skin. What's the point in going swimming if you're going to wear pretty much the exact same thing you wear when not?
    The Human Progress Group

    Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
    Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains - Karl Marx
    Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
    The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky


    Check out my speculative fiction project: NOVA MUNDI
  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ÑóẊîöʼn For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    Goddamn, France. Why are you so dumb
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to #FF0000 For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location Florida
    Posts 10,555
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    As the article said--it's a health issue. The lady is using the pool as a washing machine for her clothes. The same rule of no swimming with clothes on applies to everyone.
  10. #7
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Posts 4,175
    Rep Power 99

    Default

    As the article said--it's a health issue. The lady is using the pool as a washing machine for her clothes.
    What a frankly ridiculous thing to say. If you wear so much as a speedo to the pool, guess what? You're guilty of using the pool as a washing machine for your clothes.
  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to khad For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location Earth
    Posts 4,020
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    As the article said--it's a health issue. The lady is using the pool as a washing machine for her clothes. The same rule of no swimming with clothes on applies to everyone.
    We should take our swimming suits then, we wouldn't want to use the pool as a washing machine for our swimming suits.

    We should take our bodies away too. God knows where that filthy people have been around naked in their own flesh

    Seriously Bud, that's why its a burkini. It's supposed to only be used to take a bath. She has burkas for casual wear.
    To speculate is human; to hedge, divine
  13. #9
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location Florida
    Posts 10,555
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What a frankly ridiculous thing to say. If you wear so much as a speedo to the pool, guess what? You're guilty of using the pool as a washing machine for your clothes.
    Well then the less the better. Besides the law says no swimming with clothes on--the fact that the clothes have some sort of fancy name doesn't make them any less "clothes."


    Originally Posted by Hayenmill
    Seriously Bud, that's why its a burkini. It's supposed to only be used to take a bath. She has burkas for casual wear.
    Do you really expect French pool attendants to follow the exotic swimwear fashions of Dubai?

    She's an attention whore--nothing more.
  14. #10
    Anarchist-Communist Supporter
    Forum Moderator
    Admin
    Join Date Sep 2003
    Location England
    Posts 14,875
    Rep Power 130

    Default

    Seriously Bud, that's why its a burkini. It's supposed to only be used to take a bath. She has burkas for casual wear.
    Baths are for washing yourself, not lying in fully clothed.
  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RedAnarchist For This Useful Post:


  16. #11
    Anarchist-Communist Supporter
    Forum Moderator
    Admin
    Join Date Sep 2003
    Location England
    Posts 14,875
    Rep Power 130

    Default

    Do you really expect French pool attendants to follow the exotic swimwear fashions of Dubai?

    She's an attention whore--nothing more.

    Why Dubai? The woman is French.

    She's not an attention whore, shes just taking her religion too far. The Koran says nothing about bathing suits, and I bet plenty of Muslim women who wear burkahs use Western bathing suits in public.
  17. #12
    Join Date Dec 2008
    Location Liverpool, UK
    Posts 689
    Rep Power 22

    Default

    Well then the less the better. Besides the law says no swimming with clothes on--the fact that the clothes have some sort of fancy name doesn't make them any less "clothes."


    Do you really expect French pool attendants to follow the exotic swimwear fashions of Dubai?

    She's an attention whore--nothing more.
    I hate to be the token anti-theist, but more important than her right to wear clothes that cover her as a symbol of subjugation, is the fact that she shouldn't have to wear such things at all. The Burka, whether tight or loose fitting, in a pool or outside of a pool has only one function and that is to mark women as different to men - different and subordinate.

    What is curious about the hijab/burka/etc. is that it appears innocent until you articulate it, with what other words could you descirbe something that covers women but not men, that exists to ensure women are not exposed to males, other than sexist and misogynistic?

    When women in Iran are imprisoned for 'inproper' veiling by the Pardaran and feminists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir are greeted with acid to their faces when they mobilise for secularism and against veiling, this story is an afront to those people. The left has for too long defended and often tailed backward religious ideas, nobody here should be defending this.
  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to h0m0revolutionary For This Useful Post:


  19. #13
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location Florida
    Posts 10,555
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Why Dubai? The woman is French.
    That's where she bought the thing.

    and had bought the swimsuit in Dubai so that she would not have to uncover herself to go swimming.

    And:
    Originally Posted by h0m0revolutionary
    What is curious about the hijab/burka/etc. is that it appears innocent until you articulate it, with what other words could you descirbe something that covers women but not men, that exists to ensure women are not exposed to males, other than sexist and misogynistic?
    I agree here. I think the entire thing smacks of sexism.
  20. #14
    Join Date Apr 2002
    Location Northern Europe
    Posts 11,176
    Organisation
    NTL
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What a ridiculous outfit. Even Victorian bathing suits showed more skin. What's the point in going swimming if you're going to wear pretty much the exact same thing you wear when not?
    Because it has to do with their religious beliefs douche bag.

    Well then the less the better. Besides the law says no swimming with clothes on--the fact that the clothes have some sort of fancy name doesn't make them any less "clothes."
    The fact is this has nothing to do with sanitation or whatever. France is an extreamly racist and discriminatory country, this is'nt the first time muslims have been attacked legally in france. I think its great this gets attention, THIS is real racism (religious descrimination actually), much worse than some comedian loosing his temper and calling a black heckler a nigger, which gets a bunch of attention.

    Do you really expect French pool attendants to follow the exotic swimwear fashions of Dubai?

    She's an attention whore--nothing more.
    What do pool attendants have to do with what bathingsuits people wear?

    The left has for too long defended and often tailed backward religious ideas, nobody here should be defending this.
    No, but we DO defend peoples rights to practice their own religion and we do not defend racist or discriminatory laws, even against religions we consider backward.

    I hate to be the token anti-theist, but more important than her right to wear clothes that cover her as a symbol of subjugation, is the fact that she shouldn't have to wear such things at all.
    This has nothing to do with theism or anti-theism. She is CHOOSING to wear this thing, in this case. People should have that right.

    Baths are for washing yourself, not lying in fully clothed.
    Its a swimming pool.

    This is just another case of France being discriminatory and racist.
  21. #15
    Join Date Jun 2007
    Posts 398
    Rep Power 16

    Post

    I hate to be the token anti-theist, but more important than her right to wear clothes that cover her as a symbol of subjugation, is the fact that she shouldn't have to wear such things at all. The Burka, whether tight or loose fitting, in a pool or outside of a pool has only one function and that is to mark women as different to men - different and subordinate.

    What is curious about the hijab/burka/etc. is that it appears innocent until you articulate it, with what other words could you descirbe something that covers women but not men, that exists to ensure women are not exposed to males, other than sexist and misogynistic?

    When women in Iran are imprisoned for 'inproper' veiling by the Pardaran and feminists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir are greeted with acid to their faces when they mobilise for secularism and against veiling, this story is an afront to those people. The left has for too long defended and often tailed backward religious ideas, nobody here should be defending this.
    What a load of crap. Many Muslim women wear the hijab of their own volition, and they should be allowed to do so. It's a piece of clothing. I know many well educated and very independent Muslim women who wear the hijab. If I were to suggest they were being suppressed by men, I'd get slapped across the face. In fact it's becoming a mixed fashion and political statement. Muslim women who have never before worn the hijab have taken to wearing it as a show of defiance against the racist and Islamophobic governments in Europe. That's what the demonization of Muslim people has achieved; an increased interest among the Muslim population in their faith. I laugh because I know the governments and media would get better results if they just shut the fuck up about it.

    We have a controversial (Derided for speaking out against the occupation of Iraq, and the right of the Iraqi people to self defence) Muslim leftist social worker and politician in this country. She wears the hijab (much derided for this as well of course) and was asked what she thought of Iranian "forced hijab". She answered that if she lived in Iran she, as a show of defiance against the Iranian government, probably wouldn't wear the hijab.

    Now I don't care what people wear, they should be free to wear whatever the fuck they want. And that's the key point here, in Iran people are not allowed to wear what they want. That should be struggled against. In France, as civilised, modern and up to date as it's supposed to be, people are also not allowed to wear what they want. This too should be struggled against.

    So in my opinion, leftists certainly should defend her right to wear what she wants. If there was a genuine problem with hygiene, then of course it should be considered. IMO, it's total bullshit. The connection between this case and the Islamophobia abound in French society is obvious.

    As for the burqini or whatever the hell you want to call it, it looks perfectly fine. I remember reading an article in a bourgeois newspaper about a female Muslim lifeguard who was wearing the same thing. It's just a swimsuit covering the whole body. Yeah it's weird, but who gives a shit how people get their kicks. You want laws against "attention whores" now?

    Found a website that makes 'em:

    http://www.ahiida.com/index.php?a=subcats&cat=20



    EDIT: Very nice post RGacky3, I'd thank you if I could.
  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Nakidana For This Useful Post:


  23. #16
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Location quebec,canada
    Posts 5,570
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    hoo well, i never wanted to support discrimination, its just that personally, i think religions have nothing to do in public places, and if i remember this Pool is a public place.

    anyway, this is my opinion, and i am glad to hear yours.
    WHY kléber, WHY!!!!!!!
  24. #17
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location Florida
    Posts 10,555
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What a load of crap. Many Muslim women wear the hijab of their own volition, and they should be allowed to do so. It's a piece of clothing. I know many well educated and very independent Muslim women who wear the hijab.
    Sure and some Muslim women are also talked into being suicide bombers. And there are places where Muslims bomb schools for girls and throw acid in girls faces so they don't ever try to become educated and independent.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7724505.stm
  25. #18
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Location quebec,canada
    Posts 5,570
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    sure and some muslim women are also talked into being suicide bombers. And there are places where muslims bomb schools for girls and throw acid in girls faces so they don't ever try to become educated and independent.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7724505.stm
    nononono bub no!
    WHY kléber, WHY!!!!!!!
  26. #19
    Join Date Jul 2007
    Location Melbourne, Australia
    Posts 2,208
    Organisation
    ex-Leninist sectoid
    Rep Power 33

    Default

    Wow the amount of white liberal chauvinism in this thread is ridiculous. Yes, burqas and hijabs in the Islamic religion is subjugation, but by banning "burkinis", it doesn't mean Muslim women are gonna start wearing Western bathing suits, since many quite devoutly follow those religious practices you're basically barring them from enjoying swimming pools. Argue against these ideas rather than just banning them, you're making life for Muslim women in the West even harder.
    And when Marx says, 'Hitherto the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways', what that 'hitherto' means is not a renunciation of theory and that all we need to do is wade in with our fists and there will be no more need for thought. This idea is in fact fascist, and it would be grossly unjust to Marx to impute such views on him.
    --Theodor Adorno, 'On Theory and Practice'
  27. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to RHIZOMES For This Useful Post:


  28. #20
    Join Date Sep 2008
    Location Occupied Cascadia
    Posts 392
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I hate to be the token anti-theist, but more important than her right to wear clothes that cover her as a symbol of subjugation, is the fact that she shouldn't have to wear such things at all. The Burka, whether tight or loose fitting, in a pool or outside of a pool has only one function and that is to mark women as different to men - different and subordinate.

    What is curious about the hijab/burka/etc. is that it appears innocent until you articulate it, with what other words could you descirbe something that covers women but not men, that exists to ensure women are not exposed to males, other than sexist and misogynistic?

    When women in Iran are imprisoned for 'inproper' veiling by the Pardaran and feminists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir are greeted with acid to their faces when they mobilise for secularism and against veiling, this story is an afront to those people. The left has for too long defended and often tailed backward religious ideas, nobody here should be defending this.
    What the hell is this?

    Forcing someone to show more skin than they're comfortable with is as bad if not worse than stopping them from doing so.

    I'm not even muslim and sometimes I wear a hijab as a symbol of defiance or just not wanting to be ogled. :/
  29. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Kukulofori For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Muslim women in India have started to fight
    By Vargha Poralli in forum Anti-Discrimination
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st July 2007, 05:41
  2. muslim women in australia
    By rioters bloc in forum Anti-Discrimination
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15th September 2006, 15:27
  3. Women Still Dying In "free" Muslim World
    By fridabella in forum Newswire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 7th October 2004, 20:15
  4. HINDU-MUSLIM VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
    By redstar2000 in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 22nd February 2004, 01:10
  5. the muslim veil - "it protects us from ugly women"
    By ArgueEverything in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 25th April 2002, 21:56

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts