Results 81 to 83 of 83
Only if they're doing something horrifically wrong.
So you damage your penis in order to prevent it being damaged? That's insane. It's like bashing in your new car with a sledgehammer in case you crash it.
It's not a huge issue to me because no demented parody of a medical professional ever saw fit to slice up my genitals. For the most part it's a non-issue to me because a cricumcision I went through would be voluntary (unless of course I ever had to be under anaesthetic near some of those whackjob surgeons in america that do it to you regardless of what procedure you're actually undergoing) but a lot of people aren't so lucky having been mutilated either before they were able to give informed consent or, as paranthetically mentioned above, whilst simply unable to make an informed choice.
Fuck circumcision and the horse it rode in on.
Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.
[FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]
"Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.
Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
Seconding this.
Causing unnecessary pain to a child isn't desirable. That being said, it's also not a "big deal" that it happened, to me and others. I would say it shouldn't be done now, though. There is just not significant enough evidence either way. And in the absence of compelling evidence, how about making not cutting people the default position?
The idea of being uncircumcised does seem weird to me. But I've always known my little guy the way he is. If my friend came up to me with a new hair cut, I'd be a little put off too. I think it's appealing to think "the way we are is best." So people circumscribed like me might want to believe it's better. I'd say there is no big difference either way, and you've already had the procedure. Don't worry, be happy.
I think we are essentially trying to debate who's dick is medically superior here. Everyone wants the answer to be their own.