what would Che say?

[Guardia Bolivariano]

What would Che think of the present day latinamerican guerrilla movements like ,the farc ,eln ,tupamaros ,sendero luminoso and the central american rebels?

[new democracy]

tupamros(from uruguay if i am not mistaken)didn't became a legal political party?

[Guardia Bolivariano]

I'M TALKING ABOUT THE VENEZUELAN TUPAMAROS THEY WERE FORMED AS AN URBAN GUERRILLA MOVEMENT YEARS AGO AND NOW THEY'RE GROWING IN NUMBERS AGAIN CAUSE OF THE VENEZUELAN REVOLUTION.

[honest intellectual]

I think Che would be plesed. Latin America is swinging to the left. Even the cappies on this site agree that there is a chance of a communist Latin America soon. There is a genuine revolutionary zeal among the rebels, a genuine desire to free people from capitalism

[jpcupp]

Che mentions marulanda ,of the farc-ep and camillio toress in his two three many vietnams speech. he fully supprted them. he sould be very cautious in supporting hugo chavez,a s chavez is a bourgiesie nationalist that preeches progressive capitalism not socialism.che would suppor the sendinaro,as he was very very very fond of mao.remember while he had respect for salvador allende, he felt the mir line to be more correct,as has been shown. i think my bolivarian comrade, he would be very happy witht eh bolivarian movment, but he would be leary of its ability to stand the test of time with out the dictaotorship of the workers and peasants to suptres the fascist countyr sellers. i have laready suggested earlier that while i think che would support fidel, that ideologically he thinks much more similar to the norht korean line of "juche"he would no doubt support mugabe,some what libya somewhat,he would be exicted for lawrence kabilla . to bad the usa offed hiim. fucking dogs. anyway. in burkana faso their is a stlinist/hoxhaist movment i think they would have considered him and adventurist, but i think he would have tired to gcreate a unitied front with them anyway. the phipline armed struggle is mostly maoist, but prof. sison, their head, has expressed several times that while he has many disagreements with che's theory(mostly his military thoeroy that is to be honest wrong on a few key points), that he is in resepect for che's example. the world needs armed national liberaion movement even more, now, only this time they got to stop taking peace deal and worrying about what amenesty international tells them is good.
ps. have i argued yet, that che would support milosevic!!

[Guardia Bolivariano]

It's true that the rich are very dangerous for the Bolivarian revolution but In many official visits and presidential decisions president Chavez has said he has diferences with capitalism and all It's forms.The reason he cannot do as other revolutionaty states is because he needs do make a peacefull revolution first by creating the basis for an even more revolutionary goverment something like a combination betwen China and Cuba but never in the form of soviet states.But he cannot be called in any case a "bourgiesie nationalist" especialy wen he talks of uniting in the fight agianst globolasation and imperialism.the Venezuelan Bolivarian movement has made more progress In 3 years than the FARC and ELN in 40 years of conflict.