Thread: Marxism and the American Dream

Results 1 to 18 of 18

  1. #1
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location IL
    Posts 500
    Rep Power 0

    Default Marxism and the American Dream

    Our research paper in my American Literature class requires us to use the subject of the American Dream (i.e., a phrase referring to the supposed freedom that allows all citizens and all residents of the United States to pursue their goals in life through hard work and free choice) and to compare it to something else (an historical topic, person(s), etc.).
    I've decided to do my essay on the American Dream and compare it to Marxism. Does anyone know where I could start out on this?
    Thanks in advance.
  2. #2
    Reforge the 4th International! Committed User
    Join Date Oct 2008
    Location Ohio
    Posts 2,068
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    Well, if you have time to read The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, it's a very critical work relating to capitalism and the American Dream. It does a very nice job of showing how absurd it is. I doubt you have time, but pick the book up at some point. I honestly have no clue how old you are, but I'd be stunned if you got/get through high school without being asked to read it in English class or something.

    Either way, there's a lot of good issues that can be brought up. You can focus on race relations, such as the African American community. When the blacks were freed from slavery and allowed to become members of society, though I'd hardly call it that, they were often left with a miniscule amount of money and on rare occasion, a tiny plot of land. However, while the white community was already established and prosperous, blacks were often forced back into slavery of some sort and forced into tiresome labor to maintain themselves. Could it not be said that they were at a disadvantage that could represent the massive poverty in the black community of America? Along with the racist drug war, police brutality and racist legislation, racial communities that were forced to play catch-up with whites are now feeling that sting, as it is impossible to catch up.

    Take the immigrant community. If a Latino family comes to the United States, they are exploited by racist legislation and a lack of funds. They are forced into incredibly tiresome labor as well, as they must catch up in the already white-dominated market. Is this the American Dream? Where we have the resources to provide necessities for the people, yet we do not? Is it the American Dream where the monetary system is innately racist and persecutes minorities, forcing them to attempt to break even with the white culture?

    George Carlin said 'It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.' The American Dream is a bourgeois fabrication that convinces those who have found success that everyone can have the same success. It's a product of capitalism, which formulates incredibly sick rationalizations for its process. I'd say you should focus on racial groups in the United States, as well as poor families that are already at a disadvantage based on their standing, where they live and their low income. Best of luck.
    The basic ideas of Marxism, upon which alone a revolutionary party can be constructed, are continuous in their application and have been for a hundred years. The ideas of Marxism, which create revolutionary parties, are stronger than the parties they create, and never fail to survive their downfall. They never fail to find representatives in the old organizations to lead the work of reconstruction. These are the continuators of the tradition, the defenders of the orthodox doctrine. The task of the uncorrupted revolutionists, obliged by circumstances to start the work of organizational reconstruction, has never been to proclaim a new revelation – there has been no lack of such Messiahs, and they have all been lost in the shuffle – but to reinstate the old program and bring it up to date.
    - James P. Cannon, 'The Degeneration of the Communist Party'
  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kassad For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location IL
    Posts 500
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Well, if you have time to read The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald,
    Funnily enough that's the book we just finished reading. I didn't care for it as much as other books due to how everything in that story appears to be a metaphor, part of some overall concept about the Dream (but through it all that's probably what makes it a classic book and there were certain parts of it I like).

    it's a very critical work relating to capitalism and the American Dream. It does a very nice job of showing how absurd it is.
    I didn't exactly perceive it as that, to me it was simply rich people acting like rich people stereotypically do: condescending, selfish, just being pricks to each other. Is there any specific part(s) of the story that you could point out as being a critique of capitalism and the American Dream?

    George Carlin said 'It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.'
    Indeed, that's actually the first thing that pops into my head whenever I hear about the American Dream. George Carlin's the best.

    The American Dream is a bourgeois fabrication that convinces those who have found success that everyone can have the same success. It's a product of capitalism, which formulates incredibly sick rationalizations for its process.
    An excellent way of putting it.

    I'd say you should focus on racial groups in the United States, as well as poor families that are already at a disadvantage based on their standing, where they live and their low income. Best of luck.
    I was actually originally going to write about racial inequality, but then I shifted my focus from that to Marxism. So I'm kind of stuck between which two to write on. However, writing on racial groups does have less of an abstractness to it in that it's a societal issue within capitalism. I can probably write more on that than on Marxism because the former really attacks the fabrication of lies the supposed Dream is based on while the latter is a critique of the system itself.
  5. #4
    Reforge the 4th International! Committed User
    Join Date Oct 2008
    Location Ohio
    Posts 2,068
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    Your teacher must be absolutely atrocious. He/she didn't even reference the entire underlying concept of the story. Daisy symbolizes wealth that people are conditioned to believe they can obtain in America. Tom symbolizes the snobbish rich, who really do nothing to obtain their wealth, but still wind up wealthy and act like no one else matters, despite the fact that they may have been in the same spot as the downtrodden are in currently. Gatsby symbolizes people that lie and cheat to obtain wealth, as he managed an underground bootlegging business. Despite all of this, in the end, his lies and deceit prove that he did not truly love Daisy, nor did Tom, but that they both wished to merely have possession of her, much like Americans do not truly obtain material goods for the sake of their passion, but for the sake of the status of ownership. Daisy embraces Tom once more, as wealth does not discriminate based on honor or merit and often rewards those who do not deserve it. Gatsby is killed in the process of his crusade for happiness, when in truth, it was and always will be totally unattainable. Make more sense?

    I think Marxism is incredibly broad in contrast to the topic at hand. I'm sure you can factor some key points in, but focus on the racial inequality.
    The basic ideas of Marxism, upon which alone a revolutionary party can be constructed, are continuous in their application and have been for a hundred years. The ideas of Marxism, which create revolutionary parties, are stronger than the parties they create, and never fail to survive their downfall. They never fail to find representatives in the old organizations to lead the work of reconstruction. These are the continuators of the tradition, the defenders of the orthodox doctrine. The task of the uncorrupted revolutionists, obliged by circumstances to start the work of organizational reconstruction, has never been to proclaim a new revelation – there has been no lack of such Messiahs, and they have all been lost in the shuffle – but to reinstate the old program and bring it up to date.
    - James P. Cannon, 'The Degeneration of the Communist Party'
  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kassad For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Location UK
    Posts 3,845
    Organisation
    SWP (UK)
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    There's a really good essay by G.A. Cohen in a collection of essays on freedom called The Liberty Reader (edited by David Miller) on the nature of social mobility and freedom under capitalism that you should read if you want to get a more analytical viewpoint in the issues. The essay itself is called 'Capitalism, Freedom, and the Proletariat' and you should be able to get the book fairly easily, it's not only good for that essay, it also has lots of other good stuff that I've used several times in the past for my own essays.
  8. The Following User Says Thank You to BobKKKindle$ For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Location Oakland, California
    Posts 8,151
    Rep Power 164

    Default

    The old American dream of Jeffersonian America was for everyone to be small business owners and free farmers who owned their own small plots of land. The period of depressions starting with the one of the 1870 and then the 1930s pretty much wiped out small farmers and created huge monopolies.

    The American dream post WWII was no longer based on the fantasy of family farms and family businesses; it was replaced by a new myth that every working class American (who's not black) can own their own home and car and have their own little autonomy in that little box even if they have to be a worker their entire lives.

    Funny, the new depression and the housing collapse is linked to the myth of this dream. Just as the Midwestern farmers saw their dream dry up and blow away in the dust-bowl, now Midwestern suburban Americans are watching their home-based equity dry up and blow away like a black blizzard.
  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jimmie Higgins For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date Sep 2005
    Posts 3,880
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    You may want note Frederick Taylor and that scientific management didn't lead to higher wages through greater efficiency as he theorized (that would be part of the American dream) yet that very greater efficiency brought workers and capitalists into even greater class struggle as capitalists use that efficiency for greater rates of profits at the expense of workers that sparked large strikes over the rate of production.
  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Psy For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date Mar 2009
    Posts 1
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What's worrying about the American Dream, or the Western world as a whole, is that it's in-built in the system that there are loosers or winners, and insinuates that the more unfortunate somehow didn't work hard enough or made the wrong choices, and that they are to be given little support.
  14. #9
    Join Date Dec 2007
    Location US
    Posts 95
    Organisation
    N/A
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    I always thought the whole, "all men are created equal" line paired up well with Marx's vision for a classless society. meaning that some Marx actually made more sense in terms of the American dream then how it really played out, even if you do end up using racism instead, that line still hits deep with a lot of people and may make Marxism less alien to anyone who listens
    "dissent is the highest form of patriotism."-trying to figure that out

    "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it"-Abraham Lincoln
  15. #10
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 1,632
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    OK, I know this is a pretty random suggestion, but you should really see if there's any way you can get a book called New Perspectives on American Politics by Lawrence C. Dodd, for the chapter "The Significance of Class in American History and Politics" by John F. Manley. It's choc full of quotes from the founding fathers, through Lincoln, through the New Deal and up to the Reagan era; all from a class perspective. Really, really good stuff.

    Another really helpful book would be Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do by Studs Terkel. Very appropriate for an English essay.

    Some DVDs you could watch would be Harlan County, U.S.A., Matewan, Salt of the Earth and, yes, Norma Rae (I make no apologies for the last suggestion).

    This might be helpful too: http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/index.html
  16. The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyJazz For This Useful Post:


  17. #11
    Join Date May 2008
    Location not Dallas, TX
    Posts 2,024
    Organisation
    Citizens Against Rational Decisions
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I'd recommend The Grapes of Wrath. Not only because it very much deals with the emotion tied to the end of the small-farmer Jeffersonian 'dream,' as Gravedigger pointed to, but also that it deals with people pretty 'Red' especially by today's standards.

    Also, "Hard Work" doesn't reward shit. The capitalist system is based on getting as much compensation for as little work as possible. 99% of people who are working hard for a living are not doing it out of free choice. I'd recommend looking at the first wave of organizers who saw through the BS, those who stuck in solidarity to get things like a work-week and invented the weekend.

    There is so much history of, maybe not Marxist, but certainly working-class militancy here in the US that most people who speak of the dream like to ignore completely. But yes racism is certainly worth bringing up, but I'd be wary of depending on it solely.

    The American Dream is just such a bullshit phrase; Best of luck in tearing that phrase a new one!
    Well I'm lookin real hard and I'm trying to find a job but it just keeps gettin tougher every day
  18. The Following User Says Thank You to TheCultofAbeLincoln For This Useful Post:


  19. #12
    Reforge the 4th International! Committed User
    Join Date Oct 2008
    Location Ohio
    Posts 2,068
    Rep Power 43

    Default

    The old American dream of Jeffersonian America was for everyone to be small business owners and free farmers who owned their own small plots of land. The period of depressions starting with the one of the 1870 and then the 1930s pretty much wiped out small farmers and created huge monopolies.
    I disagree with this. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and every other piece of the earliest American call for independence was written and approved by rich, white landowners. No one at the Constitutional Convention was a poor farmer like most of the country. No one was representing African Americans. The nation wasn't founded for a bunch of people to go get rich. It was founded so the elite group that had wealth could maintain it. There was hardly any sympathy for working farmers in those rooms. It was the equivalent of the executives from Coca-Cola, General Motors, McDonalds and Verizon gathering in a room and deciding what's best for the country. They're not going to demand what's best for us, but instead, work to preserve their money.
    The basic ideas of Marxism, upon which alone a revolutionary party can be constructed, are continuous in their application and have been for a hundred years. The ideas of Marxism, which create revolutionary parties, are stronger than the parties they create, and never fail to survive their downfall. They never fail to find representatives in the old organizations to lead the work of reconstruction. These are the continuators of the tradition, the defenders of the orthodox doctrine. The task of the uncorrupted revolutionists, obliged by circumstances to start the work of organizational reconstruction, has never been to proclaim a new revelation – there has been no lack of such Messiahs, and they have all been lost in the shuffle – but to reinstate the old program and bring it up to date.
    - James P. Cannon, 'The Degeneration of the Communist Party'
  20. #13
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Location Oakland, California
    Posts 8,151
    Rep Power 164

    Default

    I disagree with this. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and every other piece of the earliest American call for independence was written and approved by rich, white landowners. No one at the Constitutional Convention was a poor farmer like most of the country. No one was representing African Americans. The nation wasn't founded for a bunch of people to go get rich. It was founded so the elite group that had wealth could maintain it. There was hardly any sympathy for working farmers in those rooms. It was the equivalent of the executives from Coca-Cola, General Motors, McDonalds and Verizon gathering in a room and deciding what's best for the country. They're not going to demand what's best for us, but instead, work to preserve their money.
    Well first of all, this was largely a myth just as the post-war "we're all middle class and everyone can own a home" American dream is a myth and that was the point I was trying to make.

    However, the American revolutionaries were bourgeois revolutionaries and there was a left and a right of this revolution from people like Hamilton who wanted a new monarch to people like Tom Paine. People like Jefferson believed that a citizenry of small business people and independent family farmers would be the way to have a "free" society. It's true that their main interest was that of the elite, but these guys were not aristocrats in the Feudal sense, they were merchants and landowning bourgeois.

    This was before industrialization and most business was actually small with one boss and a few workers or an apprentice. Of course 30 years on with he bourgeois in power and then industrialization happening, this myth could no longer pretend to represent reality as business firms grew bigger and began turning the apprentices and semi-skilled trades people and the poor into the industrial working class.
  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jimmie Higgins For This Useful Post:


  22. #14
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 2,195
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The American Dream and Race is a good one, here's an essay my housemate did for her University course that I gave her a hand with... Still had it on my laptop

    The American Dream
    XXXXXXX. VS Year 1 CrS unit 2
    23/02/09


    The American Dream is the freedom that allows all citizens of the United States to pursue their goals in life through hard work and free choice. The American Dream is such an open ended statement, leaving so many interperetations at your disposal. As American citezens or 'residential alliens' (Immigrants with a green card or visa) you are promised this, a right to equality, freedom of speech freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly and freedom of petition. And this I would consider is the basis of the basic American dream. This is a very romanticised view of life in the United States, [as Malcolm X once professed] "22 million black victims of Americanism" have been hindered by the practical reality of living in the USA. Illistrating that the view and actions of thier 'fellow Americans' may not reflect the supposedly colour blind nature of the American dream. These apparent contradictions are illuminated by the film 'Get on the Bus' produced and directed by Spike Lee which addresses the idea of black people seeking attonement in 1995 during 'The Million Man March'.

    W.E.B Du Bois was the first Afro-American to graduate from Harvard, despite having succeded in a time where race divide was even more stringent than it still is today Du Bois still remained a fierce critic of American society. Similarly a hundred years later another even more succesful Black American, Spike Lee produced and directed 'Get on the Bus' and yet even after such a long time manages to have the same criticisms towards American society posing the question, is it acctualy a practical assumption to beleive in a collective and attainable goal of the American dream. Taking the fact that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin by federal and state governments, and the film in question was based in 1995, where Black Americans were still marching for equal opportunities I wouldn't tend to believe that it is.

    Taking my opening statements into consideration I wanted to research a source which focuses on a similar view as mentioned above, a set of basic human rights. Having lived in the United States for the majority of my life I would say that 'my American dream' is probably similar to that of most people who have ever studied as a young child at an American school, one of equality, despite race, gender, age, social status or sexual orientation. I am very interested in the civil rights movement and racial equality, which led me to the film 'Get on the Bus' about a group of African-American men who are taking a cross-country bus trip in order to participate in the Million Man March. Along the way, the men get to know each other and discuss various topics including their personal lives, ambitions and political beliefs.

    The variation of characters and thier respective reasons for traveling to the march are, I think one of the main points of interest in the film. They range from a simple bus driver who organised the trip, to an actor, a father son pair, an ex-gang member turned devout muslim, to a gay couple, an aspiring film director [fondly refered to as Spike Lee Jr.] and a conspiracy theorist who believes the march is a plot to congrigate large numbers of Afro-Americans so they can all be killed, and many more. All members of the cast have thier own reasons for attending the march, the only link being a dream they think that will be fufilled along the way.

    Spike Lee, often seen as a demagogue who increases the gulf in race devide and tailors it to his own means, seems to create rifts between differences in each characters reasons for attending. This furthur shows just how far the majority of the minorities are to recieving the equal rights 'promised' in the American dream. For instance during the film the bus breaks down and a new driver is sent, a caucasian man of jewish faith. These people supposedly on thier way to march for equal rights have no hesitations in critising and making anti-semetic comments about another "ingredient in the mixing pot". Brawls between counter-cultures ensue throughout the film. Turning one man against the next due to just another stereotype or prejudice. Again making my point that even in the most open of minds, or the place you least suspect equal rights, or atleast true belief in them is a goal we have long yet reached.

    In today's society, over 10 years on from the million man march, and many more from abolition of slavery, civil rights are still a questionable reality. In even as recent as 2000, voters rights were compromised in the presidential election, due to a complicated ballot design and a ruling by a primarily republican supreme court both over and undervotes were not counted in the election. This lead to a miniscule difference in numbers, making it one of the closest votes in the history of the country. The government knowing full well the importance of every voice ruled out a re-count, reiterating my point that every voice couldn't be heard, yet another violation of this American dream [of free speech]. An American comic [George Carlin] was quoted saying "It's called the American dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it!"

    In the film, at times, the characters seem to have given up on the American dream. There are alot of references to African culture, Lee seems to ignore the idea of American identity, and procurs affinity with ideas of African identity, for instance they play alot of african drums [bongos] use references such as chief and villages. Also the old man in the film is refered to as Pop. This presents ideas of different shared values amongst Afro-Americans. Stokely Charmical started an Africa movement in the 1960's where the nation of Islam were arguing for a redistribution of land to create a seperate black state [founded upon different ideals than the American founding fathers held true and self evident]. Yet again this proves that a so called land of equality is still after so many attempts at Civil Rights failing to deliver us this American dream.

    In conclusion the American dream whilst heald to be universal and colour blind has systematically failed over centuries, proving unable to permiate deepset racial and social inequalities in American society.
  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Sugar Hill Kevis For This Useful Post:


  24. #15
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location Florida
    Posts 357
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    the racism and sexism of America still casts a pall over the illusory American Dream that really was only used to create a mythology to recruit people to move to America and make the underclass of surplus labor for the capitalists
    In this direction it is precisely the Marxist-Leninists who must be the most capable, the most wide-awake, the best organizers in order to become the subjective factor of the leadership of the revolution. In no way should we proceed from the idea that the conditions are not yet ripe for the revolution, or that the revolution cannot break out in the developed capitalist countries, therefore, we have to wait for it to develop in those states or continents in which the oppression, the forms and methods of exploitation are allegedly different from those in the metropolises. The working class and the Marxist-Leninist parties of the metropolises ought to give the peoples of various countries great aid, should assist their revolutionary movements. - Enver Hoxha The Marxist-Leninist Movement and the World Crisis of Capitalism
  25. #16
    Join Date Apr 2008
    Location South Wales
    Posts 83
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    [FONT=&quot]“Class in [/FONT]America[FONT=&quot]: Myths and Realities” by Gregory Mantsios.

    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]"Growing Up Class-Conscious"[/FONT][FONT=&quot] By Howard Zinn[/FONT]

    Both very good essays regarding class and the American Dream. I have them saved if you want them
  26. #17
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Location IL
    Posts 500
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I know it's been awhile since school's been out and everything, but I just thought I'd share the final product that I managed to ace. Keep in mind that the paper was limited to five pages so I didn't get to add in everything I wanted, but... here it is:

    [FONT=Times New Roman]The American Nightmare: The Reality of Racism in the United States[/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman]“No, I'm not an American. I'm one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of Americanism. One of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy. So, I'm not standing here speaking to you as an American, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver--no, not I. I'm speaking as a victim of this American system. And I see America through the eyes of the victim. I don't see any American dream; I see an American nightmare.” (Malcolm X)[/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman]The American Dream is the supposed freedom that allows American citizens[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]- regardless of race, sex, or class--to pursue their goals in life through hard work and free choice; however, when comparing the idea to the reality of American society, it can safely be said that this concept known as the American Dream is nothing but a romanticized view of American society as made evident by the lives of African Americans and other racial minorities.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]When first analyzing the idea known as the American Dream--sometimes re-[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]ferred to as simply “the Dream”--it is necessary to understand the history of the United States itself. With its roots in the signing of the Declaration of Independence by the colonists participating in the Continental Congress, it can be said that the idea of the Dream is summarized in the beginning of the document: that all men are created equally and are endowed with inalienable rights, including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” However, the Declaration already contradicted itself with the reality of American political and social life at the time, dominated by land-owning white males, along with the fact that at the time of the foundation of the United States the slave population was around to half a million. (Steven Mintz) Many founders, including Benjamin Franklin, were utterly opposed to slavery. Nonetheless, when Thomas Jefferson finished the first draft of the Declaration that included a paragraph condemning the continuation of the slave trade, delegates from both southern and northern states objected to its inclusion and eventually omitted it (Foley, 813). [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]Basically, the American Dream divided two different camps--those who were pro-slavery, and those who held abolitionist tendencies--that both had different interpretations of what (and who) the American Dream could include. From then until the end of the American Civil War in 1865, black slaves were denied any opportunity of living this Dream of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and were conditioned during the post-Civil War and Reconstruction years to miserable conditions with little rights even after slavery. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]The Civil Rights era that began decades later to the end of the Civil War promoted very progressive domestic changes to the lives of oppressed groups, including African-Americans, Latin-Americans, American Indians, women, and homosexuals. Challenging the status quo was brought out through methods varying from peaceful protest and civil disobedience to civil unrest and all-out rebellion. For African-Americans specifically, the civil rights movement held roots with the inherited disadvantages of growing up as a black person in the post-Reconstruction United States. When viewed retrospectively nearly all historians have concluded that Reconstruction--referring to the policies in the post-Civil War U.S. which held the purpose of reforms that would provide equality for former slaves--was a failure (McPherson, 481). Specifically, a system based on institutional racism was implemented in the South in the post-Reconstruction years to as early as 1965, known as the Jim Crow laws, which were enforced by southern state and local authorities in order to maintain segregation policies that were present in all public facilities on a “separate but equal” status. Other characteristics of society’s racist norms were the economic exploitation of blacks and other minorities, and the mass racial violence against minorities in their respective geographical settings (one major example being the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization founded in 1865 by Confederate veterans). One race riot that took place in August 1908--in the midst of a time when racial tensions were very high--in Springfield, Illinois resulted in the organization of the NAACP. (Krohe 1973) In essence, no real “American Dream” could be lived out by African-Americans as they were constantly terrorized and harassed by the general public, as well as being put in a severe economic disadvantage that converted their lives from that of slavery to wage slavery. To say that the abolition of slavery by itself led on to more improved lives for former slaves should therefore be considered historically incorrect, and that the civil rights movement led by the oppressed people themselves against an institutionally racist society held much higher overall progress for true equality than normal government policy ever could. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]In the first half of the twentieth century, one of the most influential civil rights activists was W.E.B. Du Bois, was the first African-American to earn a PhD in 1895 from Harvard University (Du Bois 132-53). Besides being involved in the demand for civil rights, he was always a strong adherent to the philosophy known as Pan-Africanism, a philosophy which advocates for the unification of native Africans and the African Diaspora. Another adherent to Pan-Africanism was Marcus Garvey, an early black nationalist orator. He probably best describes the concept of Pan-Africanism in this quote: “Our union must know no clime, boundary, or nationality… let us hold together under all climes and in every country…” (Amy Jacques-Garvey 1986) When viewed in context with the idea of the American Dream, it can easily be said that neither Pan-Africanists nor Black Nationalists actually see an American Dream that is attainable in a country founded on such racism and inequality, and that the alternative to peaceful protest for reform was black self-determination. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]Nevertheless, prominent African-Americans that subscribed to such beliefs [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]did not fail to harbor appreciation from later peaceful reform civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King, Jr. (Hynes). King’s work to end racial segregation and discrimination in a racially-divided United States through non-violent methods such as civil disobedience still makes him an icon to this day and continues to have an overall legacy that provokes the famous events of sit-ins, boycotts, newly racially-integrated schools and other public places, and of course the 1963 March on Washington. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]Another leading leader during the tumultuous period in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s was Malcolm X, one of the chief spokesmen for the Nation of Islam. Although both men could be seen as highly influential public oratory speakers, King and Malcolm X each had different methods in approaching the racism problem: while the former advocated for peaceful protest, the latter stressed the futility of the “integrationist program” and argued that “there was no precedent for the absorption of Negroes into the greater white American mainstream in fact or in history.” (Spellman)[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]While each of these men had their share of differences when approaching racial inequality in the United States--between integration and self-determination--both shared the view that there was a huge racial divide in this country that, as made evident by the quote at the beginning of this paper, made any kind of idea like the American Dream unrealistic. There was no equal opportunity for “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” when entire racial minority groups that lived well below the poverty line had to fight to survive in order to obtain “life” itself. The civil rights movement promoted revolutionary ideas of racial equality and justice as well as influencing later civil rights leaders and groups such as Huey P. Newton of the Black Panther Party in the 1970s.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman]In conclusion, the American Dream’s existence can be disproven and in fact can be labeled the exact opposite--The American Nightmare--given the past history and the reality of the lives in which African-Americans and other racial minorities live in. Even in the twenty-first century studies have shown that the average black family’s income is little more than half of a white one family’s. (NPR) A more “white-sounding” name is more likely to get one hired to a job than a “black-sounding” one (Bertrand). When compared to reality, the American Dream is nothing but an absurd, if not outright false, idea, a bourgeois fabrication that convinces those who have found success that everyone can have the same success. With the history of slavery, segregation, and discrimination--along with the racist drug war, police brutality and racist legislation--racial communities were forced and are still being forced to play catch-up with whites, and are now feeling that sting, as it is impossible to catch up. But just looking at the lives of not only African-Americans specifically, but racial minorities in general, as well as immigrants and the working class as a whole, exposes the myth that is The Dream. As George Carlin once famously said, “It’s called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.”[/FONT]
  27. #18
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 1,632
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    You forgot to mention that Du Bois was a Bolshevik!
    Originally Posted by Martin Luther King, Jr.
    We cannot talk of Dr. Du Bois without recognizing that he was a radical all of his life. Some people would like to ignore the fact that he was a Communist in his later years. It is worth noting that Abraham Lincoln warmly welcomed the support of Karl Marx during the Civil War and corresponded with him freely. In contemporary life, the English speaking world has no difficulty with the fact that Sean O'Casey was a literary giant of the twentieth century and a Communist, or that Pablo Neruda is generally considered the greatest living poet though he also served in the Chilean Senate as a Communist. It is time to cease muting the fact that Dr. Du Bois was a genius and chose to be a Communist. Our irrational obsessive anti-communism has led us into too many quagmires to be retained as if it were a mode of scientific thinking. …Dr. Du Bois' greatest virtue was his committed empathy with all the oppressed and his divine dissatisfaction with all forms of injustice.
    Good essay, I think you probably took the right angle on it with racism.
  28. The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyJazz For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Is the American Dream over?
    By Psy in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 5th September 2009, 14:33
  2. American dream vs. Democratic Socialist dream...
    By RadioRaheem84 in forum Learning
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13th April 2008, 18:49
  3. The American Dream
    By which doctor in forum Cultural
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31st October 2005, 02:48
  4. The American Dream
    By SittingBull47 in forum Cultural
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 18th March 2004, 14:16
  5. American Dream
    By Politix in forum Cultural
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4th December 2002, 03:03

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread