In the "Why is Che important anyway" thread, a long and exhausting discussion of Jesus vs. Che began.
Basically about who was the better revolutionary.
I would just like to point something out:
Jesus, while radical for his day, actually did very little. His fans and followers have trumped up and made all his short days grand. What did Jesus THE MAN really do? I think people like to think of him as a revolutionary, but really anything revolutionary about Jesus is a result of his followers, especially Paul, and their perceptions of him. Without Paul, we would have never, ever, ever even heard about Jesus.
So Jesus blessed a few folks? So he died on a cross? This ALL IS ONLY REVOLUTIONARY IF YOU BUY THAT YOU ARE A SINNER AND GOD WANTS TO SEND YOU TO HELL!
Damn people, thought this would be obvious.
Whereas Che DID more in his life than most of us can even hope to accomplish. His contribution was HIS OWN, and it has lasted to this day in Cuba and elsewhere (we are here at Che Lives aren't we?)
CHE IS THE BETTER REVOLUTIONARY!!!
JESUS JUST HAD GOOD BIOGRAPHERS AND P.R. GUYS!!!
Power to the People,
Trance
"If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are people who want crops without ploughing the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of