Most stupid think I've ever Read! Hitler Was An Socialist.
constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/
im speechless over this site just oh just the fuck,i dont know how people can be so stupid!
If hitler was an socialist why did he promised to England that he is going to destroy socialism.
Then why would he go to Russia to destroy it
And if he was an socialist why did he was an nazi or fascist
or why when that fucker hitler came to power,why did he first shot every single Marxist,communist,socialist in Germany?
Question
Why do you think people do this?,Such lies
I dont know what is wrong with such people,people like this need to be sent to freaking Siberia or Goli Otok.
Sorry for this post but im just so pissed off,im going to go to kick a ball or beat something
Does this really surprise you? I'm sure it occurs in Europe too, but it's been common rhetoric among some of the American right-wing to equate socialism with nearly everything bad in the past- some bozo (read "CONSTITUTIONALIST" in his web address, it's usually associated with the far-right in the states) with a crappy tripod site he probably hasn't updated in years shouldn't be taken seriously.
Generally these guys will associate everything they consider to be 'left'- liberals, progressives, socialists, communists, etc. in a big bad camp along with fascists and Nazis because of some perception that they are all 'authoritarian' and therefore opposed to the liberties of the States. For these kinds of Americans this means that people like Hillary and Bill Clinton, Nanci Pelosi, and more recently Obama are in a zany socialist conspiracy plot to destroy America, as Hitler, Stalin, and others have attempted to do before.
On wikipedia there used to be a problem with some of these guys trying to put National Socialism and Fascism under the "Socialism" infobox because they said it was the same thing. A fellow (from the US, again) was spearheading this from a crappy site of his, which had the familiar bits in the right-wing here, including an ugly banner with "National Socialism- Hitler " "Marxian Socialism - Stalin and Mao" and "Democratic Socialism - *Insert US Democratic Party politician here*". Wikipedia chased him out, upon which added to the usual tirades about Wikipedia being a 'liberal' site.
Get used to seeing idiots on the internet, you'll see plenty of them. I'm sure that plenty of people act like you when they see us 'loonies' posting what we do here. ;)
(BTW, I think this belongs in websites or politics, don't see what anti-fa has to do with this)
Some people just cannot handle seeing the word "socialist" in the phrase "national socialism." These conservatives, aside from being conscious historical revisionists, do not have the brains to understand that "national socialism" was just state-supervised capitalism (for the benefit of the oppressing classes) with nationalism and rascism as the real central aspects of its ideology. The word "socialism" was just a stupid addition to the name of an ideology that was really just radical and racist nationalism.
Idiots.
When do communists and socialists ever talk about master races? We talk about a
universal and international class, but that is because the producing class (the proletariat), being the class that actually produces all the wealth on the planet,
really should be the universal and supreme class. You cannot use the same argument for race.
Read the conservative and historically revisionist stupidity:
Quote:
Question from UK Yahoo Answers
What is the difference between socialism and national socialism?
Question: Consider a person living in East Germany in the middle decades of 20th century. Before WW2 he was ruled by an oppressive bureaucracy (nazi) which tolerated no criticism or complaint, whose rule was enforced by a brutal secret police called the gestapo. After WW2 he was ruled by an oppressive bureaucracy (communist) whose rule was enforced by a brutal secret police called the stazi. Different label on the can, same content
Answer: Two halves of the same bum (bottom)! You are so right! Even the uniforms were very similar. The difference between "national" socialism and ordinary socialism - "international" socialism - was the difference between two competitive football teams. The national socialists believed that the way forward was for the "master race" to embrace socialism and impose it on everyone else - "inferior races". The international socialists believed that the way forward was for the "vanguard of the proletariat" (read shock troops of the "master class") to embrace socialism and impose it internationally on the "inferior classes" - bourgeoisie and aristocrats, etc. Frankly, it does not matter much to me whether my brains are blown out or my penis is torn off by a guy or gal who self-identifies as a member of the "master race" or as a member of the "proletariat" or as they were once known in France, as the "sans culottes". They are both fetid scum that ought to be emptied into history's trash can. Sadly, there are still these people preying on others in Havana.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090314014140AACDtYW
Idiots.
Hitler was a socialist you say?
Jesus had an illigitmate child with a T-Rex.
See? Anyone can make a complete bullsh*t statement, there's no reason to get mad about it.
I wish it were stupidity, but am inclined to believe that it is designed to sow confusion among unsophisticated folks.
I hate when people say that. It just the way I have always written: with passion.:)
Neo-nazis: Spontaniusly attacks random people, abuse them and sometimes kill them for all kinds of "reasons". They rob banks, police stations, military facilities. The trade with guns and drugs. Tend to be quite bomb happy, and blow up crowded areas (aka terrorism).
They plan and murder theire political opponents and in some cases even commit massacres. Mess ups pretty much evrything that we reds stand for.
Antifas: Try to prevent neo-nazis, and evetually destroy theire movement by targetting anyone who choose to join them. That can be in planed abuses, threatening them, expose them to the public, but never let any innocent get cought in the middle.
This leads to the abvious conclusion of.... they both use violence and are therefor equally bad.
Hitler was more of an hero than he was an socialist:
http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress...our-leader.jpgAn socialist you say? That is pretty bad... using incorrect grammar...