Quote:
My question is do they have to move their profits to a nation/country where there are low taxes or no taxes or does this even matter ?
No-one forces them to but they have to if they want to pay as little tax as possible. It's very complicated, how it all works, I found
Treasure Islands: The Men Who Stole the World by Nicholas Shaxson a good introduction on how this all works and how it has happened. It's written in an accessible manner for people (like me) who can't cope with detailed analysis of how the capitalist system works.
The example we've heard something of about this in Britain is Philip Green. According to UK Uncut "In 2005 Philip Green awarded himself £1.2bn, the biggest paycheck in British corporate history. But this dividend payout was channeled through a network of offshore accounts, via tax havens in Jersey and eventually to Green’s wife’s Monaco bank account. The dodge saved Green, and cost the tax payer, close to £300m. This tax arrangement remains in place. Any time it takes his fancy, Green can pay himself huge sums of money without having to pay any tax."
So Green moved the profit he stole from the clothing manufacturers of Asia and the consumers in Britain to his wife's account in Monaco, where they don't have to pay tax on it. It's pretty shameful that while people can be agitated about the likes of Green scamming their tax from profits generated on the UK high street there seems to be little interest when this happen in reverse, according to the Shaxson book much of the money coming into the city of London is tax evasion conducted abroad and I've not heard of any protests against this.
The source you've quoted from which says that the queen doesn't pay income tax is wrong I think. If my memory isn't shot there was a cuffuffle about this a few years ago and she agreed to start stumping some up. An article from 2002 i read on internet seems to confirm this
The problem with the queen isn't how much income tax her and her family pays (though it'd be cool for public services if they paid more), it's that they have all that capital given to them by virtue of being in the right wombs. I believe it's important when criticising the economic structure to be correct with the facts; if we try to attack the monarchy because the queen doesn't pay income tax (she does) and that poor single mothers and pensioners have to (usually they don't, I think income tax starts at £10kish which is more than the poorer pensioners get and as most poor single mothers, when they work, are working part-time this doesn't often apply to them either) then there's a danger that leftist disapproval of the monarchy can be easily dismissed in the business media as built on lies. So whoever wrote that quote you had should be more careful. When I criticise the monarchy I tend to just wonder why it's right for them to have that money and status, why they're such good friends with murdering autocrats of all kinds and that whole thing with Prince Andrew's pedo connections, I conversated with people about that when it was all over the papers.
I was gonna link to the sources I quoted (UK uncut and the queen paying income tax) but I can't yet cos I haven't done enough posting here.