• Dahal has to earn trust of other parties by offering them concessions; he is under pressure from Mohan Baidya to do the opposite
Quote:
KATHMANDU, MAY 17 -
As the deadline of the tenure of the Constituent Assembly draws close, all eyes are set on UCPN (Maoist) Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal’s “bold move” to break the deadlock in the peace and constitution drafting processes. While Dahal has to earn trust of other parties by offering them concessions, he is under intense pressure from hardliner Vice Chairman Mohan Baidya to do the opposite.
Dahal may have got his party behind him in endorsing the line of peace and constitution last month, but he faces an uphill battle inside the party to announce his “bold move” on integration of the Maoist combatants. He will most likely have to give in to the Nepali Congress’ demands for “irreversible” concessions on the integration issue.
Dahal has two challenges—-forging consensus with other parties and taking the Baidya faction into confidence on important decisions such as army integration. Given that the hardliners have a sizeable influence over the PLA, Dahal will have to carry them along. However, he has already alienated them during the last Cabinet expansion. As a result, two ministers from the Baidya faction are yet to take oath of office.
Dahal faces competing demands from within and without his party. While the Baidya faction wants agreement on outstanding issues of constitution prior to an agreement over the fate of PLA, other parties are demanding concrete steps on integration before they commit to extending the term of the Constituent Assembly. On the modality integration, the most disputed and debated issue, the hardliners prefer a separate force of PLA. Yet, they are willing to accept the idea of a mixed force as long as the leadership of the new entity is given to PLA.
Though Dahal accepts that the new constitution will be a “compromise” document, the hardliners are rigid on issues in the new constitution. “Neither the Maoists, Congress, UML or Madhesi parties can impose their will entirely. We have to find a middle path. The new constitution will have to create a win-win situation for all. That means all parties will have to compromise and adjust,” said Dahal in an interview to the Post earlier this month.
The hardliners see it differently. “The new constitution should be ‘people’s constitution’, and on the issue of state restructuring we have to follow the report of the state restructuring committee of CA”, the political document of Baidya presented in the CC reads.
A leader said Dahal is ready to create 8-10 federal states in negotiation with NC as long as it addresses issues of oppression and marginalisation, but the Baidya faction has put its foot down on 14 federal states as suggested by the majority report of the state restructuring committee. Left-leaning analyst Shyam Shrestha said Dahal can take any decision inside the party if he wishes.
“Dahal’s position inside the party can be compared to that of Girija Prasad Koirala’s position inside NC. On crucial occasions, he has shown a penchant for risk-taking, so Baidya’s position would not stop Dahal from completing the peace and constitution if he so desires,” said Shrestha.
Maoist politburo member Haribol Gajurel said Dahal is ready to take any risk for the benefit of the nation and the people. “Certainly, there are many challenges inside the party including different dissenting views, but Dahal is ready to take bold decisions that involve significant risk,” said Gajurel.
As the deadline of the tenure of the Constituent Assembly draws close, all eyes are set on UCPN (Maoist) Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal’s “bold move” to break the deadlock in the peace and constitution drafting processes. While Dahal has to earn trust of other parties by offering them concessions, he is under intense pressure from hardliner Vice Chairman Mohan Baidya to do the opposite.
Dahal may have got his party behind him in endorsing the line of peace and constitution last month, but he faces an uphill battle inside the party to announce his “bold move” on integration of the Maoist combatants. He will most likely have to give in to the Nepali Congress’ demands for “irreversible” concessions on the integration issue.
Dahal has two challenges—-forging consensus with other parties and taking the Baidya faction into confidence on important decisions such as army integration. Given that the hardliners have a sizeable influence over the PLA, Dahal will have to carry them along. However, he has already alienated them during the last Cabinet expansion. As a result, two ministers from the Baidya faction are yet to take oath of office.
Dahal faces competing demands from within and without his party. While the Baidya faction wants agreement on outstanding issues of constitution prior to an agreement over the fate of PLA, other parties are demanding concrete steps on integration before they commit to extending the term of the Constituent Assembly. On the modality integration, the most disputed and debated issue, the hardliners prefer a separate force of PLA. Yet, they are willing to accept the idea of a mixed force as long as the leadership of the new entity is given to PLA.
Though Dahal accepts that the new constitution will be a “compromise” document, the hardliners are rigid on issues in the new constitution. “Neither the Maoists, Congress, UML or Madhesi parties can impose their will entirely. We have to find a middle path. The new constitution will have to create a win-win situation for all. That means all parties will have to compromise and adjust,” said Dahal in an interview to the Post earlier this month.
The hardliners see it differently. “The new constitution should be ‘people’s constitution’, and on the issue of state restructuring we have to follow the report of the state restructuring committee of CA”, the political document of Baidya presented in the CC reads.
A leader said Dahal is ready to create 8-10 federal states in negotiation with NC as long as it addresses issues of oppression and marginalisation, but the Baidya faction has put its foot down on 14 federal states as suggested by the majority report of the state restructuring committee. Left-leaning analyst Shyam Shrestha said Dahal can take any decision inside the party if he wishes.
“Dahal’s position inside the party can be compared to that of Girija Prasad Koirala’s position inside NC. On crucial occasions, he has shown a penchant for risk-taking, so Baidya’s position would not stop Dahal from completing the peace and constitution if he so desires,” said Shrestha.
Maoist politburo member Haribol Gajurel said Dahal is ready to take any risk for the benefit of the nation and the people. “Certainly, there are many challenges inside the party including different dissenting views, but Dahal is ready to take bold decisions that involve significant risk,” said Gajurel.