Brosa Luxemburg

Indeed it was Statist. The reason in my opinion, was because they aligned with the Republicans and used the military. Although this isn't the case for most of the collectives in Spain.

Then let's assay Spain. It faced similar circumstances and remained rather libertarian. You know as well as I that errors by the state caused a lot of the agricultural problems early post-civil war. You had peasant , worker, and soldier uprisings because of the soviets lost their sway.

I'm fine with theory, but when you look at Russia, the soviets didn't possess tantamount power to the state. I think that's a common problem we'll see. The trend of the state and those who are part of it, do not intend to resign their power.

Indeed, it is. Albeit it's not the true rule of the proletariat. It has been shown to be a representative democracy; where leaders decree legislation in the name of the proletariat.

Because it is a form of political power.

Or, a phase a system after the revolution. Then again, that's why I'm not a Marxist.

Spain is a prime example for Communization. It didn't possess the DoTP, it directly took over the means of production, and adapted the mode of production to suit their needs. Some collectives even did away with money all together. I don't believe we need a *phase* system.

I believe in Syndicalism as the instrument to organize the workers, and not for the Unions to own the means of production. So, therefor, I want communization.

I've said before, I have no qualms against a political party. If it proves more useful than 'One Big Union', then we should utilize it. I have a problem if they decide to form a new state.