Jacobinist

Jacobinist
Banned

22nd March 2010
4th October 2010 16:52

More 23 Friends

Recent Visitors

The last 10 visitor(s) to this page were:

This page has had 8,311 visits

Tab Content: Jacobinist's Activity; About Me; Friends

Tab Content: All; Jacobinist; Friends; Photos

Older Activity

No Recent Activity

156

LeftSideDown - 26th March 2010 17:47 View Conversation

I don't really feel as if I'm owning them, they're pretty hard headed but if I was owning them I'd think they'd be changing their minds? Anyway, thanks for the support.
The Red Next Door - 26th March 2010 15:49 View Conversation

hello
Muzk - 25th March 2010 17:00 View Conversation

the stalinist neg-repped you? theyre just pissed that we get more smart anti stalinists than stalinists (assuming there are any smart stalinists out there)
Rusty Shackleford - 25th March 2010 07:35 View Conversation

im drunk right now so my response may not be the greatest. anyways.

with democratic centralism, the workers have their counciles(the soviet as it was known is russian) is pretty much the voting basis for the working class. and since that is central to ML politics, and the council is part of the state, it is a democratic state.

the workers vote on stuff, it is all through th party. anyways yeah. ML is not undemocratic. it is just not like a bourgeois democracy. we can agree that the bourgeois democracy and state are bad. and really. workers voting in their own representative bodies(councils) and then going through a chain to the party leadership through the state does represent workers. there may have been some problems of the past. but claiming that because it was in the 20th century means it is irrelevant is a moot point. anarchism is older than ML, and ML is older than other political movements but it does not mean that they are invalid.
bailey_187 - 24th March 2010 18:40 View Conversation

No. The Moscow trials put Stalin to shame - this i do not dismiss and condemn. The Lysenko affair puts Stalin to shame - this i condemn.

The reality is that you are a rigid anti-stalinist, that dismisses everything Stalin did as "EVIL KAPATALIZT FASCIST".

I dont know where you get of by calling me an "angry teen", your posts, filled with "lulz", constant use of a "K" for capitalist and your stupid "FUCK FBI" picture seems to be very "angry teen"ish.
bailey_187 - 24th March 2010 18:22 View Conversation

You have been unable to prove this in the thread.
bailey_187 - 24th March 2010 14:35 View Conversation

I dont midlesly follow Stalin. I have many criticisms of him. However, i dont accept the distortions, lies and slander
AK - 24th March 2010 09:06 View Conversation

So what's your tendency/ideology?
AK - 24th March 2010 09:05 View Conversation

I used to be a Trotskyist, I still sympathise will them and some of my comrades are Trots (Comrade Lewis, The Ben G). But now I'm a Council Communist (which rejects the idea of a vanguard - presumably because of fear that it might take control of the state) but I also support the idea of a Vanguard Party, seeing it instrumental in building class consciousness and acting as a voice for the socialists to counter Bourgeois propaganda, although it is not necessarily a must if the workers can organise themselves.
AK - 24th March 2010 07:56 View Conversation

Hey thanks for the friend request, comrade.