Barry Lyndon

Even if you disagree, you should really check out the following. It'll increase your knowledge on modern theory if anything and you'll begin to see things through our eyes, and our hopes for escalation in Greece.

Libertarian Communism
Situationism
Post-Left Anarchism
Insurrectionist theory
Revolutionary spontaneity

Anything by Wolfi Landstreicher, Guy Debord, Tiqqun, Monsieur Dupont

I've been cramming in my head a lot of "Infantile" modern theories lately in a way to gain some sort of ideas on how we can turn "push to shove" in our modern context

"But I am also all for Marxists putting aside their sectarian bs and working with anarchists that are politically serious. To be honest, I have more in common with a lot of anarchists then with Stalinists. I think that a fushion of Marxist and anarchist ideas is needed, like you say."

You should read a great book I was recommended and enjoyed its called Nihilist Communism. Check it if you have some spare time.

I have more in common with Marxists(Trots/Left Communists) then most "Anarchists" I've met, our movement is infested with Liberalism in all seriousness its disgusting! There are a few pearls though bcbm on this forum for example holds a lot of my views from what I've seen.

"I don't think Leninism is itself the problem"

I don't like the idea of an outside faction directing a social revolution(I guess im an Infantile eh?) the theory of the vanguard. I think in poorer nations Marxism-Leninism and Maoism are still very relevant.In post-industrial societies like America Leninism is dead its been dead for awhile, the new-left in the 60's/early 70's showed we can gain some ground if we do something new, we have TONS of vanguards of every tendency that argue with each other over the 20th century the Bourgeois are laughing there ass's off in the USA. Us Anarchists have to deal with our own "vanguardists"; the Platformists who seek to confine us to Leftist tradition.

they all have the masculine fetish for Power*

"These people are not Marxists. Their Stalin cultists. Their whole political belief system revolves around defending glorious Stalin at all costs, especially at something called reality."

I don't have much time for any 20th century man-ism, we all don't.
Typically Stalinists are the worst bunch and there parties have meddled in the
organic revolts for far to long(May 68, the KKE on the top of my head)

What I see is once the Stalinists get bored of defending just one leader and accept the genocidal mania of a tyrant they move to another, why we see the insurgence with this Pol Pot bullshit.

I seriously doubt they have EVER read Marx, the masculine fetish for Power. How could you seriously read Marx & Engels and come out of it thinking the dictatorship of the Proletarian is LITERAL.

I was a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist then a Trotskyist until I became disillusioned with Leninism and sided more what what Bakunin had to say about Marxism. Its pulled further then that of course.

I cant wait until Marxism/Social Anarchism(It has somewhat) drops the 20th century and moves forward it will be an exciting day indeed to make the ruling class tremble at the new-new-left, the post-left that has risen from the ashes of failure.

So far I've been called Petty-Bourgeois, a (Closet) Liberal, and even a "Crimethinc'er" its hilarious stuff when Dogmatists try to find ways to attack someone not knowing what exactly they are, especially in my case where I threw out dogmatism, there clutching straws as there party's and ideology collect dust.

Apparently I'm a Liberal now. Anyone who isn't a Marxist is a Liberal or what? Its not very funny.

"He was progressive, but he fucked up organization. i doubt even Angkar knew who the fuck was in Angkar."

Brother No. 1 regarding Pol Pot