ComradeMan

You should really learn how to use the conversation system on RevLeft properly, by the way. LOL. You are talking to yourself.

Yes, you insulted me, because I have the right to agree with Lenin's decision as a Marxist. Calling me a "psychopathic murderer" for that is indeed offensive. You realise many Marxists and Leninists would agree with me on this? So like I said why don't you just go around ranting to everyone? Fool. Does this mean you think whoever supported those who killed entire aristocratic families during the capitalist French Revolution (and they killed FAR FAR MORE than Lenin ever did) are "psychopathic murderers" too?

Whatever.... talk to the hand....!

On Shariati: your groundless claim that he was offended by my supposed "Islamophobia" (a complete lie, philosophical disagreement is not discrimination) is a form of misrepresentation. Before you call me "cowardly" for bring him up (actually I never even mentioned him in the thread, I only advised him to be aware of your misrepresentation, which I believe he has the right to know), consider the fact that you mentioned him first in a baseless way without any real reason or need.

By the way, I don't like flaming, but I always respond in kind after other people flame against me. And you started this whole crap. So either agree not to flame again or the "argument" will inevitably continue.

Advice: why don't you go and rant to all the Leninists that support his decision to execute the Tsarist family and call them "child-killing monsters" as well? Better yet, why not call Lenin himself just that? After all, Leninists only support his decision, but he was the one who actually carried it out! Surely he is a greater "monster" then?

I'm not saying you have to agree with this decision, but seriously, you are over-reacting here and making too much out of this single point. Lenin killed far far less people than the capitalist revolutionaries did during the French Revolution. Why is it that bourgeois historians always seem to demonise Lenin more? Class biases?

Just cool off, man.

You obviously consider that China had a right to invade another people's land because they were "inferior" backward and medieval. That's why.
You are an imperialist.

I'm not racist towards Tibetans in anyway, I only support the overthrow of landlordism in Tibet. How is that racist, seriously? Landlordism was also overthrown in Han China itself with many deaths. As I said before does this imply then that the Maoists-Stalinists were instruments of Western socialist colonisation in China as a whole? Answer that please. Why apply a double standard to Hans and Tibetans?

I don't care what psycho told you, did he also tell you that he stopped me from being banned? Ask Edelweiss, he's the capo around here.

You are really rather repetitively stupid aren't you? Where did I apologise for Tibetan Lamaism for fuck's sakes? Show me... post the thread---- be my guest.

Who gives a fuck about whether Maoists consider me reactionary or not? They probably consider you reactionary because you live in the bourgeois West you buffoon.
If you think parroting what the CWI, the FCUK the ABC or the fucking XYZ is- to be objective then it shows you have no capacity for independent thought.

From a Marxist perspective, supporting Lenin's actions in killing the Tsarist family is not reactionary. Of course many people dispute his decision, that's ok too. But supporting Lenin's actions there doesn't imply supporting infanticide in general. I told you that already. During the capitalist French Revolution, many aristocrats were executed too, does that mean you oppose the French Revolution as well? You don't seem to understand class analysis, and I think that is the central weakness in your political stance.

For your restriction, psycho told me it's due to borderline Zionism, and he is an admin.

Show me how my arguments are invalid (in the thread, not here), rather than just throwing personal insults at me.

Your apologism for Tibetan Lamaism relative to Maoism is indeed reactionary. I'm not asking you to agree with Maoism, just that Maoist Tibet was relatively more progressive than Lamaist Tibet. And you can't even do that. Even many anti-Maoists like the CWI agree with that point. Your just not being objective.

That's right- I think insulting people who condone killing innocent children, as murdering psychopaths is pretty reasonable.
Your many arguments.... LOL!!!!!!!!! Your logically flawed blabbering filled with factual inaccuracies and a lack of any sense of objectivity... don't insult arguments. Like I said before,
you're the first person I have met who is really so stupid they begin to believe their own strawmen.
You also go around insulting people calling them scum and pieces of shit, and then cry like a big dumb baby when you think you've been "insulted"... OMG!!!!!! Were you insulted? Find me someone who cares and I'll tell the same thing I'd say to you....
Fuck off.