Bilan

I have the pamphlet you quote in your sig. Bought it when I was in New York, got a book about the Italian Communist Left as well. Also, why did you remove the good Stephen Fry from your sig? That was perhaps one of my favorite sig quotes.

I don't really care ae just get rid of the T word. Maybe "Workers Party solidarity with PFLP"

For some reason I don't seem able to PM you... but anyway, the problem is with the threads title. So if you changed that that would be enough. Cheers

I didn't find "Bilan: Chapter 26" quite as thrilling. It actually borders on the more psychological aspects - in the sense that flaming has apparently been 'justified'. Justified in the eyes of the beholder, of course, to try and admonish himself from any apparent 'blame' that someone wishes to hand around. Of course I would have thought we were all better than the "he started it!" schoolboy-esque claims which in fact have no basis in reality. Its quite telling that you have got to constantly respond and go on the offence, at the same time feebly trying to "justify" your abusive language.

Aah, the classic comeback for one with little answers.

As far as i'm aware, you were contending that I was a dick, which I don't deny, and now are feebly trying to justify repeated flaming by crying 'troll'. Am I on the money on am I on the money?

Also, the classic schoolboy retort of "thick" "stupid" is duly noted. Heck, at least you're changing it up a bit!

Funny, as i've counted five uses of the word 'fuck' since you started going off on one, at least half a dozen uses of the word 'twat'. I also think its hilarious you keep using the word 'boy' as if you're some sort of haggered sixty-year-old man sitting on an armchair talking about 'the war' or some sort of other event. Its great, because how old are you? Like, twenty three?

Did I ever tell you about the time I was involved in the Red Clydeside strikes, boy?

Oh, cool! As predicted the man who is not bothered comes back with more flames and another rant!

What are you trying to point out, exactly? That i'm a dick? Here's the latest: everybody knows this (see? I can use bold as well!).

It isn't really effective when you try to turn things around. I'm not pretending i'm a dick, but you are trying to use this to excuse your actions. Nae gonnae work, buddy. I look forward to your next eloquent reply, probably with some sort of insult based on the word 'fuck'.

I meant your user title.

But yes, selective memory indeed from yourself. I quote: "royal douche" "hush now" - your usual patronising crap, and of course a provocation. After this altercation you post 'makes sam_b cry' in your user title: again a provocation.

So of course I call out this nonsense like I always do. Let's also stop being selective in your attmepts to play some sort of victim. If you really weren't bothered about this why would you keep responding again and again? If you really weren't bothered why would you resort to flaming? In other words, for someone not bothered, you have a funny way of showing this. When you then can't handle the heat of this flaming, you then say it is 'trolling': kind of like the kid at school that throws insults but when he gets some in return he runs off to the teacher. Probably unwise after calling someone a 'fuckwit', eh?

You can really not be bothered and stop responding, not like thats going to happen.