Jesus Saves Gretzky Scores

For example, both shows make heavy use of irony and sarcasm, irreverently poking fun at just about anything in site. A crucial difference arises, however, whenever the issue of race comes up. For Heidecker and Wareheim, two white men (who both seem to have Scandinavian or Teutonic names, although I am not really all that informed on etymology of surnames) the topic of race, particularly, black people, can only be approached, given the apolitical context, as simply another topic to be handled ironically. Also, consider that irony is a form of distancing and differentiation. Irony in reference to a concept implies disavowal, criticism, and sometimes critique.

Maybe, but I was never much of a Heidecker-Wareheimian. Andre-Buressism sort of began from the same principles, but took it further, to a whole new level. For my part, I believe it's good to appreciate the origins of what we love, but I believe Heidecker-Wareheimianism to be the aesthetic basis for Andre-Buressism, the latter having much deeper political implications, although neither show could really be construed as significantly political.

Thanks for the request, comrade!

Chiquita Banana, Chiquita Banana, Obama!

Shit's hilarious!

Yeah, most people really like Bordiga's writings on the role of the party.

did you ever get my last message? sorry it was so long comrade.