V. interesting - I'm still struggling with the implications tho. For example, what does this mean in terms of the circulation of commodities as C-M-C / M-C-M? Does this imply a problematization of labour theory of value? What does it mean in terms of the relationship between state/class power and profits/surplus value? On the other hand, does it mean that fiat money is a kind of "money-in-drag-as-money" - that it still fundamentally "represents" (or, rather, is subject to the underlying realities of) commodity production, and, in practice, serves as money, while, at the same time, not being the "type of money it claims to be" (ie its relation to prices is not actually quantity based)?
Hey, I know you feel that "imperialist society has already become moneyless in the Marxist meaning of the term 'money'." I know you elaborated on this idea somewhere - could you point me to it? Alternatively, if you feel like it, if you wanted to explain it to me via PM, I'd be interested. I take it it has to do with fiat money / financialization?
Malthusian Leninist? Wait, do you support restricting healthcare and aid to developing countries for the sake of high mortality rates?
I hope you are not serious about Malthusian bullshit. If you understand german, the leftist television station shows great statistics and logic against malthusian arguments of supposed "overpopulation" here
He, you didn't answer my question yet: http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...&postcount=199
25,000 shock workers had a roller coaster ride as the ebb and flow of struggle went on. If some on here have no understanding of that it is because they have had no personal experience. If you get the chance get a copy it has had good peer reviews. it is warts and all, the better for that. We can learn and move on....haha...some of us might!! Zulu
Keep up the good work, Zulu. You are posting great posts (better than many older members').
Marxist-Leninist Drifter
Maoist Revolutionary
To exist is to resist.