Inquisitive Lurker

I have answered your arguments in the most prudent way possible; outright dismissal. This is not meant as an insult, nor a blind ideologue's stance. I see that you generally know what you're talking about, but within that is mixed up some outright wrong statements, and conclusions that contradict what most mainstream physicists have to say on the matter, which you state as accepted fact.
I know not whether you are a contrarian, mistaken, or a quack. What I do know, is that I will not be baited into your ultimatum. IF I respond, it will be on my terms.
Will you send NATO to order me to respond?

No need to be an asshole though, if you have a disagreement fine but try to be comradely about it.

i'm genuinely surprised you're not banned yet.

I'm not replying to you anymore, because you seem to be totally incapable of reading, which must be why you keep saying totally stupid unrelated things...so much for that soaring atheist IQ, huh?

Oh, and no, being an atheist doesn't make you left-wing. Just ask this guy. A bit like supporting imperialism doesn't make you left-wing *cough*

Please don't reply, because you'd be wasting your time. I won't be paying you any attention any more, because an ability to read is a prerequisite for being my conversation partner. You don't quite fit the bill, sorry...

Who decided on the three possible answers? You. Who decided they were all negative? You. Who obviously understands nothing of Jewish theology? Clearly you, too...

Oh, and by the way, this is a site for leftists, to discuss leftist ideas. If you want to discuss theology or whatever, go to a forum dedicated to that purpose. As of yet, you've not really made any posts that show any hints of leftism, and many which have actually belied a pretty reactionary outlook. For this reason, I assume that this isn't the forum for you.

Why does it make any difference to you, exactly?

I'm not going to, actually, because I didn't say they were illogical, I said that they have have significantly reduced their appeal by the use of this particular argument, which is considered rather offensive by many people. I don't know if you know, but it's generally considered offensive to use acts of genocide as an argument to 'prove' some abstract point, as you yourself did in that post. Hence I've intentionally decided to ignore it.