Rafiq

It seems he more points out inconsistencies with some error, but also agrees with Marx, but shows a notable bias to bourgeois ideology but not heavily so. The next chapter on dialectics accurately describes Marx's conceptions. I think it's a read I'll continue with an open eye for items that aren't quite congruous with what Marx and Engels said. There were noticeable distortions in the first chapter. I think I'll write a review when I come back to the forum in a few months or if I ever do because I'm leaving out of necessity

I believe I'm reading a critique of the materialist conception of history but I can't tell

He seems to reduce the change throughout history to be simply that of technology and technique and I'm really sure sure if the author is in agreement or not

Hey, Do you know about M. M. Bober and his book in Karl Marx's interpretation of history?

What're your thoughts on Stirner and egotist anarchism

Ahhhh yeah! The two anti civ users just show me that they don't really know what they're talking about. Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State explained so much of this to me already. The debate is useless and the local egoist primitivist has just shown awful views in this case. Hell, I want to bust in but I haven't the confidence and the reactionary one will just flame me

That describes a lot of anarchists, sadly.

Why are you staying out of the anti civ thread?

What is a philistine?

Should I read Anti Duhring and The Holy Family by Engels