ChrisK

Also I'll be gone for I have to recover from my dad's beatings, so kindly fuck off for now

a bad habbit of mine, typos and editing arent mine thing XD Oh really what subject has changed? let us review your original point which was that the thread had a point 'I didnt see' but 'you did' since you are such brilliant when it comes to actual maoism. But go on show me how I change the subject, for really it'll get us to a solution or actually prove where I have changed the topic. Also, if I recall, the OP's meaning for the thread was this http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...74&postcount=1 Now to recall he basily said 'in defense of maoism' or I'm mistake and this is actually the thread of "Mao Zedong" but in either case the OP asked for things on Maoism and not pesudo-intelligent (there spelt it correctly) But did I say you're an elitist for disagreeing with me? No, I say your an elitist for actually thinking you know of the socio-economic system but provide nothing on the subject.

Oh almost forgot XD You are an elitist for you fail to not only provide acts but glorify yourself as if you know of the time period, or socio-economic system of the nation or the other arguments we leftist go by, and when you are brought up agaisnt corner, or actually go out of your way to mis-read the entire point of the thread and instead create your 'own point' in which it was previously meant to only bring sources aout Mao-Tse Tung and not rant on about he was a 'sucky philosopher' or anything else Rosa can spit out of his mouth and still remain an arse to the max)

(pesudo-intellegent=1/2 intellegence or not intellgent) And since you disagree with dialecital materialism go on, explain how quanative changes to qualitave changes ar wrong or mis-acurate. But here's where you turn into the shit I know you are. Not only have you gone around my questions( like you say we maoists do) but you do not want to debate here where many can see but want me to create a thread just for you and debate on there. But since you didnt tell me 'how' or 'why' he sucked at philosophy you onl prove my past pint. And for 'r-tard' comment, perhaps shouldnt have posted it but it seems your blind. You knw where it shows my age? yeah its right there you arse. But you continue to generalize me (not only which you dont know my critizisms on Mao nor what neo-Maoism is so thank you idiot) Now can you actually prove my pevious points or just keep whining like a child wanting its toy?

And you still go on these pesudo-intellegent statements. And I thought you were the least bit intellegent, then again you were the r-tard who thought Stalin and Hitler were allies. Now if you actually read Mao's theories, or hell even read some of them, you would have know his 'philosophy' basicly extents from Dialectial Materialism/Histroical Materialism and most of his theories advanced the communst(Marxist-Leninist) movement but now we go on "all maoist regimes". oh reallt? how many maoist regimes were there? China was one of them and it was socialist ever since the early 50s and has continued such through out its existence (now its debateable) and tell me how nepal is socialist. If you can't explain these then shut the fuck up and shut your elitist trap. And If you can not go back to you're little Trotskyite world of idealism, mkay?

And you wonder why I neg repped you.

True for Cliffites never change their arguments. Usually stay to their "arguments of state-capitalism" or Maoism in this case.

Glad I could help.

Did you get my e-mail?

Not at all; I've already glanced at it and it looks quite good.