Charles Xavier

What's up GD. Why not make a positive case for Leninist organization rather than simply attacking anarchism? I'd join you if you did that.

Ah.

Me, I am with the HU, but I have affiliations here and there with many ML's in Canada.

If you are trying to see if I'm eligible as a potential CPC member, I've allready been there once, and I'm not going to do it again.

I would recommend CPC-ML to you,though.

Are you?

Lmao... Not to make you look like an even bigger idiot in front of your adoring fans, but if you had not bothered me about being butthurt for getting neg-repped for a snide remark, you could have avoided looking this special kind of stupid in the first place. Since we both know your "disputing an ultra-left tendency" just means slandering political opponents by denouncing random unrelated fictitious stuff as being "ultra-left" somehow. Here are the actual quotes including the response I neg-repped you for:


Quote by Cheung Mo:
44% of the 4% Americans who called Obama "Too Conservative" voted for John McCain. How the fuck does that work? With oodles of crack-cocaine?

Quote by GeorgiDimitrovII:
they could be ultra-leftist morons.
Who want to spill the blood of the working class around them in order to get their perfect Utopian revolution to happen.

http://www.revleft.com/vb/leftist-am...591/index.html


Part of the actual Leninist critique of ultra-leftism, which An Infantile Disorder puts forth, is that the ultra-left is wrong because they refuse to get involved with bourgeois elections and parliamentarism in general. Yet here you are claiming that misinformed voters who voted for McCain instead of Obama were ultra-leftists, or now even more bizarre, that they represent an ultra-left tendency somehow.

I'll put the obvious contradiction here as simple as possible for you:

Lenin: "The ultra-left is wrong by not participating in bourgeois parliamentarism."
You: "Some misinformed voters who did participate in a bourgeois election are morons and by extent must be ultra-leftists."

Are you really unable to see how contradictory, nonsensical and devoid of logic this claim of yours is? If you still can't see why your remark was incredibly stupid, please tell me how Republican voters are ultra-leftists...

Or feel free to continue being a vain and arrogant windbag by trying to characterize the actual points I made as "rambling" and refuting your nonsense as "embarassing myself." Your Freudian self-projection is pretty entertaining and your helpless flailing makes it all the sweeter.

Things might also have changed a bit since 1920 so let me be the first to welcome you to 2008, the year where Canada is still located in North-America.

And it was already painfully obvious that you've never read anything about the subject beyond Lenin's outdated polemic, so stop with the inane bullshitting like "The worst things get, the better things get." being a "tenant" (sic) of ultra-leftism or your initial nonsensical remark about misinformed voters being ultra-leftists.

You also can't have things both ways by on the one hand claiming ultra-leftism isn't a "unified" ideology yet on the other hand still try to slander it by attributing certain fictitious political positions to it.

If you meant that ultra-leftism isn't a monolithic group or movement, that's hardly surprising considering there has never been such a thing as a "unified" ideology. Even a quick glance at Marxism shows it has several different and at times completely opposite currents. That still doesn't mean ultra-leftism is a catch-all phrase for stuff Leninists don't like.

So take your own advice and stop embarrassing yourself by trying to speak with authority about something you know little to nothing about beyond cheap slander. It's pretty laughable and makes me less inclined to take anything you say seriously.

Not everyone is American, in French ultra-gauche or ultra-left refers to left-communism and signifies a particular political current. So can you stop annoying me and reply to your thread instead of this nonsense.

What are you talking about? Do you actually know anything about the ultra-left as a political movement or do you just use the term as a pejorative?