The Idler

I don't agree with the Trotskyite conception of 'no public disagreement'.

Decisions would be voted on, as democratic centralism. But you have to have a chairman, and other positions of the sort.

People would have positions as a paid party member- i.e. that's their job.
Does that count as a privilege? There would be a hierarchy, but these people would be elected, accountable and revocable. It would be run via democratic centralism.

Then that's how our party would be different.

In my opinion, we must build a mass party which is made up of the majority of the proletariat; since the party would be controlled by its members, the proletariat run the organisation

Much like mine then.
I think my views coincide with Luxemburg for DotP, but with lenin on organisation. A rather eclectic view...

You seem like a Marxist, but also have strong anarchist sympathies. What's your view on the DotP?

Are you a libertarian Marxist?
I'm getting mixed signals.

Who I mentioned in the email:http://www.revleft.com/vb/member.php?u=13857
Thank a lot, by the way.